Hello Paolo,
thank you very much for the hint.
Excuse me when i keep quiet a long time.
After changing the Parm it works fine.
Best regards
Paolo Pirillo
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:17:02 +0200, Paolo Cacciari
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
The problem is that no UID ist passed!
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/31/2006
at 02:38 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Insulting! Obnoxious!
A few pointers, rather than holier than thou could be a good thing.
I have provided pointers, and even sample code[1]. If I haven't
provided them to *you* lately, that's because of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/29/2006
at 12:08 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since I noticed
ITYM perceived, inaccurately.
malice and badgering
PKB.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/29/2006
at 11:45 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It just seems that some people can't take a hint,
PKB.
Schmeul,
I see that not only can't you read, you can't copy text accurately
either.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/28/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Even IBM calls it USS.
Sigh! Humor is such a subtle thing. Maybe I was too subtle for you.
Even IBM calls the user id UID. RS was being a hypocrite. Worse,
because IBM was using UID as an abbreviation for
R.S. wrote:
Since I noticed that vast majority (or even all) of Shmuel's mails
contains only no, you're wrong or USS is not unix I stopped
responding him. I put his e-mail in kill-file, so his mails are
filtered. That's good: no more badgering. I don't loose anything
valuable, cause usually
but we would not do people's work for them; this explains his you are wrong
statements where you expect detailed information on what the error or
misunderstanding is. While his approach may seem
unreasonable, cold, and hurtful,
Insulting! Obnoxious!
A few pointers, rather than holier than
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using USS when you don't
mean USS?
Give it a rest!
Even IBM calls it USS.
The weight of the world must not be on your shoulders if you have nothing to
worry about besides a silly anacronym.
Ted,
Calm down, it is not
Calm down, it is not worth to worry about.
Actually, I was calm!
It just seems that some people can't take a hint,
so I raised the tone of my response.
Schmeul, nobody wants to hear it!
BTW, I'm taking the kill file route, too.
So, respond if you like, I won't see it!
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/27/2006
at 02:06 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
*Note: don't use UID when talking about user. UID usually means User
ID, part of OMVS segment. This is confusing.
How ironic. Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using
USS when you don't mean USS?
Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using USS when you don't
mean USS?
Give it a rest!
Even IBM calls it USS.
The weight of the world must not be on your shoulders if you have nothing to
worry about besides a silly anacronym.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
Hello to all,
I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me.
I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6).
It works fine, but when the command is to be executed I receive
IOACMD:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me.
I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6).
It works fine, but when the command is to be executed I receive
IOACMD:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me.
I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6).
It works fine, but when the command is to be
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me.
I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6).
It works fine, but when the
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No Problem:
STC05980 0090 ICH408I JOB(OSASF ) STEP(OSASF ) IOA.CONNECT.FILE
CL(FACILITY) 544
544 0090INSUFFICIENT
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No Problem:
STC05980 0090 ICH408I JOB(OSASF ) STEP(OSASF ) IOA.CONNECT.FILE
CL(FACILITY) 544
544
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:49:37 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No Problem:
STC05980 0090 ICH408I
18 matches
Mail list logo