Hi Itschak,
In respect of your Linkage Edit issue:
Situation two, that in error:
Output from compiler is in an object library. SYSLIB is the same. A SYSLIN
INCLUDE OBJ(MYPGM)' loads the object code, but all the Cobol2 modules
needed to be linked together with the object code couldn't be found
Hello everybody:
We want to export a test catalog to our disaster site and we want use the
FTP because we don't share unit tapes between us.
We've tried to use the export function and then send by ftp (in binary) to the
same dataset in the disaster site (with the same DCB), but the import
On 9/25/08, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must
they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation?
The answer is YES; I've never understood why.
-
Because the CICS programs are loaded by the CICS loader and not by
Kurt Eastwood wrote:
We are running z/OS 1.8 and SMS is active.
It's not enough. The question was Are temporary datasets managed by
SMS? If not then you need some disks mounted as STORAGE.
If SMS does manage temporary datasets, then it is not required, but
still allowed.
--
Radoslaw
I have an LE-compliant program that consists of a mixture of Assembler and C
routines. I have said goodbye to ESTAE embraced the LE equivalents
CEEHDLR, CEE3SRP and the like.
My abend-handling routines work OK, but I cannot seem to get control after
an Operator cancel.
This is a standard
John McKown wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:12:14 +0200, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And when reading about the marriage of the operating system to the z
hardware, I wondered if this was somehow different from the Mac. Anyone
know if/how it is?
It is similar. Apple will only
Psystar is the current Mac clone vendor. Apple wants them dead.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:39 AM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember Mac clones. Hardware manufactured by some Taiwan company with
(legal) MacOS. It was approx. 14 years ago, possibly before MacOSX premiere,
surely on
Mike Baldwin wrote:
Three years later, I guess this (discontinue software distribution on tape)
is still in the planning stage.
A customer of ours just ordered their IBM z/OS maintenance...on 3490 tapes.
They've kept some C22's.
Did you try to *convince them* to use Internet delivery or CD/DVD?
Hi,
following our disaster recovery planning, we've tried to execute a planned
hyperswap but we've found that gdps shows that some concurrent copy is
active so the dasd switch must be stopped.
Previously, we've executed the cmd F ANTAS000,LISTSESS ALL and we've not
found any CC active.
I doubt that, as the two run on the same machine (same defaults) and with
same parameters passed to the binder.farther more, the second case scanned
syslib, but referenced only the second library and ignored the first one.
To be more specific, here is the onle who worked for me:
//syslin dd
Because the CICS programs are loaded by the CICS loader and not by normal z/OS
program loading mechanisms.
I thought IBM was going to change that 20 years ago to make CICS easier to
maintain.
At least that's what a CICS SYSProg told me back then.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Hi Itschak
Looking at the two examples below. Should the SYSIN in the second one be
SYSLIN, or is there another definition somewhere else. SYSLIN being the main
input with SYSIN usually being a concatenation via // DD DDNAME=SYSIN
//syslin dd disp=shr,dsn=syslin from prev. step
//syslib dd
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Other systems that most people consider mainframes (and that you can buy)
include:
Worldwide market:
Unisys ClearPath MCP systems (formerly Burroughs)
Unisys ClearPath OS 2200 systems (formerly UNIVAC/Remington/Sperry)
Mostly domestic Japanese market:
Fujitsu MSP systems
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system
linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation?
The answer is YES; I've never understood why.
The CICS Loader Domain,
Could you supply the JCL you use to do the EXPORT or the DFDSS with the
messages?
I usually code a BLKSIZE=32760 on my DFDSS dumps of datasets for FTP
transmissions. DFDSS does not require it, but for FTP transmissions it
helps.
Lizette
Hello everybody:
We want to export a test
Denis O'Sullivan wrote:
I have an LE-compliant program that consists of a mixture of Assembler and C
routines. I have said goodbye to ESTAE embraced the LE equivalents
CEEHDLR, CEE3SRP and the like.
My abend-handling routines work OK, but I cannot seem to get control after
an Operator cancel.
