Re: IBM and Texas Outsourcing troubles part two

2010-09-13 Thread Howard Brazee
On 10 Sep 2010 14:03:27 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote: >The question should be: >"How can we deliver our product/service most effectively?". > >Unfortunately, the question asked is: >"What can we out-source, this year?" Those are subsets of "How can we show on our resume how we dr

Re: IBM and Texas – Outsourcing troubles part two

2010-09-10 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Funny how companies still figure on IBM to have all the answers when all they >need to do is look internally. >I've seen this more times than I can count. Ditto. I've lost my job twice due to outsourcing, and I'm pretty good at what I do. Unfortunately, that makes you high-priced. And, out-sourc

Re: Fwd: IBM and Texas – Outsourcing troubles part two

2010-09-10 Thread Larry Macioce
The problem IMHO is new management and accountants The new management has cut their teeth on the server world for example we had a deputy cio hire in, we were talking about the mainframe one day and I explained to him how we ran cics(explained it) a db, batch, users(developing cobol), etc and he

Re: IBM and Texas – Outsourcing troubles part two

2010-09-10 Thread Guy Gardoit
reover, > Texas claims, IBM is only working on the transformation of five of the > remaining 22 agencies, and that these five are “only partial” > transformations. > > > http://www.theoutsourceblog.com/2010/08/ibm-and-texas-outsourcing-troubles-part-two/ > > ---

Fwd: IBM and Texas – Outsourcing troubles part two

2010-09-03 Thread Anton Britz
transformation of five of the remaining 22 agencies, and that these five are “only partial” transformations. http://www.theoutsourceblog.com/2010/08/ibm-and-texas-outsourcing-troubles-part-two/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff