Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Fagen
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:10:52 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ATX is displayed when CHTRKID in the CSCB (see macro IEECHAIN) contains: CHATXID EQU X'05' - ATX ADDRESS SPACE IDENTIFIER It does indeed mean APPC Transaction job. (Not sure where this attached designation came

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-08 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward E. Jaffe Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Need help with msg IEE114I snip (E)JES will show the ATX on the Activity display. If you

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Hello Ed, it's been a long time since talking to the guys at Phoenix. In any event, I tried the SRESET and YALL command, and there is no Display ATXs === YES on the Entry Panel or Primary Selection Criteria window. Maybe it's due to our version (V2R5M0).

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
It turns out that the users/programmers have this desktop product that uses some variation of FTP. It has the ability to spawn an ATX address space. These are not APPC address spaces. Looks like an expansion of the ATX attribute may be needed.

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Chris Mason
/programmers and the mainframe was IP. Chris Mason - Original Message - From: Richard Tsujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, 08 March, 2006 3:44 PM Subject: Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved It turns out that the users

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
There is no entry for the product in the APPCTP data set. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
We discovered something interesting. We did an FTP operation using our terminal emulator product (PASSPORT) instead of the PC-based FTP product, and we can see an address space of type ATX started. We stopped the test and then brought down APPC. We repeated the FTP test and it worked, which

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-08 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Richard Tsujimoto wrote: Hello Ed, it's been a long time since talking to the guys at Phoenix. In any event, I tried the SRESET and YALL command, and there is no Display ATXs === YES on the Entry Panel or Primary Selection Criteria window. Maybe it's due to our version (V2R5M0). Rick,

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-08 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
McKown, John wrote: (E)JES will show the ATX on the Activity display. If you can't see it, try issuing the SRESET and YALL commands. Does (E)JES have an ALL YALL command as well as the YALL command? Southerners want to know this sorta stuff! GRIN. No. But, we're fixing to add one

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Richard Tsujimoto wrote: It turns out that the users/programmers have this desktop product that uses some variation of FTP. It has the ability to spawn an ATX address space. These are not APPC address spaces. Looks like an expansion of the ATX attribute may be needed. What release of

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Thanks Ed, I'll follow-up on this. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Ed, you embarrass me grin, we're clinging onto OS/390 2.6 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Chris Mason
- Original Message - From: Richard Tsujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, 08 March, 2006 6:02 PM Subject: Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved We discovered something interesting. We did an FTP operation using our

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:26:38 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What release of the operating system are you running??? OMVS used to use APPC/MVS for its forked procedures. There was no need to expand the meaning of ATX for those address spaces. They were indeed APPC transactions,

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I - solved

2006-03-08 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
The use of netstat was not for checking any APPC connection. It was done to see if an IP connection was present, which it was. Sorry for any confusion I might have caused. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing a list of jobs and STCs. Those that are jobs have J next to them, and STCs have S next to them. We have one that has an A next to it. According to Messages and Codes, A stands for ATX. I can't find out what ATX stands

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
attached transaction programs (ATX) created by the START or MOUNT command We have 1 A task as well, ftpd1. It looks like it is a spawned UNIX task. Rex When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing a list of jobs and STCs. Those that are jobs have J next to them,

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 3/7/2006 11:39:55 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Messages and Codes, A stands for ATX. I can't find out what ATX stands for. Any mount messages pending? If the command is one of the following, some combination of the fourth, fifth, and

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Alan C. Field
These are probably APPC Transactions. When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing a list of jobs and STCs. Those that are jobs have J next to them, and STCs have S next to them. We have one that has an A next to it. According to Messages and Codes, A

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Attached transaction programs. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread J R
APPC Transaction? From: Richard Tsujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Need help with msg IEE114I Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:09:30 -0500 When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:09:30 -0500, Richard Tsujimoto wrote: When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing a list of jobs and STCs. Those that are jobs have J next to them, and STCs have S next to them. We have one that has an A next to it. According to Messages and

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Instead of multiple replies, I combined them below (irrespective of poster): It looks like it is a spawned UNIX task. We're not running/using OMVS, so I don't think this is the case. Any mount messages pending? Nope. These are probably APPC Transactions. That may be a possiblity, but when I

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Can you tell us what the task name is that is listed as A? Subject: Re: Need help with msg IEE114I Instead of multiple replies, I combined them below (irrespective of poster): It looks like it is a spawned UNIX task. We're not running/using OMVS, so I don't think this is the case. Any mount

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Bruce Black
We're not running/using OMVS, so I don't think this is the case. but when I did a netstat command, it showed an IP connection with a Windows server, so I don't think APPC is it. For quite a number of years now, TCP/IP uses OMVS sockets, so you are using OMVS if you use TCP. That IP

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Alan C. Field
: Need help with msg IEE114I Instead of multiple replies, I combined them below (irrespective of poster): It looks like it is a spawned UNIX task. We're not running/using OMVS, so I don't think this is the case. Any mount messages pending? Nope. These are probably APPC Transactions. That may

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
For quite a number of years now, TCP/IP uses OMVS sockets, so you are using OMVS if you use TCP. That IP session may explain the ATX You're right about TCP/IP and OMVS. But, I was referring to user applications running in OMVS proper. I suspect your right about IP and ATX as well, but I

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Can you tell us what the task name is that is listed as A? It's a locally name application, e.g. COMETS -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Have you got APPC and ASCH started tasks, possibly ASCHINIT tasks? Yes, but the APPCTP content has only one *job* in it and it isn't the one I'm looking for. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Peggy Andrews
Do you use a monitor product? For instance, we use Mainview and if I look at an overview of what is running, there is a T field for Address Space Type and the HELP for that field indicates that it is showing values for: BAT - Batch STC - Started task TSO - TSO ASC - ASCH (APPC) Address Space User

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Richard Tsujimoto wrote: For quite a number of years now, TCP/IP uses OMVS sockets, so you are using OMVS if you use TCP. That IP session may explain the ATX You're right about TCP/IP and OMVS. But, I was referring to user applications running in OMVS proper. I suspect your right