Yes, It is SYSLIN.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Terry Sambrooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Itschak
Looking at the two examples below. Should the SYSIN in the second one be
SYSLIN, or is there another definition somewhere else. SYSLIN being the
main
input with SYSIN usually being a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2008
at 11:31 AM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's not enough. The question was Are temporary datasets managed by
SMS? If not then you need some disks mounted as STORAGE.
Nonsense; PUBLIC is good enough for temporary data sets. He needs STORAGE
for new
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:37:56 -0500, Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all, I tried searching the archives for VOLID starting with ##,
and volume id ##, but didn't get any hits. We have from time to time had
cataloged datasets that have the volid as ## Where the ## are really
##'s
Previously, we've executed the cmd F ANTAS000,LISTSESS ALL and we've not
found any CC active. We've obtained dumps to analyze this scenario but
we'd
like to know if anyone knows another way to review if any CC really it
exists.
Christian,
try to use FCQUERY command, and take a look to this
Such a change will perhaps never happen. CICS support storage protection for
RENT programs since a long time before z/OS does this for NON APF programs.
There are more nice features provided by CICS with some help from z/OS
Roland
Because the CICS programs are loaded by the CICS loader and
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:54:59 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you supply the JCL you use to do the EXPORT or the DFDSS with the
messages?
I usually code a BLKSIZE=32760 on my DFDSS dumps of datasets for FTP
transmissions. DFDSS does not require it, but for FTP transmissions
Hi R.S.,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:22:00 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They've kept some C22's.
Did you try to *convince them* to use Internet delivery or CD/DVD?
Although I would use Internet myself, it's not my role there and I would not
want to usurp yours as the DVD evangelist ;-)
Could you supply the JCL you use to do the EXPORT or the DFDSS with the
messages?
Dump (with BLKSIZE=32760):
//BACKUP EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=5M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DASD DD UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR,VOL=SER=SIS808
//OUT DD
i think that the reason the loadlibs need to be in DFHRPL even if in
linklist is because CICS does its own type of load of the modules from
DFHRPL, not a MVS load which would come out of steplib/linklist.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I think you're going to have problems trying to FTP a RECFM=U dataset. I
think you need to either write it out as RECFM=FB, or use a utility like TSO
XMIT to turn it into a dataset that is easily FTP'd.
David Logan
Manager of Product Development, Pitney Bowes Business Insight
http://centrus.com
That VATLST00 you listed looks suspiciously like the one you get from IBM
with a driver system when you first installed MVS/OS/390/z/OS. I am willing to
bet that it was never customized after that initial install.
Jeff
Hello,
I would like to pass a situation by everyone to get their opinon
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:02:30 -0400, Barkow, Eileen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i think that the reason the loadlibs need to be in DFHRPL even if in
linklist is because CICS does its own type of load of the modules from
DFHRPL, not a MVS load which would come out of steplib/linklist.
CICS now uses
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:06:27 -0600, David Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're going to have problems trying to FTP a RECFM=U dataset. I
think you need to either write it out as RECFM=FB, or use a utility like TSO
XMIT to turn it into a dataset that is easily FTP'd.
David Logan
Manager
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:03:39 +0300, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Any idea why Situation two doesn't work? As I said, it looks like a binder
parameter that controls that, but I can't find which one.
Please post the complete JCL for your situation 2. If a PROC is used, post
the proc and the JCL that
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:50:10 -0500, John McKown wrote:
If you are going z/OS to z/OS, you should be able to:
bin
stru r
quote site pri=? sec=? cylinders
put dfdss.file
Note that you don't need to specify the LRECL, BLKSIZE, and RECFM in this
case because the z/OS ftp client sends that
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:50:10 -0500, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are going z/OS to z/OS, you should be able to:
bin
stru r
quote site pri=? sec=? cylinders
put dfdss.file
For z/OS to z/OS I always use:
mode b
ebcdic (or type e if you prefer)
put file.name
Mark
--
Mark
I use MODE C and TYPE E.
Compression allegedly reduces network bytes by a -lot-. 60% if you can
believe the messages. YMMV
Note: AFAIK, a FTP like this with any Windows server in the path is
likely to have issues. Reason is that Windows often insists on
translation even when directed not to.
