Re: Inaccurate CPU% reported by RMF and TMON

2008-01-10 Thread Jason To
Hi Walter, You are right, our capture ratio went down to 60% at the time of the problem. Thanks for pointing this to me. Regards, Jason. Quoting Walter Medenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sounds like uncaptured cpu and therefore is not an error with RMF and TMON. Uncaptured cpu is cpu that has

Re: Inaccurate CPU% reported by RMF and TMON

2008-01-08 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason To) writes: > We have encountered some weird problem last week and discovered that > the total MVS CPU busy percentage reported by both RMF and TMON were > inaccu

Re: Inaccurate CPU% reported by RMF and TMON

2008-01-08 Thread Van Dalsen, Herbie
Behalf Of Walter Medenbach Sent: 08 Januarie 2008 05:36 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Inaccurate CPU% reported by RMF and TMON Sounds like uncaptured cpu and therefore is not an error with RMF and TMON. Uncaptured cpu is cpu that has not been associated with a particular address space. Your

Re: Inaccurate CPU% reported by RMF and TMON

2008-01-07 Thread Walter Medenbach
Sounds like uncaptured cpu and therefore is not an error with RMF and TMON. Uncaptured cpu is cpu that has not been associated with a particular address space. Your capture ratio appears low. Find out when the problem started and whether it occurs 24x7. Look for such things as SLIP traps or high p

Inaccurate CPU% reported by RMF and TMON

2008-01-07 Thread Jason To
We have encountered some weird problem last week and discovered that the total MVS CPU busy percentage reported by both RMF and TMON were inaccurate. RMF and TMON reported MVS CPU percentage does not match with the total CPU% usage by the jobs running in the system at least in one LPAR, the