Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-05 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Of Mark Zelden Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:48:51 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote: Mark, thanks for the explanation. However, I find it strange that almost all of the jobs I have

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 07:07:50 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote: OK, the IEF032I (no IEF374I messages in the JES log) messages have no TCB or SRB so I guess that this is a red herring. That goes to show how close we look at our SYSOUTs...lol. Thanks, Jon Well, that would mean z/OS

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Neal Eckhardt
Ok, my last response that I posted mere seconds before walking out the door last night might have been less than helpful. Those changes were for the version of the IEFACTRT exit that prints the following: - --TIMINGS (MINS.)--

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Peter Relson
The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts. It is always helpful when describing a problem to be as specific as possible. By does not provide do you mean that the fields are 0? Do you mean that the address is 0? (This would be expected for job termination entries to IEFACTRT, but not for

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread גדי בן אבי
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts. It is always helpful when describing a problem to be as specific as possible. By does not provide do you mean that the fields are 0? Do you mean that the address is 0? (This would

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:31:07 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote: It's not in MLPA and I looked back through several years of listings and it doesn't seem to have worked for quite a while. I guess no one is looking at those fields... Jon et. al., I looked when I upgraded to z/OS

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:36 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:31:07 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote: It's not in MLPA and I looked back through several years

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Beesley, Paul
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L Sent: 04 January 2011 14:49 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 Mark, thanks for the explanation. However, I find it strange that almost all of the jobs I have looked at in our archives have no TCB

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
No, we don't use Ops/MVS. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Beesley, Paul Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 You're not running Ops/MVS 11.8 are you

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-04 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:48:51 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote: Mark, thanks for the explanation. However, I find it strange that almost all of the jobs I have looked at in our archives have no TCB or SRB time. I can't believe that all of them are that short running, but who knows?

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread Roger Lowe
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:33:38 +0200, #1490;#1491;#1497; amp;#1489;#1503; #1488;#1489;#1497; gad...@malam.com wrote: Hi, We are testing z/OS 1.11. We use the supplied sample for IEFACTRT provided in SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEEACTRT). The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts. All other values

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread גדי בן אבי
Thanks, I saw that, but it doesn't say anything about CPU time. Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Lowe Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 4:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 Thanks, I saw that, but it doesn't say anything about CPU time. Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Lowe Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 4:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread John P Kalinich
Subject:Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 And it doesn't

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
: Monday, January 03, 2011 10:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 Check to see if you have the module in MLPA (IEALPAxx). I know we do. Regards, John K

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread גדי בן אבי
Our module is in LPA. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L [veilleu...@aetna.com] Sent: 03 January 2011 17:31 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11 It's not in MLPA

Re: IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-03 Thread Neal Eckhardt
Here is a Superc listing of the changes I made for z/OS 1.11. Good Luck! I - L R01,PARMSPTALOAD STEP TCB CPU TIME ADDR RPL=3 00368 00368 D - L R01,PARMSTPCLOAD STEP TCB CPU TIME ADDR I -

IEFACTRT problem - z/OS 1.11

2011-01-02 Thread גדי בן אבי
Hi, We are testing z/OS 1.11. We use the supplied sample for IEFACTRT provided in SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEEACTRT). The exit does not provide CPU (TCB and SRB) counts. All other values seem to be OK. Has anyone seen the problem? Is there a fix? Thanks Gadi לשימת