I am out of the office until 15/06/2009.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 10
Jun 2009 to 11 Jun 2009 (#2009-162) sent on 6/12/09 12:00:00.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
All,
maybe this is a real dumb question but
We are running a ADCD based system (around 60 MIPS) and need to run a
job with a most powerless priority possible.
One of our jobs (a real big java program) is consuming so much CPU power
that working on the system is nearly impossible.
So
Sorted. The problem was a mismatch between the console definitions. The
CEE3739I message is the last one displayed on the NIP console and the system
then couldn't find a system console.
Jim McAlpine
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.comwrote:
The next messages in
Michael Knigge michael.kni...@set-software.de wrote in message
news:4a320c02.3080...@set-software.de...
All,
maybe this is a real dumb question but
We are running a ADCD based system (around 60 MIPS) and need to run a
job with a most powerless priority possible.
One of our jobs
Mark Zelden pisze:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:49:12 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
2. I solved it.
I received the product again by using RECEIVE BYPASS(ACCCHK APPCHK).
Then I was able to APPLY the product for another target zone.
I also changed OPTions to have NOPURGE, so
The answer is in WLM. There should be a Service Class with the lowest
possible goal, probably with a Discretionary Goal. Then there should be
Classification Rules that direct jobs to that Service Class, probably by
jobclass. Select that jobclass for the job, if you are allowed to, OR
reset the
William Bishop pisze:
This question is more about the tapes we created years ago before we went
to an SMS enviornment and how do sites clean-up tapes that sit for
several years that for the most part were from application sets that we no
longer run.
A second type would be for retired
Michael Knigge michael.kni...@set-software.de wrote in message
news:4a3215e0.7070...@set-software.de...
The answer is in WLM. There should be a Service Class with the
lowest
possible goal, probably with a Discretionary Goal. Then there should
be
Classification Rules that direct jobs to
Since you mentioned you're new to WLM, here are some quick
thoughts (some of them very simplified):
- You cannot directly set (CPU) priorities; this is WLM's duty.
- You assign work (jobs, STCs, TSO users, etc) to a WLM Service
Class (srvclass) using WLM's classification rules.
- Each service
Scott,
That's it! That is the line I was thinking about and wrongly attributing
to Fagin. Thanks for figuring out the reference I really meant to
convey. I still have a faint memory of the actor's voice uttering More
that played Mr. Bumble. Wasn't More repeated several times with
increasing
What I have working is the version in the unix directory, built under
USS as a Unix executable.
Thanks Bob, it is disappointing, but at least that explains the
differences I was seeing.
We don't have gmake installed, and so with make -f /unix/Makefile
Configure does not compile successfully
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am attempting to copy a direct access (DA) dsn from a 3380 to a 3390 using
DFDSS. To correct the problem as per the DOC is not very clear. Would anybody
please advise me how to fix this or should I need to open a problem ticket with
IBM?
Here is my JCL:
COPY
Thank you for the suggestions. I was discussing the problem a while ago with
the user and told them the products I've looked at have a default screen
size of 23x80 and it shoudl be 43x80. They finally checked and guess what it
was 23x80. Once thsy changed screen size it worked properly.
thanks
If you were to take Dave's approach, I wrote a REXX EXEC that will
execute the same edit macro against all members of a PDS or PDSE, given
the name of the PDS and the name of the macro as input.
Mike Myers
Dave Salt wrote:
This would be really easy to do in an edit macro. Here's the pseudo
Be aware that SDSF support for JES3 is incomplete. The manual documents which
functions will work and which will not.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:42:25 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Mark Zelden pisze:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:49:12 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
wrote:
2. I solved it.
I received the product again by using RECEIVE BYPASS(ACCCHK APPCHK).
Then I was able to APPLY the
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:05:48 -0400, Mike Myers m...@mentor-services.com wrote:
If you were to take Dave's approach, I wrote a REXX EXEC that will
execute the same edit macro against all members of a PDS or PDSE, given
the name of the PDS and the name of the macro as input.
See EDMACALL on my
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:53:58 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:42:25 +0200, R.S. wrote:
I thought about another OPTion set. GOPT for regular use, with NOPURGE,
and LASTOPT wit PURGE=YES. It seems to be quite easy and
non error prone.
I disagree. It is a manual step that can
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:58:50 -0500 Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
wrote:
:On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:05:48 -0400, Mike Myers m...@mentor-services.com
wrote:
:
:If you were to take Dave's approach, I wrote a REXX EXEC that will
:execute the same edit macro against all members of a PDS or PDSE,
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:13:08 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Agreed. Indeed, when you had to re-receive with bypass applycheck and
acceptcheck, you may have received some sysmods that had already been
applied and accepted everywhere. These will never go away unless you do a
Just to close out my question, the answers were to put apostrophe around
all of the CTRACE parms in CTIEZBxx
TRACEOPTS ON OPTIONS ('TCPMIN','IPADDR(xxx.xxx.yy.yy)')
and to print the CTRACE, I had to add the stack name:
CTRACE QUERY(SYSTCPIP) SUB((TCP name)) FULL LOCAL
Jack Kelly
You might also need a resource group to put a small max if the job is a
CPU burner. Single CP machines need this more than the multi CP folks.
Mike Wickman
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
On Friday 12 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
What I have working is the version in the unix directory, built
under USS as a Unix executable.
Thanks Bob, it is disappointing, but at least that explains the
differences I was seeing.
We don't have gmake installed, and so with make -f
Is there any combination of LE runtime options that will give a system dump
of the original abend and an LE message.
Jim McAlpine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Jim McAlpine wrote:
Is there any combination of LE runtime options that will give a system dump
of the original abend and an LE message.
Jim McAlpine
From our course Using LE Services in z/OS:
runtime parameter TER (which is short for TERMTHDACT)
takes one of these options:
TRACE — message
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
From our course Using LE Services in z/OS:
runtime parameter TER (which is short for TERMTHDACT)
takes one of these options:
TRACE — message to SYSOUT; abbreviated CEEDUMP
QUIET — no messages; no dumps
MSG
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:38:44 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:13:08 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
Agreed. Indeed, when you had to re-receive with bypass applycheck and
acceptcheck, you may have received some sysmods that had already been
applied and accepted everywhere. These will
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.comwrote:
I've tried the UA* options you mention above but the dump gets taked after
LE condition handling which means you get a U4039 abend which isn't much
use. Gonna try with UAIMM but that doesn't get you the LE message
IBM has a Share presentation called 'Diagnosing Application problems Under
Language Environment' that has what you need.
This is an old version available on IBM's website
http://tinyurl.com/n4f38t
If you have access to the Share handouts a newer one is available here
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:53 PM, David Waldman david.p.wald...@lmco.comwrote:
IBM has a Share presentation called 'Diagnosing Application problems Under
Language Environment' that has what you need.
This is an old version available on IBM's website
http://tinyurl.com/n4f38t
If you have
f255efe0ecf08c4a9c1db6aff42354170b2ff...@ch2wpmail1.na.ds.ussco.com
blu149-w54d5d1a4276a40b8967840a1...@phx.gbl
4a32449c.4040...@mentor-services.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2009 15:08:25.0847 (UTC)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:58:50 -0500 Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com
wrote:
:On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:05:48 -0400, Mike Myers
m...@mentor-services.com wrote:
:
:If you were to take Dave's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Language Environment runtime options and system dumps
SNIPPAGE
Interesting, but it doesn't really help
Have you considered setting up a SLIP TRAP ?
Gain financial freedom! Click here for Financial Advice.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTIlfhJh7Bc22IIw9mvkscA792rk8ozKjdRNafi9SUOGqcUCof0dby/
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com wrote:
Have you considered setting up a SLIP TRAP ?
It looks like I'm gonna have to. However I still don't understand why I'm
getting a U4039 abend when the manual
Jim McAlpine wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com wrote:
Have you considered setting up a SLIP TRAP ?
It looks like I'm gonna have to. However I still don't understand why I'm
getting a U4039
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
Hmmm. Do you have a SYSUDUMP, SYSMDUMP or (God forbid) SYSABEND
DD statements in the job step? Do you have some dump-intercepting
program in place (AbendAid, DumpMaster, etc.)? I always turn all
those off for our
Esmie,
This may not resolve your error, but I thought the dsn in REBLOCKADDRESS is
to refer to the source dataset and not the renamed target.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
esmie moo
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009
Ron,
I am doing a copy with the rename test to see if it works. The end user then
verifies the file via a CICS environment. I was able to copy other DA files
with no problem. I hit a roadblock with just 2 dsns.
--- On Sat, 6/13/09, Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
From:
Esmie,
AFAIK, you cannot copy a Direct-Access type dataset from one disk type
(3380) to another (3390) because of the differing track geometry / track
capacity.
To get this dataset moved, you will have to unload it to a sequential
dataset using a home-grown program that can read the data. Next
Tom Marchant pisze:
[...]
True, but Radoslaw had to re-receive service after he ACCEPTed into one of
his distribution zones. Some of that service that he received with bypass
applycheck/acceptcheck may have already been applied and accepted
everywhere. ZONEGROUP would not have helped him with
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Jim McAlpine wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com
wrote:
Have you considered setting up a SLIP TRAP ?
Ulrich,
IBM supports using the COPY option for DA dsns. These dsns have been around
for a long time. The dsn is not heavily used. According to the applications
support group this dsn is used about on a weekly basis.
--- On Sat, 6/13/09, Ulrich Krueger u...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Ulrich
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:23:39 +0100, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any combination of LE runtime options that will give a system dump
of the original abend and an LE message.
Jim McAlpine
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Sat, 6/13/09, Ulrich Krueger u...@pacbell.net wrote:
[...]
(Again, AFAIK and someone please correct me if I'm wrong ... none of the
standard IBM utilities can read or write DA.)
Yes, you are wrong.
One of the utilities that read/write DA is IEBGENER.
Just allocate DA and PS files and try to
Esmie,
I stand corrected on DFDSS and support of DA dataset copy between unlike
device types. It's been far too long since I had to deal with 3380-to-3390
conversion and DA datasets.
The ADR367E message seems to indicate that the track on your output volume
might be defective.
So, what type of
IBM support has really let me down on this one anyone out there able
to get this interface to work without 3 minute response time? In our
environment it can take up to 10 minutes to create a single volume. IBM
laughs and says yep it is slow and to upgrade my stand alone 2 GB
workstation.
For those that don't know, Mono is a project to make a clean room
implementation of Microsoft's CLR (the basis of .NET). Now, we have Java on
z/OS. Mainly to support things like WAS and other Java Application Servers
(JBOSS, TOMCAT, ...). So, I was just in an oxygen starved state and was
I've used it with fair success, but not for about 1 1/2 years. Our IBM
representative uses the command interface, not the GUI. Are you at the current
maintenance level? They ship upgrades very frequently.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
John,
I'm pretty sure its already available on z Linux, or could easily be built.
Porting to z/OS would probably be a nice challenge, given the lack of
essential GNU tool chain components and the fact that z/OS Unix is by
nature EBCIDIC. It's an interesting idea, but what specific
applications
We are considering merging our 4 Master 35 User Catalogs into a
manageable number and would like to ask the Group what preparatory work;
documentation/manuals they found that were helpful. What advise would you
give that you didn’t get and wish someone would have mentioned?
We all know how it
Well, as long as you can view the SYSLOG and look at output from jobs and
started tasks I would be happy.
Thank you.
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
Ramiro Camposagrado wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:23:39 +0100, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any combination of LE runtime options that will give a system dump
of the original abend and an LE message.
Jim McAlpine
Using TRAP(OFF,NOSPIE) should give you the
Paul Schuster wrote:
Well, as long as you can view the SYSLOG and look at output from jobs and
started tasks I would be happy.
You can view OPERLOG.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
Fortunately there is the command line utility that can do all gui
functions and not being a Windows geek I am willing to use it :-)
However viewing performance data is much more appealing in a gui
presentation rather than regenerating and correlating raw statistics
from a piped text file.
We
In a message dated 6/12/2009 2:07:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
You can view OPERLOG.
Does the SDF freeware on CBT tape still work? Last update is 2000 for z/OS
1.1.
**Shop Dell’s full line of Laptops now starting at $349!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Curiousity: Mono on z/OS?
John,
I'm pretty sure its already available on z Linux, or could
On 6/12/2009 at 2:53 PM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
John,
I'm pretty sure its already available on z Linux, or could easily be built.
Porting to z/OS would probably be a nice challenge, given the lack of
essential GNU tool chain components and the fact that z/OS Unix is by
nature
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:24:28 +0200, R.S. wrote:
In fact I started follow-on discussion about how to purge sysmods which
accepted everywhere. There are two ideas:
a) REJECT in mass mode - suggested by Mark Zelden
b) use another OPTion set with PURGE=YES for last ACCEPT.
That's REJECT PURGE, not
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:53 -0400, Kirk Wolf wrote:
It's an interesting idea, but what specific applications would it be
useful for?
Well, John did say he was oxygen starved. As for me, I'm always up for
a solution for which there is no known problem.
I'm surprised John didn't bite when I
Having gone through both 'merging' and 'splitting' over the years in
various environments for various reasons, I'm convinced that merging is by
far the more difficult task. You have little choice but to examine
painstakingly every entry in every catalog and make some tough decisions:
1. Which
I used the DFSMS Managing Catalogs manual and had no problems merging 2
catalogs into an existing catalog.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Arturo
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 2:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
FYI if anyone is interested in Clojure on z/OS: here's a thread on
our z/OS Open source Java forum on running Clojure in the z/OS JVM:
http://dovetail.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=731
Java's not perfect - but what language is *more* portable when it come
to running applications and libraries on
Why would porting Mono be any more difficult than porting Java? Aren't they
both bytecode runtime environments (not sure that's the correct term...)?
On 6/12/2009 at 1:50 PM, in message
4a32792b026d0007a...@sinclair.provo.novell.com, Mark Post
mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 6/12/2009 at 2:53
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:51:17 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:24:28 +0200, R.S. wrote:
In fact I started follow-on discussion about how to purge sysmods which
accepted everywhere. There are two ideas:
a) REJECT in mass mode - suggested by Mark Zelden
b)
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:57:39 -0700, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
Having gone through both 'merging' and 'splitting' over the years in
various environments for various reasons, I'm convinced that merging is by
far the more difficult task. You have little choice but to examine
I did say 'for various reasons'. Problems with user catalogs crop up
primarily when merging systems, such as corporate mergers or data center
consolidations even within a singe enterprise. OP may have a simple case,
but I would not assume 'no brainer' even if he's fortunate enough not to
need one
Also, if you use any variation of TRAP(OFF), don't expect COBOL programs to
always confirm to the documented behavior - when unusual things happen.
Don Poitras sas...@sas.com wrote in message
news:4a32a3dd.5...@sas.com...
Ramiro Camposagrado wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:23:39 +0100, Jim
On 12 Jun 2009 08:07:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:53 PM, David Waldman david.p.wald...@lmco.comwrote:
IBM has a Share presentation called 'Diagnosing Application problems Under
Language Environment' that has what you need.
This is an old version
On 1 May 2009 07:52:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Sidler
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the benefit of TRUNC(OPT) to me.
But then there's
Bill,
Good questions, but still not enough of them. There is also the concern
about do you have the devices needed to read the tapes after xx years? For
example, I know some shops still have a rack of 3420 round reels. They
haven't had a 3420 device for the past 10 years; but still have a rack of
71 matches
Mail list logo
