Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

In <0818533857960322.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu>, on 03/09/2012 at 08:32 AM, Paul Gilmartin said: >How would that affect the syntax or semantics of the DD PATH= >parameter? A leading // would not be equivalent to a leading /. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:33:11 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >>Better: tilde substitution in the PATH. Where I work, user homes >>are not in /u. And some people mount HOME via NFS from a system >>with YA naming standard. > >Is there an outstanding requirement to support UNC in z/OS Unix?

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

In <7326129770207562.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu>, on 03/08/2012 at 12:15 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: >Better: tilde substitution in the PATH. Where I work, user homes >are not in /u. And some people mount HOME via NFS from a system >with YA naming standard. Is there an outstanding re

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

In <8073223666064012.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu>, on 03/08/2012 at 09:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin said: >All DCB subparameters, or only some? Only some, but the most common. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

In , on 03/08/2012 at 12:01 PM, Scott Ford said: >You saying the working directory on Z/os unix is different than >the homes? I believe that he is saying that the working directopry on z/OS Unix need not be the same as the user's home directory, just as the TSO PROFILE PREFIX need not be the

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

In <5b3c73e7-6309-4438-b9ac-9e002f989...@yahoo.com>, on 03/07/2012 at 05:30 PM, Scott Ford said: >There is a limitation on parms of 100 bytes if memory serves me. The PARM keyword parameter of EXEC has a limit of 100; the PATH keyword parameter of DD does not. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) M

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Ford >> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:02 AM >> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >> Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one >> pa

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:29:38 -0600, McKown, John wrote: >> -Original Message- >> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Ford >> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:02 AM >> >> You saying the working directory on Z/os unix is different >> than the homes? >> I really, really hope tha

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Ford > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:02 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one > parameter field &g

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

e Company of > TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > > > >> -----Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc >> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:11 AM

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:11 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one > parameter field > > On 8 March 2012 10:46

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

l Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 9:47 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On 8 March 2012 10:46, Edward Jaffe wrote: > On 3/8/2012 7:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> >> o Pathnames must be absolute (start with "/") > > > This is an inconvenience I wish could be rectified. No leading slash should > default to one's home directory. When, and on which system, would this be

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

Duh! The whole point of home directories. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On 3/8/2012 7:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: o Pathnames must be absolute (start with "/") This is an inconvenience I wish could be rectified. No leading slash should default to one's home directory. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:02:47 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: > >2) many historical keyword subparameters, e.g., those of the DCB= >keyword parameter, have been half promoted: they continue to be usable >as subparameters, but they may now also be coded as parameters > All DCB subparameters, or only some?

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 06:48:52 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >PATH is not only under-specified in the JCL reference, it is also >over-specified. > >- Is case-sensitive. Thus, /u/joe and /u/JOE and /u/Joe define three >different files. > >Is not an aspect of the PATH= parameter, it is an aspect of the H

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

r continuing DD statement with only one parameter field On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:04:40 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >Well, who's counting indeed, but my JCL reference says > >The pathname: ... >- Has a length of 1 through 255 characters. ... > I stand corrected; I misread earlier in t

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

This thread has very largely straightened itself out. For the record, i.e., for the sake of anyone who reads through it in the archives: 1) parameters and subparameters are of two sorts, positional and keyword 2) many historical keyword subparameters, e.g., those of the DCB= keyword parameter, h

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

All good points. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field On Wed

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:04:40 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >Well, who's counting indeed, but my JCL reference says > >The pathname: ... >- Has a length of 1 through 255 characters. ... > I stand corrected; I misread earlier in the same section: Each directory or filename: Is preceded by a sl

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf > Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 5:58 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

ashes. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 5:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field On Wed, 7 Mar 2012

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 18:54:47 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote: >On 7 March 2012 18:27, Charles Mills wrote: >> Many long threads here on that one ... >> >> What's worse, "parm" means two different things. >> >> There is a limit of 100 characters on the operand of PARM=. >> >> But I was referring to "param

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

That works. In fact you can also do a partial substitution using a variable. Lloyd - Original Message From: "Hardee, Chuck" To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Wed, March 7, 2012 3:16:05 PM Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field I don&#x

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On 7 March 2012 18:27, Charles Mills wrote: > Many long threads here on that one ... > > What's worse, "parm" means two different things. > > There is a limit of 100 characters on the operand of PARM=. > > But I was referring to "parameters" in the more general sense of, as the > manual says, "The

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Ford Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 2:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field There is a limitat

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

2012 1:40 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field > > JCL Reference is your friend: > > //S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='THIS IS A LONG PARAMETER WITHIN APOST > // ROPHES, CONTINUED IN CO

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

ma.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field JCL Reference is your friend: //S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='THIS IS A LONG PARAMETER WITHIN APOST // ROPHE

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

JCL Reference is your friend: //S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='THIS IS A LONG PARAMETER WITHIN APOST // ROPHES, CONTINUED IN COLUMN 16 OF THE NEXT RECORD' Example 4 shows continuation of a parameter field when a parameter is enclosed in apostrophes. The parameter field is continued

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

Ha! //MYDDNAME DD PATHDISP=, // PATH='long/path/name' works. Kinda silly, but it works. The SET symbol is not a bad idea also as there actually is a fair amount of commonality among the three paths, so I could "factor out" that common part into one SET symbol. Thanks, Charles -Origina

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 2:09 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@ba

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

On 3/7/2012 2:11 PM, Charles Mills wrote: I've got several DD statements in a proc that have only a single parameter, PATH='long/path/name' Because the path is long the statement will not fit on a single card image (but the PATH parameter by itself will). So I coded //MYDDNAME DD // PATH='lon

Re: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

9 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field I've got several DD statements in a proc that have only a single parameter, PATH='long/path/name' Because the path is long the statement will not fit on a single card image (but th

Tips for continuing DD statement with only one parameter field

I've got several DD statements in a proc that have only a single parameter, PATH='long/path/name' Because the path is long the statement will not fit on a single card image (but the PATH parameter by itself will). So I coded //MYDDNAME DD // PATH='long/path/name' No good. It turns out the JCL