Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Hi,
What tools and techniques are you using to move large tape (VTS
normally) resident data sets from one Sysplex to another?
We are creating our third Sysplex and see that in this case we are
going to have
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM would like to recall the message, TAPE to TAPE across
Sysplex local or remote.
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may
Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Hi,
What tools and techniques are you using to move large tape (VTS
normally) resident data sets from one Sysplex to another?
We are creating our third Sysplex and see that in this case we are
going to have
Dave Danner wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:53:31 +0100, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] it.COM.PL wrote:
Peter Relson wrote:
I can activate a check that was deactivated as well
as I can undelete check that was deleted.
That is not necessarily true.
Well...
This is want I wanted to learn more about.
I would check Cross sysplex manager (CSM) from HostSystems and Tape copy
product from OpenTechSystems.
Itschak
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Hi,
What
Thanks to all of you who have recommended
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am swapping over now.
regards
--
Mike Munro MBCS,CITP_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ornum Software Ltd (S) Tel/Fax:+44(0)7041 363 070
~Mobile: +44(0)777 160 1496
Hi
One of our users is writing a program that reads a variable record length RRDS
file.
He asked me if there is a way determine the actual record length of a
particular record.
Thanks
Gadi
--
For IBM-MAIN
I can activate a check that was deactivated as well
as I can undelete check that was deleted.
That is not necessarily true.
When is the above untrue ?
I choose not to answer fully. There is no reason that you should have to
know this.
My statement about the difference between deactivate and
Here is an example/model of COBOL program that
deals with variable length files, look for
variable RECL-INFIL:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
PROGRAM-ID.
AAAG001.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:06:43 +0100, Michael Knigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOFTWARE.DE wrote:
All,
subject says it all: Is anyone using GSF's TSO/E Exit IKJEFLN2 that is
availabel from CBT-Tape File 183? Is it safe to install it (--
somehow stable)?
Not anymore, since we changed to the RDP program. But
Ed Jaffe wrote
And, if IBM, ISV, and customer in-house developers would use
IgvInitGetmain and IgvInitFreemain on their test/development systems--as
we do--nobody would have experienced this issue to begin with. Of
course, it's hard to fault someone for not using an undocumented
feature. These
Sorry! Didn't saw it was about RRDS !
Disregard this...
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Thomas Berg
Skickat:
We have three sites, three ATLs, all Sun, set up in a cascade. Tapes
created in one site are replicated over IP to the other sites. No human
intervention once the configuration was set up.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer
Of course, once I hit enter I realized I had answered a question you did
not ask. Sorry about that.
To move data from one sysplex to another, we generally use ftp.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network Operations
Phone:
No they do not.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kathleen McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool
Hello Bob,
Do any of these volumes have the
We have physically shared, but logically partititioned VTS amongst our multi-
system and mono-plexes. For individual tapes, we make the tapes available to
other systems as needed, as Kees described.
For mass copies, such as datacenter consolidation or spinoff, we have set up
VTS PtP PPRC
Hi,
Subplexing was introduced in z/OS 1.8 (Networking) and in the
documentation I find
references to Networking, but nothing regarding other resource managers
(eg. RACF Security, MVS, consoles etc). Does Subplex grouping also
isolate groups of LPARS from a Security point of view, i.e.:
- is
Hi.
Since we started to run our new z10 model 711 and at the same time started
DB2 V9 new function mode, we have seen a dramatic increase in CPU
consumtion in our 4 production LPAR's.
We also have a feeling of not getting the rated performance out of the z10-
711
Has anyone seen or
Bob,
Are any of the volumes in question chained? I could be wrong about
this, but I believe that if you have multiple data sets on chained
tapes, and RETAINBY(S) is in Parmlib, then one or more of the volumes in
the chain can be in a scratch pending status but will not scratch until
all the data
Our shop also experienced an unexpected CPU consumption increase after
DB2 V9 last year. It's more likely 15% increase via DB2 batch on the
first day of upgrade, and was getting reduced gradually with additional
memory our DBA efforts. Finally we admitted approximate 8% increase
due to additional
Peter Relson wrote:
Ed Jaffe wrote
And, if IBM, ISV, and customer in-house developers would use
IgvInitGetmain and IgvInitFreemain on their test/development systems--as
we do--nobody would have experienced this issue to begin with. Of
course, it's hard to fault someone for not using an
I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module
coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I
had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SLIP trap
that specified as its DATA parameter (0R?,EQ,[module name]) and its RANGE
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:12 -0600 Adam Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module
:coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I
:had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SLIP
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:12 -0600, Adam Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module
coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I
had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SLIP trap
In a message dated 12/10/2008 10:36:19 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
testing organizations to use various TRAPs. The last time we exchanged
notes about what she was recommending, IgvInitGetmain was definitely
*not* on her list!
Haven't done development since S/1
However, the GTF trace is capturing all SVC 8 and 9 events for the
address
space.
What am I doing wrong? Can I not use a combination of GTF and SLIP to
specify my criteria???
Your GTF options are telling GTF to collect all SVC 8/9 for the job as well as
all
slip records.
No they are not chained, no movement, no loan location or VRS entry to
govern the volume.
Thanks
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:30:32 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
And, if IBM, ISV, and customer in-house developers would use
IgvInitGetmain and IgvInitFreemain on their test/development systems--as
we do--nobody would have experienced this issue to begin with. Of
course, it's hard to fault someone for not
Edward Jaffe wrote:
I have suffered through damaged HSM control data sets and other
corrupted files, PSF abends, TCP/IP and VTAM issues, RMF problems, JES
problems, systems that won't IPL or crash shortly after IPL, and
dozens of subtle and bizarre behaviors that eventually led to a
discovery
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
What are we on this list allowed to know about what the IgvInit*
traps do?
WE on this list? YOU are an ISV. Thus, you should already know all about
what these, and dozens of other, TRAPs do. They should already be
enabled on the systems where you develop and test your
What are we on this list allowed to know about what the IgvInit*
traps do? Realistically, the most one could expect is that
at GETMAIN/FREEMAIN (or newer counterparts?) random, unpredictable
data would be written over the affected storage with the intent
of causing program checks.
Since
I realize this is an evolving space. And, it's always possible that
things have changed enough, since I last asked, that your blanket
statement IBM does use these traps is now accurate. But, knowing IBM
as I do, I have my doubts. Case in point: If IBM was religiously using
IgvInitGetmain
Use of the
RECORD VARYING SIZE
in the FD phrase is valid for ALL organizations of files and does return the
record length during a READ.
??? ?? ??? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
.
Hi
One of our users is writing a program that reads a variable record
I am installing zos1.9 and need to create a new master catalog for it. I have
done an archive search for a jcl example but no hits. I created the job below
but would like some feed back if what I have is ok. Other JCL examples are
welcome. Thanks Matt
// EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,REGION=0K
Jim Mulder wrote:
In particular, IPCS-related code tends to be adept at avoiding being
tested with the traps. Since such code does not require authorization,
and can be run on any supported release via STEPLIB/TSOLIB, it tends
to get done on what you might call a development system. But
We do this with FTP over the Hipersocket link.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State Univsersity
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:07 PM
To:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:35 -0500, Matt Dazzo wrote:
need to create a new master catalog
The z/OS 1.8 ServerPac came with:
DEFINE -
MCAT ( -
ICFCATALOG -
NAME(name) -
VOL(vol) -
CYL(15 5) -
FREESPACE(10 10) -
SHR(3 4) -
STRNO(3) -
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:24:42 +0100, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From end-user point of view you delete check by P and undelete by E
action character in SDSF. As simple as H for deactivate and A for activate.
The manual does not explain the difference. The only topic related to
check deletion
Not only that, but CICS is developed--and I assume tested--in Hursley. I
suspect they, as well as Bvblingen, San Jose, Rochester, Perth, Raleigh,
Rome and other labs play from a different rule book than do the folks
in POK.
I don't know much about what goes on test-wise in Hursley. We
Hi, Krister
Here's a couple of links with capacity planning guidance for z10 processors,
from IBM's TechDocs site:
- General z10 capacity planning guidance:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD104738
- A discussion of the z10 feature called HiperDispatch mode (in
Hello All,
I've been asked a lot about CICS V2R3 and z/OS V1R10 ... and if it is
supported. I've been using the information provided in the z/OS R10
Planning for Installation book Appendix B to answer that question. Since
CICS V2R3 goes end of service on 30 Sept 2009, today I pushed back more on
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/05/2008
at 03:43 PM, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
SQA exhaustion?
Eventually.
GO ATTACH EP=GO worked pretty well too, back in the day.
But took more code.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:49:19 -0500, Jim Mulder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
...we consider those to be production systems,
and the systems programming and operations is contracted out to
IBM Global Services, and so we don't activate the traps on those
systems.
While not stated, I suspect IGS
Hi Everyone,
We have a user that recently installed a XEROX printer connected to a BARR
Print server, which is connected to the mainframe via TCP/IP.
Xerox DocuPrint (DP) 155C EPS Base system
Barr Enterprise Server
Barr/Print TCPIP Input Module
Barr/Print EPS option
On their old system,
I know that the double hardware failure delayed repair because the second
part had to ordered. No one else has suggested that the CPU slowdown
resulted from any cause other than heat. Here is a chart I obtained that
indicates the effect of rising temperature on CPU speed. I don't have the
source
Mary,
Have you Googled Xerox or Barr and JCL?
www.xerox.com
www.barrcentral.com
hth,
EdP
Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
12/10/2008 04:19 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Do you really need to 'move' tapes/tape files from one sysplex to another,
or do you just need to be able to access and manage any tape from any
sysplex?
Even before we had sysplex, we provided 'universal tape' through a
combination of channel extension and volser range segregation, exit code in
2008/12/10 Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know that the double hardware failure delayed repair because the second
part had to ordered. No one else has suggested that the CPU slowdown
resulted from any cause other than heat. Here is a chart I obtained that
indicates the effect of rising
Hi All,
In the REAL field in the DA users panel, you would sometimes see the 17T
in the display. I tried to find out what the T meant. The description
you get in the SDSF Operations and Customization manual is 'Current
storage usage in frames' Does anyone know what the T means? I would be
Hi,
When you see a T, it usually means that the field is not wide enough to show
all of the data.
Use the ARRANGE command to widen the field.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rahim, A. (Ahmed)
Sent: Thursday, December
Rahim, A. (Ahmed) wrote:
In the REAL field in the DA users panel, you would sometimes see the 17T
in the display. I tried to find out what the T meant. The description
you get in the SDSF Operations and Customization manual is 'Current
storage usage in frames' Does anyone know what the T means?
scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Where in storage are the symbols specified in IEASYMxx stored?
Looking to see if some system key is used, as well as storage protect
key, and subpool number.
Thanks!
I have no answer to your question, but out of
Are you sure: hipersocket links between sysplexes spread over remote
locations?
Kees.
Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
.
We do this with FTP over the Hipersocket link.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State Univsersity
Well, no, We are just LPARs in a CEC. Ut, FTP is a viable, if perhaps
to slow for all purposes, transport method.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:35 PM
To:
54 matches
Mail list logo
