Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-21 Thread Tim Hare
As the OP on this topic, the explanation helps me understand the rationale for it even if my personal preference is for a new FMID for a new release. I'd be interested to know if new releases are planned to be delivered as maintenance for the foreseeable future (if this can be disclosed)? What

Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-21 Thread Russell Witt
Hare Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E As the OP on this topic, the explanation helps me understand the rationale for it even if my personal preference is for a new FMID for a new release. I'd be interested to know if new

Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-20 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2006 at 07:54 PM, Russell Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The reason for the same FMID's is because while we are changing the release number; it can be done with a simple maintenance upgrade. For example, going from R5.2 to R11.0 or even to R11.5 does NOT require a

Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-19 Thread Tim Hare
This is just a historical question for those of you who may be informed more than I: Does anyone know why CA does not use new FMIDs when they have a new release of CA-1? The FMID seems to stay the same whether you're using CA-1 release 5.2, 11.0, or 11.5 ; I'm just curious if anyone knows

Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-19 Thread Schwarz, Barry A
- From: Tim Hare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E This is just a historical question for those of you who may be informed more than I: Does anyone know why CA does not use new FMIDs when they have

Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-19 Thread Russell Witt
@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E The practice started with R11 and has been carried forward to R11.5. R5.1 and R5.2 had different FMIDs. It has caused me no end of problems at some customer sites. But then 99%+ of their PTFs are coded ++APAR so they appear to be missing some very

Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-19 Thread Len Rugen
Dare I ask what was really gained in calling it R11.0 R11.5 vs just different gen levels? It's not written anywhere, but I'd say most think if the FMID is the same, it's the same release. Was the R11 just a marketing mandate? It seems to be a common issue in a lot of CA products. But then

Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E

2006-09-19 Thread Russell Witt
: Re: Question re: CA-1 and SMP/E Dare I ask what was really gained in calling it R11.0 R11.5 vs just different gen levels? It's not written anywhere, but I'd say most think if the FMID is the same, it's the same release. Was the R11 just a marketing mandate? It seems to be a common issue