Re: Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?

2008-11-06 Thread Knutson, Sam
Hi, For the archives we have now also converted two Sysplex to use MSGBASED processing for CFRM without incident. We just did this on our production Sysplex this morning. D XCF,STR . EVENT MANAGEMENT: MESSAGE-BASED MANAGER SYSTEM NAME: DSYS In IBM tests using MSGBASED instead of

Re: Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?

2008-07-11 Thread Doug Henry
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:30:52 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am almost ready to issue SETXCF START,MSGBASED and do this in our test Sysplex (2 LPARs). Before we jump in I wanted to know who else has tried this and have you seen any reduction in I/O to the couple data sets? Any

Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?

2008-07-08 Thread Knutson, Sam
Hi, I had followed a number of APARs including OA24563. We are now at a point where we are considering exploiting MSGBASED processing for CFRM. I am almost ready to issue SETXCF START,MSGBASED and do this in our test Sysplex (2 LPARs). Before we jump in I wanted to know who else has tried

Re: Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM?

2008-07-08 Thread Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
and the issues it took to get there. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 SYSN 12:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Using SETXCF START,MSGBASED exploit MSGBASED processing for CFRM