Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:48:51 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
Mark, thanks for the explanation. However, I find it strange that
almost
all of the jobs I have
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 07:07:50 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
OK, the IEF032I (no IEF374I messages in the JES log) messages have no TCB
or SRB so I guess that this is a red herring. That goes to show how close we
look at our SYSOUTs...lol.
Thanks,
Jon
Well, that would mean z/OS
Ok, my last response that I posted mere seconds before walking out the door
last night might have been less than helpful.
Those changes were for the version of the IEFACTRT exit that prints the
following:
- --TIMINGS (MINS.)--
The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts.
It is always helpful when describing a problem to be as specific as
possible.
By does not provide do you mean that the fields are 0?
Do you mean that the address is 0? (This would be expected for job
termination
entries to IEFACTRT, but not for
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts.
It is always helpful when describing a problem to be as specific as possible.
By does not provide do you mean that the fields are 0?
Do you mean that the address is 0? (This would
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:31:07 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
It's not in MLPA and I looked back through several years of listings and it
doesn't seem to have worked for quite a while. I guess no one is looking at
those fields...
Jon et. al.,
I looked when I upgraded to z/OS
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:31:07 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
It's not in MLPA and I looked back through several years
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: 04 January 2011 14:49
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
Mark, thanks for the explanation. However, I find it strange that almost
all of the jobs I have looked at in our archives have no TCB
No, we don't use Ops/MVS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Beesley, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
You're not running Ops/MVS 11.8 are you
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:48:51 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
Mark, thanks for the explanation. However, I find it strange that almost
all of the jobs I have looked at in our archives have no TCB or SRB time. I
can't believe that all of them are that short running, but who knows?
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:33:38 +0200, #1490;#1491;#1497; amp;#1489;#1503;
#1488;#1489;#1497; gad...@malam.com wrote:
Hi,
We are testing z/OS 1.11.
We use the supplied sample for IEFACTRT provided in SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEEACTRT).
The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts.
All other values
Thanks,
I saw that, but it doesn't say anything about CPU time.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Roger Lowe
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 4:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
Thanks,
I saw that, but it doesn't say anything about CPU time.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Roger Lowe
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 4:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re
Subject:Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
And it doesn't
: Monday, January 03, 2011 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
Check to see if you have the module in MLPA (IEALPAxx). I know we do.
Regards,
John K
Our module is in LPA.
Gadi
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Veilleux, Jon L [veilleu...@aetna.com]
Sent: 03 January 2011 17:31
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11
It's not in MLPA
Here is a Superc listing of the changes I made for z/OS 1.11.
Good Luck!
I - L R01,PARMSPTALOAD STEP TCB CPU TIME
ADDR RPL=3 00368 00368
D - L R01,PARMSTPCLOAD STEP TCB CPU TIME
ADDR
I -
Hi,
We are testing z/OS 1.11.
We use the supplied sample for IEFACTRT provided in SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEEACTRT).
The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts.
All other values seem to be OK.
Has anyone seen the problem?
Is there a fix?
Thanks
Gadi
לשימת
18 matches
Mail list logo