Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-05 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 8/5/2010 at 02:37 PM, Clark Morris wrote: > As someone whose mainframe training in the 1960's was OJT on DOS and a > combination of OJT, some employer sponsored IBM courses and SHARE > attendance in the late 1970s an 1980s, I question the need for > operating specific college training. Gi

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-05 Thread Clark Morris
On 3 Aug 2010 11:04:09 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >"The company commands 85 percent of the mainframe market and can't afford >to abandon a technology that despite its age, still underpins some 10,000 >mainframes that are used by 4,000 to 5,000 customers around the globe." > >and

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-05 Thread Clark Morris
> Date: 08/03/2010 09:31 AM > > >

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread zMan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: > We should be working to help our management realize just what that "horse > hockey" really means. NOTHING!!! > But they're so cute, on their little skates, with their four legs going in all directions...

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
but how many people who read the article know what odiferous horse hockey it is? - We should be working to help our management realize just what th

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
- out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get ahold of *that much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC YARDS of the stuff in the mixer, if it really really was completely packed .. I used the stuf

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
Steve Comstock wrote: Alan Schenck wrote: If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara? Duh! I don't know any of those names. Sorry, but the allusion is just lost, and I suspect I'm not

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Bonno, Tuco
iginal Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Wednesday, 04 August, 2010 01:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe Youtube of Cement truck turning into confetti. http://www.youtube.c

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread John H Kington
[ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bonno, Tuco [t...@cio.sc.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 1:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe I'm still trying to figure out, what was the myth they were trying to expose? I've watched the show a

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Bonno, Tuco
cussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Wednesday, 04 August, 2010 01:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe Youtube of Cement truck turning into confetti. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxm_qpKh7Jw On Wed,

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Mark Pace
gt; > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:17 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe > > > > out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get > > ahold of *that much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC Y

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Kirk Talman
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 08/03/2010 10:45:09 AM: > From: John P Kalinich > > I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. > > "Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a > 3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decad

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bonno, Tuco > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:17 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe > > out of curiosity

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Ron Hawkins
You have to stay in more, and watch TV. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of > Steve Comstock > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:14 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] More FUD on

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Howard Brazee
On 3 Aug 2010 22:16:33 -0700, timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) wrote: >Yet that's exactly what's NOT happening (or at least not happening fast >enough) in the rest of computing -- and that's a big problem for individual >businesses and for the planet. Remember those old movies which ta

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Bonno, Tuco
out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get ahold of *that much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC YARDS of the stuff in the mixer, if it really really was completely packed .. I used the stuff on occasion in viet-nam, and believe me, you don't need 8 cubic yards of that s

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
TV show called mythbusters. Great program! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe Alan Schenck

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Alan Schenck wrote: If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara? Duh! I don't know any of those names. Sorry, but the allusion is just lost, and I suspect I'm not the only one. -- Kind r

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Mark Pace
One of the larger explosions on Myth Busters was a cement truck. It was completely packed with C4. When it went off, the cement truck disappeared. On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Steve Comstock wrote: > Alan Schenck wrote: > >> Dude. One word cement truck. >> >> > Clueless. > > -- > > Ki

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Alan Schenck wrote: Dude. One word cement truck. Clueless. -- Kind regards, -Steve Comstock The Trainer's Friend, Inc. 303-393-8716 http://www.trainersfriend.com * To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment! + Training your people is an excellent investment

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Alan Schenck
Dude. One word cement truck. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-ma

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Schenck > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:03 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe > > If this myth n

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Alan Schenck
If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
There's a lot of sloppy reporting in the world. But it still amazes me that so many people would get things so wrong when it comes to the number of machines and what it signifies. If the world of computing were actually materially advancing, we would fully expect the number of machines to collapse

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Mark Pace
I see the same thing here in Tallahassee. In the early 80's every State agency, the school board, the county government, and multiple banks all had mainframes and staff. That was probably 15-20 mainframes. Now there are about 5 left in the State. The school board, county government and banks ha

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Eric Bielefeld
I think my experience in Milwaukee bears out the quoted text below. When I first started as a systems programmer, there were approximately 30 to 40 mainframe shops. We had a group that met quarterly until about 1991, and we'd often get at least 30 shops represented. Now, to my best estimate

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
- better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) /s/ tuco bonno; Graduate, College of Conflict Management; University of SouthEast Asia; "I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! "

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
"The company commands 85 percent of the mainframe market and can't afford to abandon a technology that despite its age, still underpins some 10,000 mainframes that are used by 4,000 to 5,000 customers around the gl

Re: [**SPAM**] Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread J. D. Cassidy
Serious topic yaw here. Koyma was / is more "famous".. => better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) => => /s/ tuco bonno; => Graduate, College of Conflict Management; => University of SouthEast Asia; => "I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! " => => =>

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Bonno, Tuco
better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) /s/ tuco bonno; Graduate, College of Conflict Management; University of SouthEast Asia; "I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! " >Too much trouble.. send him and the other mouse-twitching folks to >

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
"The company commands 85 percent of the mainframe market and can't afford to abandon a technology that despite its age, still underpins some 10,000 mainframes that are used by 4,000 to 5,000 customers around the globe." and "The number of mainframes today has dropped to about 10,000, from 30,00

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread J. D. Cassidy
Too much trouble.. send him and the other mouse-twitching folks to Kolyma. => - => =>>I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the =>> article. =>> =>>"Some companies still employ an older mainframe

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
- I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. "Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a 3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decades-old Disk Operating

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
-- I guess if we did it consistently and often enough we might get a reporter or two to check their facts but as they are probably not Mainframe savvy (or even tech savvy) I doubt it would get anywhere. Perhaps if we targeted the editor

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
Yeah, so, do we have a responsiblity to point up the error of such careless reporting? Is it in our (mainframer's) best interest to send emails decrying the sloppy reporting? Do we let the myth continue? --

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Howard Brazee
On 3 Aug 2010 09:10:45 -0700, ken.porow...@cit.com (Ken Porowski) wrote: >I guess if we did it consistently and often enough we might get a >reporter or two to check their facts but as they are probably not >Mainframe savvy (or even tech savvy) I doubt it would get anywhere. >Perhaps if we targete

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Ken Porowski
I guess if we did it consistently and often enough we might get a reporter or two to check their facts but as they are probably not Mainframe savvy (or even tech savvy) I doubt it would get anywhere. Perhaps if we targeted the editor of the publication pointing out the shoddy reporting of their sta

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Steve Comstock
3/2010 09:31 AM Subject: More FUD on the demise o

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread John P Kalinich
03/2010 09:31 AM Subject: More FUD on the demise of the

More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Ken Porowski
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2010/tc2010082_274669. htm -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the arc