Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-22 Thread Galambos, Robert
As a important note. While we are talking about data from going to one country to another for processing/storing etc. One also needs to remember when the data is used develop/test/qa 'outside' the original jurisdiction, data masking consideration is even more important. According to some

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-22 Thread Howard Brazee
On 21 Jun 2009 15:05:18 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote: Maybe not yet, but there is a bill in front of Federal parliament that, if passed, won't even require a warrant to get the information to CSIS). We'll be as safe and secure and free the other states that have state control

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-22 Thread Bob Woodside
On Monday 22 June 2009, Howard Brazee wrote: On 21 Jun 2009 15:05:18 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote: Maybe not yet, but there is a bill in front of Federal parliament that, if passed, won't even require a warrant to get the information to CSIS). We'll be as safe and secure

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-21 Thread Ted MacNEIL
One example was Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Ontario, who in a cost-savings measures, decided to take advantage of GoogleApps. This caused a strike by academic professionals when they realized their emails, documents, etc. would be entirely open to Homeland Security. (AFAIK, CSIS is not so

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-17 Thread Howard Brazee
On 16 Jun 2009 18:41:32 -0700, rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) wrote: There's a very fine line between security and paranoia; when do we decide that it's been crossed? The enemy's definition is when we do what they want. (bin Laden had a hope that we would attack Saudi Arabia, but was

Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-16 Thread Clark Morris
On 16 Jun 2009 12:48:37 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM Software Secure Support

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-16 Thread Ted MacNEIL
As a US citizen living in Canada, I would strongly urge Canadian companies not doing business in the US to also not keep any personal data on US computers because of Patriot Act implications. Even if they're doing business in the US, I would strongly recommend keeping Canadian data in Canada.

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-16 Thread Clark Morris
On 16 Jun 2009 16:31:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: As a US citizen living in Canada, I would strongly urge Canadian companies not doing business in the US to also not keep any personal data on US computers because of Patriot Act implications. Even if they're doing business in

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-16 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip - Go to bottom Clark Morris wrote: On 16 Jun 2009 16:31:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: As a US citizen living in Canada, I would strongly urge Canadian companies not

Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens

2009-06-16 Thread John Baxter
-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Where should processing be done was Re: IBM Software Secure Support via USA Citizens snip - Go to bottom