And I note in this list perceptible enthusiasm for ShopZ, which I think
embraces RECEIVE ORDER, but little enthusiasm for RECEIVE FROMNETWORK.
I probably would have stated it the other way around: ShopzSeries
embraces RECEIVE FROMNETWORK. RECEIVE ORDER and ShopzSeries don't
really have much
Gil,
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use of RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it was first introduced, we
expected to eventually see customer requests, but I've not seen any such
requests.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ralph_Robison
Gil,
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use
of RECEIVE FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it
was first introduced, we expected to eventually see customer
requests,
In a recent note, Ralph_Robison said:
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:28:16 -0600
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use of RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it was first introduced, we
expected to eventually see customer requests, but I've not seen
From Ralph Robison:
snip
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use of RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it was first introduced, we
expected to eventually see customer requests, but I've not seen any such
requests.
/snip
It would be goodness to be able to do
Business Services
Ralph_Robison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/07/2007 07:28 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SMP/E packaging for RECEIVE ORDER?
Gil,
Just
While the SMP/E RM describes GIMZIP, the utility used to
package for RECEIVE FROMNETWORK, I find no similar assistance
for packaging for RECEIVE ORDER. Have I simply overlooked it,
or has IBM made a business decision not to support ISVs in
supplying that format?
The format of the downloadable
Setting Reply-to: -- I'll summarize and attribute replies, if any.
In a recent note, Kurt Quackenbush said:
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:08:03 -0500
The format of the downloadable files is the same for RECEIVE FROMNET and
RECEIVE ORDER. That is, both expect to handle GIMZIP format
Survey question: What do you do?
1. Download directly to z/OS
a. FTP (what client?) Only APARs in very critical situations.
b. Other (specify)
2. Download to desktop, and then to z/OS: NO
a. FTP
b. Samba
c. IND$FILE
d. NFS
e. Other (specify)
3. RECEIVE FROMNETWORK - Yes
We would be interested in any of our current vendors providing a similar
service to RECEIVE ORDER. Currently we pull maintenance from IBM on an
almost nightly basis and would love to have the same capability with our
other vendors.
(Just cos we receive it doesn't mean it needs to be applied !)
It
Survey question: What do you do?
1. Download directly to z/OS
a. FTP (what client?) - z/OS FTP for lots and lots of stuff
b. Other (specify)
2. Download to desktop, and then to z/OS: yes but only when there is no
choice - some vendors force you to download via HTTPS or HTTP and don't
Survey question: What do you do?
1. Download directly to z/OS
a. FTP (what client?)
b. Other (specify)
a) - almost always (z/OS FTP).
2. Download to desktop, and then to z/OS:
a. FTP
b. Samba
c. IND$FILE
d. NFS
e. Other (specify)
a) - only when 1 a) not
On Mar 7, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
-SNIP---
It would be goodness to be able to do this, but, our experiences with
vendor SMP/E expertise leads me to believe that most vendors would be
hard pressed to get it right. Perhaps the larger
13 matches
Mail list logo
