-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS - Delete
ISPF 3.4 (nor IEFBR14) won't work for an SMS controlled data set.
I could be wrong, but I
Sigh! Unfortunately, I have for 15 months.
Down-sized twice in three years!
Now, perhaps is the time to get some gas? You can't possibly have been going
downhill this long.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
We are z/OS V1R9. I am not sure how this happen, but I have an
un-cataloged dataset on an SMS managed volume. It won't let me delete
this dataset because it is un-cataloged (it wont let me do anything with
it since it is uncatalogued). Is there an easy way to delete this
dataset. I tried using
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Mark Steely wrote:
We are z/OS V1R9. I am not sure how this happen, but I have an
un-cataloged dataset on an SMS managed volume. It won't let me delete
this dataset because it is un-cataloged (it wont let me do anything with
it since it is uncatalogued). Is there an easy
We are z/OS V1R9. I am not sure how this happen, but I have an un-cataloged
dataset on an SMS managed volume. It won't let me delete this dataset because
it is un-cataloged (it wont let me do anything with it since it is
uncatalogued). Is there an easy way to delete this dataset. I tried using
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:16:11 -0500, Mark Steely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are z/OS V1R9. I am not sure how this happen, but I have an
un-cataloged dataset on an SMS managed volume. It won't let me delete
this dataset because it is un-cataloged (it wont let me do anything with
it since it is
@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SMS - Delete
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Mark Steely wrote:
We are z/OS V1R9. I am not sure how this happen, but I have an
un-cataloged dataset on an SMS managed volume. It won't let me delete
this dataset because it is un-cataloged (it wont let me do anything with
it since
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:41:49 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are z/OS V1R9. I am not sure how this happen, but I have an
un-cataloged dataset on an SMS managed volume. It won't let me delete this
dataset because it is un-cataloged (it wont let me do anything with it since
it is
.
Thanks for everyone help.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 1:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS - Delete
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:41:49 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED
ISPF 3.4 (nor IEFBR14) won't work for an SMS controlled data set.
I could be wrong, but I thought I did that a few years ago with SMS managed
files.
Oh well, wrong again.
(And, I'm sure I'll hear about it)
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
ISPF 3.4 (nor IEFBR14) won't work for an SMS controlled data set.
I could be wrong, but I thought I did that a few years ago with SMS managed
files.
Never with uncataloged, SMS-managed files.
Oh well, wrong again.
(And, I'm sure I'll hear about it)
This
Suppose there was a way to delete posts with wrong/bad information from the
archives. Then, only correct/good information would remain --
increasing its value for research purposes.
Is this possible?
I doubt it.
But, I know I have been wrong.
I have two people on this list who point it out on
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
ISPF 3.4 (nor IEFBR14) won't work for an SMS controlled data set.
I could be wrong, but I thought I did that a few years ago with SMS
managed files.
Never with uncataloged, SMS-managed files.
Oh well, wrong again.
(And, I'm sure I'll hear
Sounds like it would be a cross between a listserv and a wiki. You
might be onto something with that.
Mark Hammond
-Original Message-
This gives me a idea...
One of the problems with the IBM-MAIN archives is the relative abundance
of flat-out wrong information and bad advice.
In a message dated 8/29/2008 2:48:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds like a FAQ to me.
Sounds like an unfunded mandate to me? Isn't part of list experience
learning when and who is usually correct? I guess I could see a challenge
mechanism
down the road,
In a message dated 8/29/2008 2:26:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose there was a way to delete posts with wrong/bad information from
the archives. Then, only correct/good information would remain --
increasing its value for research purposes.
Is this
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:25:54 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This gives me a idea...
One of the problems with the IBM-MAIN archives is the relative abundance
of flat-out wrong information
Yep.
and bad advice.
Subjective.
Sometimes posts with
wrong/bad information outnumber
One of the problems with the IBM-MAIN archives is the relative abundance
of flat-out wrong information and bad advice. Sometimes posts with
wrong/bad information outnumber those with correct/good information. A
person researching a topic must carefully read all posts to ensure only
correct
IMHO, I also find it useful to look at the entire thread. So some of the
solutions aren't and some of them are not a fit for the OP. Those can be
helpful too. While I like the idea of vetting the posts, who will take on such
a large task? And who would be able to be correct on everything?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
[...]
Suppose there was a way to delete posts with wrong/bad information from
the archives. Then, only correct/good information would remain --
increasing its value for research purposes.
Is this possible?
Yes, it is possible. I am not sure what
20 matches
Mail list logo
