Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source

2007-07-25 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz) performs excellent COBOL syntax validation on your PC. http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/devzseries/ You can see some recorded

Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source

2007-07-25 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message- From: Timothy Sipples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz) performs excellent COBOL syntax validation

Tools for Validating COBOL Source

2007-07-24 Thread Lizette Koehler
I have posted this on the COBOL.LANG newsgroup, but thought I would as here as well. I ran into a problem where a programmer stated that the PERFORM THRU EXIT was not functioning for one of many. I felt it was a missing IF END-IF combo. Other than doing an exclude all and the manually paring up

Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source

2007-07-24 Thread Nagesh
Hi Lizette, I haven't tried thisbut, it might do the trick. Open the COBOL source in edit mode and type HI on the command line and hit Enter. You will see the below. Select 5 for COBOL and select option 3 for Coloring. File Languages Colors Help

Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source

2007-07-24 Thread Neil Duffee
On 24 Jul 2007 at 05:05, concerning Tools for Validating COBOL Source, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to IBM-Main: [snip] a programmer stated that the PERFORM THRU EXIT was not functioning [snip] I felt it was a missing IF END-IF combo. [snip] So, does anyone know of a tool

Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source

2007-07-24 Thread Timothy Sipples
The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz) performs excellent COBOL syntax validation on your PC. http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/devzseries/ You can see some recorded demonstrations which include syntax checking here: