Re: Problem with RMM and VRSes

2005-11-09 Thread Mike Wood
Staffan, That VRS chain should do what you describe. The results do not depend on whether you have specified VRSEL(NEW/OLD) in parmlib. The types of location do not have a bearing on this. What is important are the data sets and how VRSEL might be processing them. You should see this in the

Re: Problem with RMM and VRSes

2005-11-05 Thread Michael W. Moss
H, There could be many potential situations to explain this, but two that spring readily to mind are documented in the DFSMSrmm manuals, as per: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2R320/6.3? SHELF=DGT2BK31DT=20031211125737 If you use the parmlib member EDGRMMxx

Problem with RMM and VRSes

2005-11-04 Thread Staffan Tylen
Existing VRS chain: ADDVRS DSN('ABC.DEF.**.GV¬¬') CYCLES LOCATION(DR2H) STORENUMBER(1) WHILECATALOG NEXTVRS(DR8H) ADDVRS NAME(DR8H) NEXTVRS(VLT1) LOCATION(DR8H) STORENUMBER(1) ADDVRS NAME(VLT1) LOCATION(VLT1) STORENUMBER(9) Using this schema we expect to see ABC.DEF.XYZ(0) in DR2H,