> > From: Ed Finnell [mailto:snip]
> > Why I don't use Google for posting:
> > _http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5751_
> > (http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5751)
> From: "Schwarz, Barry A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It would be nice if the article gave some examples of what they find
> o
I see no merit in attempts to make IBM-MAIN Google-friendly, whatever
exactly that may be. The newsgroup is derivative and should remain so.
Equally, of course, practices that are gratuitously unfriendly to the
newsgroup should be avoided, but I have never observed such a practice.
John Gilm
Subject: Re: Google-friendly Posting
Why I don't use Google for posting:
_http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5751_
(http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5751)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruc
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:09:22 +0200, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In order to have the Google Groups system work, the following guidelines are
>strongly suggested:
>
Most of this netiquette applies to anyone monitoring the list with a news
reader.
That is what I used (Netscape) long be
I overcome that by applying a gmail account which is for subscribing MVS
lists only. It's free so I will not lose anything.
>>
Why I don't use Google for posting:
_http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5751_
(http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5751)
*
In a message dated 7/11/2007 11:10:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why don't I use the IBM-MAIN archives? The "Table of Contents" feature seems
to rely purely on the subject and so works better - but the archives tend to
be slower than Google Groups. Nevertheless
On 7/12/07, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using these guidelines/conventions, Google Groups works much better for
IBM-MAIN - or for any supported list.
Why don't I use the IBM-MAIN archives? The "Table of Contents" feature
seems
to rely purely on the subject and so works better - but
In order to have the Google Groups system work, the following guidelines are
strongly suggested:
1. When starting a new thread, please do *not* "reply" to an existing post
in another thread.
2. When continuing a thread, please *do* "reply" to an existing post,
normally the most - probably ex
8 matches
Mail list logo