Hi Mike,
FDR uses volsers beginning with '' as placeholder volsers until that
piece of a multi-volume dataset has been restored. For VSAM, the 5th
character is 'V' and the 6th character is the type (Vn). Datasets other
than VSAM will have a numeric value as the 5th 6th characters
quote
I have heard people who consider their AS/400 machines
to be mainframes. [Or whatever it is that the AS/400
morphed into.]
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
/quote
Definitely the folks who lurk/sell on e-bay consider AS400s mainframes.
:-)
Rex
I think recfm u should work, you might try this.
//STEP05 EXEC PGM=FTP,REGION=2048K,
// PARM='SYS093.UMB.COM (EXIT TRACE '
//NETRCDD DUMMY
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
This could be happening because ANYDD is a new DD statement which
should follow the SYSLIB DD statements if there is a SYSLIB DD statement
present in the link-edit procedure being invoked. Specifying
MSGLEVEL=(1,1) on the JOB card should make that clear,
Bill
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:08:03 +0300,
I can't supply JCL for situation two, as this is dynamicly invoked by SCLM.
I plan to changed the IOTYPE from S to A and specify the object library as
the input, including member name. I read the DFSMS Program management manual
and have some ideas to check next week...
Itschak
On Thu, Sep 25,
Claudio Marcio wrote:
Hi,
This is my dataset
Data Set Name . . . . : BRASIL.ZOS.CONTEST.JCL
General Data Current Allocation
Management class . . : USRMGMT Allocated tracks . : 2
Storage class . . . : USRBASE Allocated extents . : 1
Volume serial . .
I am looking for the best way to handle digital certificates and TN3270
emulation. I am in the process of implementing SSL on Telnet. I have
generated a certauth and a certsign certificate through acf2. Both of these
certificates were imported onto a workstation and are functioning as they
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:28:27 -0500, Big Iron wrote:
This could be happening because ANYDD is a new DD statement which
should follow the SYSLIB DD statements if there is a SYSLIB DD statement
present in the link-edit procedure being invoked. Specifying
MSGLEVEL=(1,1) on the JOB card should make
I do this all the time. Before we had PPRC between our primary and DR site I
used to send not only adrdssu dataset dumps of catalog export files but entire
disk dumps back and forth between the two; nowadays I use it for releasing
software distributions from my systems development/test LPAR.
Steve Comstock wrote:
[Whoops! fixed a typo in the oget command below. sorry.]
OK. So your home is root. Not a good idea, but I'm finding
it to be pretty common.
Knowing that, then here's the series of commands I recommend
you issue, starting at ISPF 6:
== oput
John, you've got right!!
I can't be able to restore the dump with DFDSS (alias error), but I've got it
with the import. Now we have the test user catalog in the disaster side.
Thanks' a lot
Jorge
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
Patrick,
I'm having a hard time making any sense out of your question. Tasks can
certainly WAIT, but I've never heard of an SRB WAIT. What do you mean by that?
Do you mean when a task has scheduled an SRB and is WAITing for an SRB to POST
it?
Perhaps you can elaborate.
Tom Harper
IMS
Have you closely compared the SYSPRINT output
to check if the processing options differ in any way?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:34:16 +0300
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linkage editor different ways to bind
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
I can't supply JCL for situation two, as this is
I think the OP is saying that self signed certificates have been
generated. Each workstation should need the Certificate Authority
(CA) cert chain of the Tn3270 cert. The way to avoid this is to use a
cert that is signed by a common authority.
Some TN3270 clients and some windows
Yes. The main difference is that SCLM uses binder INCLUDE command, while the
batch program is using the object code as main input.
Itschak
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:58 PM, J R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you closely compared the SYSPRINT output
to check if the processing options differ in
Hi Tom,
I'm sorry, yes my below is poorly worded.
You answered my question in that an SRB does not wait. I guess I should have
just looked at the SMF manual , as I'm doing now, to better understand the
scope of what waits fall under JWT.
Thanks.
--- On Thu, 9/25/08, Tom Harper [EMAIL
First, you should be using the supported runtimes for COBOL2, and they
are in LE. Otherwise, results can be unpredictable. I believe the name
is hlq.SCEELKED.
Second, compiler options for the older compliers can influence the
binder behavior. I believe the ROT is RES DYNAM.
