Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-09-07 Thread Paolo Pirillo
Hello Paolo, thank you very much for the hint. Excuse me when i keep quiet a long time. After changing the Parm it works fine. Best regards Paolo Pirillo On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:17:02 +0200, Paolo Cacciari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: The problem is that no UID ist passed!

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-31 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/31/2006 at 02:38 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Insulting! Obnoxious! A few pointers, rather than holier than thou could be a good thing. I have provided pointers, and even sample code[1]. If I haven't provided them to *you* lately, that's because of

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-30 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/29/2006 at 12:08 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Since I noticed ITYM perceived, inaccurately. malice and badgering PKB. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-30 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/29/2006 at 11:45 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It just seems that some people can't take a hint, PKB. Schmeul, I see that not only can't you read, you can't copy text accurately either. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-30 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/28/2006 at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Even IBM calls it USS. Sigh! Humor is such a subtle thing. Maybe I was too subtle for you. Even IBM calls the user id UID. RS was being a hypocrite. Worse, because IBM was using UID as an abbreviation for

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-30 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
R.S. wrote: Since I noticed that vast majority (or even all) of Shmuel's mails contains only no, you're wrong or USS is not unix I stopped responding him. I put his e-mail in kill-file, so his mails are filtered. That's good: no more badgering. I don't loose anything valuable, cause usually

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-30 Thread Ted MacNEIL
but we would not do people's work for them; this explains his you are wrong statements where you expect detailed information on what the error or misunderstanding is. While his approach may seem unreasonable, cold, and hurtful, Insulting! Obnoxious! A few pointers, rather than holier than

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-29 Thread R.S.
Ted MacNEIL wrote: Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using USS when you don't mean USS? Give it a rest! Even IBM calls it USS. The weight of the world must not be on your shoulders if you have nothing to worry about besides a silly anacronym. Ted, Calm down, it is not

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Calm down, it is not worth to worry about. Actually, I was calm! It just seems that some people can't take a hint, so I raised the tone of my response. Schmeul, nobody wants to hear it! BTW, I'm taking the kill file route, too. So, respond if you like, I won't see it! When in doubt. PANIC!!

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-28 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/27/2006 at 02:06 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: *Note: don't use UID when talking about user. UID usually means User ID, part of OMVS segment. This is confusing. How ironic. Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using USS when you don't mean USS?

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-28 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using USS when you don't mean USS? Give it a rest! Even IBM calls it USS. The weight of the world must not be on your shoulders if you have nothing to worry about besides a silly anacronym. When in doubt. PANIC!!

OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread Paolo Pirillo
Hello to all, I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me. I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6). It works fine, but when the command is to be executed I receive IOACMD:

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread R.S.
Paolo Pirillo wrote: Hello to all, I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me. I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6). It works fine, but when the command is to be executed I receive IOACMD:

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread Paolo Pirillo
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: Hello to all, I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me. I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6). It works fine, but when the command is to be

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread R.S.
Paolo Pirillo wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: Hello to all, I have a interesting problem and I hope that someone of you can help me. I try to use the EXEC IOACMD from me TSO Command Shell (ISPF 6). It works fine, but when the

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread Paolo Pirillo
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No Problem: STC05980 0090 ICH408I JOB(OSASF ) STEP(OSASF ) IOA.CONNECT.FILE CL(FACILITY) 544 544 0090INSUFFICIENT

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread R.S.
Paolo Pirillo wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No Problem: STC05980 0090 ICH408I JOB(OSASF ) STEP(OSASF ) IOA.CONNECT.FILE CL(FACILITY) 544 544

Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-27 Thread Paolo Pirillo
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:49:37 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paolo Pirillo wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No Problem: STC05980 0090 ICH408I