My zfs file systems are *not* SMS managed and I have no issues.
snip
Lucymarie Ruth
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged filesystems. Not good for those
folks who
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: zFS (was Re: good, bad, or ugly?)
snip
When formatting a new zFS, it's a two step process
: 16. marraskuuta 2007 1:48
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ZFS: good, bad, or ugly?
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged
Hal Merritt wrote:
Why should we convert? Why shouldn't we convert?
HFS is stabilized. All new enhancements appear in zFS only. It runs a
7734 of a lot faster too!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:08 PM
Subject: ZFS: good, bad, or ugly?
What's the groups' feel for ZFS?
Why should we convert? Why shouldn't we convert?
Any gotcha's?
z/os.e 1.7.
Thanks!!
The very
I still waiting to hear/experience a positive thing about zFS files...
I find the coding of the options confusing and VERY error prone.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
What's the groups' feel for ZFS?
Why should we convert? Why shouldn't we convert?
Any gotcha's?
z/os.e 1.7.
Thanks!!
The very best of the season to you, yours, and theirs.
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
intended
: ZFS: good, bad, or ugly?
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged filesystems. Not good for those
folks who like to clone their filesystems
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged filesystems. Not good for those
folks who like to clone their filesystems just like any other
Huh?
My root filesystem is a zFS and it is *not* SMS managed.
Brian
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:48:08 -0700, Lucymarie Ruth wrote:
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
10 matches
Mail list logo
