Show original | Report this message | Find
messages by this author
Folks,
I would like to remind everyone that there is a another mailing
list
(actually, a Yahoo Group) out there called IBM-Main-OT. That's "OT" for
"Off-Topic". So, instead of engaging in off-topic d
In <250107.47615...@web161408.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 02/27/2011
at 11:29 PM, Ed Gould said:
>I do not know how often you visit the yahoo site for the group.
This is not a group; it is a mailing list.
Messages from this group are gated to a news group called
bit.listserv.ibm-m
The Listserv discussion list IBM-MAIN has nothing to do with
yahoo.com. Someone else setup a yahoo group called IBM-MAIN-OT.
I have no privileges to change anything about that group.
According to yahoo, someone needs to contact:
ibm-main-ot-ow...@yahoogroups.com
and have them alter the settings
All:
I do not know how often you visit the yahoo site for the group.
But apparantly YAHOO in their infininte wisdom has made the default to enable
"chat" as part of YAHOO's group facility.
That means that people of lets say less than diserable character hang around
and
try an
ld go to places like Google, Yahoo!, or Six Apar with some mainframes i
>in a trailer already running a hundred-or-so virtual Linux instances, for
>a week or three. I'd let the company build their software on those Linux
>images and test it out.
>
>If they want to test for lon
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20060316&mode=classic
Jon
IBM already has search technology which it uses internally - you never see a
hit from an IBM
machine other than the Almaden spider. It's a very polite little IBM bot - it
even obeys
robots.txt:
In a message dated 5/4/2006 11:12:52 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm. I get page not found on that
>>
Hmmm, hmmm, hmmm.
If you are reading this document, then your website has likely been
touched by our web crawler. We have included some information belo
Phil Payne wrote:
IBM already has search technology which it uses internally - you never see a
hit from an IBM
machine other than the Almaden spider. It's a very polite little IBM bot - it
even obeys
robots.txt:
66.147.154.3 - - [03/Apr/2006:01:39:13 +0100] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 1911
ris Mason
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Thursday, 04 May, 2006 5:10 PM
Subject: IBM and Google / Six Apart / Yahoo / whomever
> IBM already has search technology which it uses internally - you
Linux images running
one per Intel chip.
I'd love to see it fly, but I'm not hopeful.
Tony H.
Tim Hare wrote:
> If I were IBM, I would gather some of the smart Z/VM/Linux
> folk, and I would go to places like Google, Yahoo!, or Six
> Apar with some mainframes in a trailer
IBM already has search technology which it uses internally - you never see a
hit from an IBM
machine other than the Almaden spider. It's a very polite little IBM bot - it
even obeys
robots.txt:
66.147.154.3 - - [03/Apr/2006:01:39:13 +0100] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200
1911 "-"
"http://www.al
lt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
05/04/2006 10:18 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: IBM and Google / Six Apart / Yahoo / whomever
Tim,
That is a brilliant idea! Google running on a mainframe would
m/products/SIM/simplist.htm
From: Tim Hare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If I were IBM, I would gather some of the smart Z/VM/Linux folk, and I
would go to places like Google, Yahoo!, or Six Apar with some mainframes
in a trailer already running a hundred-or-so virtual Linux instances, for
a week or three
Maybe this belongs on the Linux-390 list - but since the thread started
here, let's continue it here.
If I were IBM, I would gather some of the smart Z/VM/Linux folk, and I
would go to places like Google, Yahoo!, or Six Apar with some mainframes
in a trailer already running a hundred-
14 matches
Mail list logo
