Radoslaw has made the essential point. Times like
hh.mm.60
are rejected as syntactically illicit by time-vetting routines,
conversion routines, and the like. Glonass, RS's example, did hang
for just this reason. There is a strong consensus among the members
of the several international committ
W dniu 2012-03-13 22:28, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:12:07 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
The sequence
2012 June 30, 23h 59m 59s
2012 June 30, 23h 59m 60s
2012 July 1, 0h 0m 0s
will certain
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:12:07 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>The sequence
>
> 2012 June 30, 23h 59m 59s
> 2012 June 30, 23h 59m 60s
> 2012 July 1, 0h 0m 0s
>
>will certainly appear in the transmitted sequence, but
Paul,
The sequence
2012 June 30, 23h 59m 59s
2012 June 30, 23h 59m 60s
2012 July 1, 0h 0m 0s
will certainly appear in the transmitted sequence, but its middling
term was chosen to call attention to itself
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:45:35 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>At 14:41 -0500 on 03/13/2012, John Gilmore wrote about Leap seconds
>and the Server Timer Protocol:
>
>>This is the title of a new this month IBM Techdocs White Paper,
>>WP101091, by Gregory Hutchison,
At 14:41 -0500 on 03/13/2012, John Gilmore wrote about Leap seconds
and the Server Timer Protocol:
This is the title of a new this month IBM Techdocs White Paper,
WP101091, by Gregory Hutchison, a PDF of which can be downloaded from
the IBM Techdocs website.
What is the URL of the site
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:41:32 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>Be aware that the next leap-second insertion will be at 11:59:59 UTF
>on 30 June 2012.
>
UTF? I don't know the TLA. But I'd say UTC 23:59:59.999..., perhaps
a second later than yours.
And I know we disagree on this, but, from:
http
Quite right! It is WP102091. I am suitably repentent.
--jg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The correct# is WP102081
George Kozakos
z/OS Software Service, Level 2 Supervisor
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
It's actually WP102081. WP101091 talks about TS7770.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 14:42
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Leap seconds and the Server Timer Protocol
This is the title of a new this month IBM Techdocs White Paper,
WP101091, by Gregory Hutchison, a PDF of which can be downloaded from
the IBM Techdocs website.
Some of you may well find his discussion of the distinction between
the insertion (or, in principle, removal) of a leap second
1) by stee
11 matches
Mail list logo
