On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:46:08 -0500, Mark A. Brooks mabr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, the manual process to resolve the change pending condition for a
duplexed structure is cumbersome.
Note that you can quickly identify the structures that must be rebuilt
in order to complete the activation of
Mark,
Thanks for all the info. We will have 1.12 installed next week I will give all
this
a try.
Casey
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
From the z/OS V1.12 preview announcment at
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/8/897/ENUS210-008/ENUS210-008.PDF
In z/OS V1.12 a new DISPLAY XCF,REALLOCATE,TEST option is planned to
simulate the reallocation process and provide information about changes the
REALLOCATE command would attempt to
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:39:23 -0500, Casey Rhodes wrote:
...
Today we activated a new CFRM policy that caused some of our duplexed
structures to go pending. The only way I could find to resolve this is the
reallocate.
I know maybe I am being picky but dont really like to do the reallocate and
A structure remains change pending until it is allocated under the new
CFRM policy. In the case of a duplexed structure, both instances of the
structure need to be allocated under the new policy.
So if your structure is currently duplexed, you need to stop the duplexing
rebuild (keeping either
Mark,
Am i being picky here in being concerned with the overhead of going thru
hundreds of structures just to clear these pendings for a handful. Having to
take the structures out of duplexing and doing the rebuilds and then going
back into duplexing seems quite cumbersome.
I would assume
We are new in the CF structure duplexing world and want to know if there is
another way to clear a pending on A duplexed structure.
Today we activated a new CFRM policy that caused some of our duplexed
structures to go pending. The only way I could find to resolve this is the
reallocate.
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