Third, what do you
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:29:46 -0700, Patrick Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tom,
I'm sorry, yes my below is poorly worded.
You answered my question in that an SRB does not wait. I guess I should
have just looked at the SMF manual , as I'm doing now, to better understand
the scope of what
Hello Hal,
First, this is not my system. We just do some near-system development. I do
not have anyway to influence the way my customer work.On systems I managed,
I climbed before y(K2) ...
Second, nop.
Third, the Cobol2 stub modules was 'not resolved' Although the Cob2lib was
in the syslib
Yes, there are things you can do if you are going from z/OS *to* z/OS. I
usually do not, which is what always causes my FTP heartburn :)
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, September 25,
You should also ensure that you protect CC with RACF so that you can control
its use (which should be 0 with Hyperswap).
FACILITY class and STGADMIN.ADR.COPY.CNCURRNT or STGADMIN.ADR.DUMP.CNCURRNT
profiles.
Also check your HSM settings.
John
- Original Message -
From: Paolo
Used Shark Available
We have an old Shark Dasd unit we would like to find a new home for. It has 3
usable Terabytes of space, PAV support, but doesn't have Flash Copy. It is a
2005-800. We would like to find someone to buy it - vendors are welcome to
call, however we would consider
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:55:21 +0200, R.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does it mean counterproductive ?
Assuming you really need the system and the system need in MSU is really
small you can do the following:
1. Assign small percentage (I've seen even sub-percent weights) despite
it is
I just got a notification from IBM called: White paper: Pinpointing
IPL-related tasks for automation
So I had to supply my information, name, rank, serial number,
Just to find out that it is a couple fo chapters from the ABCs of z/OS System
Programming Volume 2
So if you get this
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I just got a notification from IBM called: White paper: Pinpointing
IPL-related tasks for automation
So I had to supply my information, name, rank, serial number,
Just to find out that it is a couple fo chapters from the ABCs of z/OS System
Programming Volume 2
So if
All that I have seen have 'opt out' check boxes. Perhaps marketing still gets
some intelligence by interest levels, but I don't see any harm in that.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, September
On 25 Sep 2008 09:31:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Bielefeld)
wrote:
Used Shark Available
We don't get offers like that everyday.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
We currently use JOBTRAC as our scheduler and are planning to move to CA-
ESP. The question has come up about audit reporting. The attachment
shows the JOBTRAC report that is available and the audit trail log that comes
out of the ESP started task. We have been told that the information is
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:06:42 -0500, Tom Eden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently use JOBTRAC as our scheduler and are planning to move to CA-
ESP. The question has come up about audit reporting. The attachment
shows the JOBTRAC report that is available and the audit trail log that comes
out
As far as I can tell, there are no industry standards. It will take time
for the process to shake out and for good tools to appear on the
shelves.
Indeed, we crafted a solution we thought satisfied all of the
requirements only to have the requirements change.
From where I sit, it looks like
My ESP guy suggests that you join the ESP user group:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Eden
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA-ESP Audit Reporting
We
I am not very versed in jes2. I can not seem to find any decent
information on the subject. All of the jes2 lines
Defined in the shop are half-duplex. I am trying to find some
information as to which is better, meaning half or
Full. I have an ee connection to a disaster site, and they
All that I have seen have 'opt out' check boxes. Perhaps marketing still gets
some intelligence by interest levels, but I don't see any harm in that.
The real dishonesty is pointing to excerpts from existing RedBooks!
If it were something new, it would be a good thing.
-
Too busy driving to
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Carroll, William wrote:
I am not very versed in jes2. I can not seem to find any decent
information on the subject. All of the jes2 lines
Defined in the shop are half-duplex. I am trying to find some
information as to which is better, meaning half or
Full. I have
This is not really a jes2 subject. Rather, one of telecommunications.
Half duplex is less expensive and will work ok if the vast majority of
your traffic is one way. A printer, for example.
A full duplex line may be faster, but perhaps not enough to justify the
cost.
On the other hand, full
On 2008-09-22 at 17:40, Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to IBM-
Main:
Is there a way to scratch expired datasets without DFHSM or some other
storage manager? We create SMS datasets in DB2 that have an expiration
date automatically set. When the datasets expire, we want to scratch
I'm testing the process to upload a PSP bucket of ptf's using an uploaded CSI
to only get the ptf's I need. Everything seems to be working and I've got the
bin files on the mainframe. But when I try and unpack them I run into two
problems.
1. The job is abending with 878-08. Here is the
I just was sent this:
===
We have had two customers report failures while running Large Send
after installing the latest code levels on Driver 67 and 73 OSA Express2
EC streams. Once again this failure causes the OSA to lose
Bill,
I called up the online library,
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/zshelves10.html#zbop
and entered half-duplex into the search text box for JES2.
From thus I discovered that full and half duplex apply - as I rather suspected
-
only to Binary synchronous (BSC) lines. Thus I
Read OA19194 (I just did :-).
The z/OS provided AMATERSE uses now SYSUT1/2 for input/output.
Hth...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Schwartz
Sent: September 25, 2008 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Trsmain Unpack
Alan Schwartz wrote:
I'm testing the process to upload a PSP bucket of ptf's using an uploaded CSI
to only get the ptf's I need. Everything seems to be working and I've got the
bin files on the mainframe. But when I try and unpack them I run into two
problems.
1. The job is abending with
Jakubek, Jan wrote:
Read OA19194 (I just did :-).
The z/OS provided AMATERSE uses now SYSUT1/2 for input/output.
AMATERSE still provides the original TRSMAIN interface as well.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
..caught my eye...live in San Jose, CA...home of the SAN JOSE SHARKS, winners
of the next Stanley Cup...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Being a displaced Detroit native I do take exception to that...
Donnelly, John
P
From Dallas
We may need to check the STARS for the next winner!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Donnelly, John P
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Used Shark Available
..caught
Perhaps a key value of this medium is the inability to give bad advice.
And, when one does, all end up learning something.
What more could one ask? :-)
A virtual beverage on me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris
Is it Friday yet???
This could get nasty..
Particularly if there are hockey-moms and lipstick in the audience..
Cebell, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, but I don't really see the dishonesty in this marketing ploy.
The e-mail point-blank tells us that the information is lifted straight
from the redbook.
Not to pick on you specifically, Ted, because there have been several
people complaining on the list about how underhanded this whole
We are currently running Omegamon XE for z/OS Version 2 on z/OS 1.7.
The z/OS 1.9 Planning for Installation document #GA22-7504-18 states that
OM XE V2 products are not supported. Anyone continuing to run OM XE V2 for
z/OS on z/OS 1.9 and, if so, are there any big compatibility issues?
The e-mail point-blank tells us that the information is lifted straight from
the redbook.
Okay!
I didn't see/notice that.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
The z/OS 1.9 Planning for Installation document #GA22-7504-18 states that OM
XE V2 products are not supported. Anyone continuing to run OM XE V2 for z/OS
on z/OS 1.9 and, if so, are there any big compatibility issues?
I truly don't understand the question:
1. The documentation states that it's
After type the oput command see the message below :
IGD103I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME SYS00107
BPXF105E RETURN CODE 006F, REASON CODE 5B450002. AN ERROR OCCURRED
DURING
THE OPENING OF HFS FILE /DATA1.
***
... not be open the file why???
regards,
- Original Message -
From:
Claudio Marcio wrote:
After type the oput command see the message below :
IGD103I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME SYS00107
BPXF105E RETURN CODE 006F, REASON CODE 5B450002. AN ERROR OCCURRED
DURING
THE OPENING OF HFS FILE /DATA1.
***
... not be open the file why???
regards,
The error
I had managed to find the error ... see ..
Description
RSN_GCRE +
HFS_RSN_Access_Denied (X'0002')
RSN_GCRE_Access_Denied
The current (requesting) process does not have the requested access
authority to the file, or directory.
Cause: A higher access authority is being
Claudio Marcio wrote:
I had managed to find the error ... see ..
Description
RSN_GCRE +
HFS_RSN_Access_Denied (X'0002')
RSN_GCRE_Access_Denied
The current (requesting) process does not have the requested access
authority to the file, or directory.
Cause: A higher access
89 matches
Mail list logo
