If so, you can send another message to lists...@bama.ua.edu and as the
body put the command
set ibm-main fullhdr
This is what I did some time ago. I don't think I have seen any
quoted printables ever since.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
Ed,
He certainly has the opportunity:
Changes in Workload License Charges with the zEnterprise
Tuesday, March 1, 2011: 4:30 PM-5:30 PM
Room 204BC (Anaheim Convention Center)
Speaker: Alan Sherkow (I/S Management Strategies, Ltd.)
The posted abstract doesn't cover it, as that was written prior
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
[ snip ]
But what COND says is execute if 4 is less than the return code. [
snip ]
Almost: Execute UNLESS 4 is less than the return code.
-jc-
I would have preferred something like this instead of the delivered IF..THEN
logic:
//S050 EXEC WHATEVER,RUNIF=(RC,LE,4,S010)
RUNIF=(RC,8,S010)
RUNIF=(RUN,S020)
RUNIF=(RUN,ANY)
RUNIF=(NOTRUN,S030)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
I haven't moved to using this thing yet.
I generally try to put RSU maintenance on for everything, so that if
I
need to use it, it will be up to date.
This hurking monster is blowing away (E37) my
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:11:40 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 10:11 AM, Donald Johnson wrote:
We used to use a program called KABOOM, which did not exist (as I suspect
with BLOWUP). One JCL statement, and a very prominent S806 abend.
We use:
//ABEND806 EXEC
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:26:12 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 1/17/2011 1:56 PM, Dave Salt wrote:
The response to the recent promotion of using SimpList for free during all of
2011 has been exceptional. The promotion finishes at the end of this
month, so
if you haven't signed up yet and don't
Sorry I meant my last post to be a private email.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
First of let me apologize for my OMVS ignorance. Other than using the basic
set it and forget it parameters of OMVS we have never had to touch it. Now we
are developing an app that may keep the mainframe around a long time that
provides and consumes Web Services.
Long story short, my
IMHO, things like XMITIP have a great place in business. Some of us work in
smaller shops, with limited hardware and software budgets. If I can find a
piece of 'freeware/shareware' that works, even with the qualification that
YMMV, if it fits my needs I will use it. I have found that the
One of the easiers way for the size is from ISH. Once you are in ISH, go
to the Options Tab, select option 1 (Directory List) and press enter. Make
sure you select (slash) File size and then press enter. Then for your
path, you can type /tmp/ and press enter. It should show you file size
If the file system is a TFS, you are pretty much out of luck, You will
possibly need to restart OMVS after modifying BPXPRMxx for the mount
point /TMP. Check the fine manuals. There is a parameter on the TFS
mount command the defines the VS allocated to /TMP. A remount of the
file system *MAY*
Similar to Gil's reply - skip if you've had enough...
I did test the following for all 4 execute STEPF conditions and some do not
execute STEPF conditions. It works correctly as far as I can tell.
Change the MAXCC=0 or the ',COND=ONLY' as required to test any condition
you want.
//JOBNAME JOB
And if your /tmp directory is located in a HFS-Filesystem please
check also whether all extents could be allocated (123).
If not, probably your appropr. 3390 is full. After freeing some space you
could give it try oncee gain or allocate a new extent using the confighfs
command.
ciao
If /tmp is on HFS, then use confighfs to expand it, like:
confighfs -x 10C /tmp
to add 10Cylinders to /tmp on the current volume
confighfs -xn 10C /tmp
to add 10Cylinders to /tmp on a new volume (HFS in this case must be SMS
managed!)
On 1/21/2011 2:33 PM, Adams, Tracy wrote:
First of let me apologize for my OMVS ignorance. Other than using the basic
set it and forget it parameters of OMVS we have never had to touch it. Now we
are developing an app that may keep the mainframe around a long time that
provides and
Tracy,
Did you do a 'ls -la /tmp' to make sure also hidden files (ie. starting with a
'.') are shown?
We use TFS for /tmp and doing umount / remount normally works perfectly to
clean it up...
Regards,
Erik.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Question from our sysprog group:
Is it true that most SFTP clients do not support certificates?
TIA
Bruce Wheatley
Senior Information Security Analyst
The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited
85 Richmond St. W.
Toronto, ON
M5H 2C9
(416) 365-8417
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:08:32 -0600, Robert Birdsall wrote:
Similar to Gil's reply - skip if you've had enough...
...
// IF (STEPA.RC = 4 AND STEPB.RC = 0 AND STEPC.RUN = FALSE AND
// STEPD.RC = 8 AND STEPE.RUN = FALSE) OR
...
Is it permissible to omit the continuation mark in col. 72
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:00:03 -0600, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net
wrote:
Even at the first GA release (2.0) one of the first steps after install is to
import the MSM CSI into MSM so you can maintain the product. Installing
maintenance and deploying it is an extremely somple process.
You
Beware of COND=ONLY to suppress execution. Decades ago, a
colleague did that, but a prior step ABENDed. Embarrassing
because it was my program. I've since used COND=(0,LE).
I've had terrible experiences using COND=ONLY and, to a lesser extent,
COND=EVEN. Always considered them the lazy
Thanks all. The ISHELL process allowed me to extend the directory to resolve
the problem. When the day is quiet I will try the unmounting and mounting
trick to see if the space gets cleaned up. The confighfs command returns that
it is not mounted as HFS and there are no entries in the
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:19 -0600, Arthur Gutowski aguto...@ford.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:00:03 -0600, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net
wrote:
Even at the first GA release (2.0) one of the first steps after install is to
import the MSM CSI into MSM so you can maintain the product.
If you're curious, use df -v /tmp to find out if it is TFS. Ours is.
df -v /tmp/
Mounted on FilesystemAvail/TotalFiles Status
/SYSTEM/tmp(/tmp)177416/204800 22177 Available
TFS, Read/Write, Device:2, ACLS=Y
-s 100
Filetag : T=off
Tracy,
If you do not have a mount point for /tmp in your BPXPRMxx parmlib
member(s), then that means you have it under the root which is not a good
idea at all. You can issue the MVS command D OMVS to validate what active
BPXPRMxx member(s) you are running off of. Then from there you can see
Bruce,
If you mean X.509 certificates, then no - the ssh2 spec does not include
support for X.509 *per se*.
The ssh2 spec does support public/private key authentication using RSA or
DSA keys.
*BUT* if you are using either IBM Ported Tools for z/OS OpenSSH 1.2 or Co:Z
SFTP with IBM PT 1.1, you
From: Tom Marchant at Compuware
Sorry I meant my last post to be a private email.
Here's part of the 'last post' that was supposedly meant to be sent 'privately':
It makes me wonder if he is serious and has frankly left me with
a much lower opinion of him. Here is his reply to me:
snip
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:47:58 -0600, Bruce Wheatley bwheat...@cds.ca wrote:
Question from our sysprog group:
Is it true that most SFTP clients do not support certificates?
I'm not sure they asked the question they really intended, so it would help
to know why they are asking the question.
Dave,
This public exchange is doing nothing to endear potential customers to want
to trial or purchase SimpList.
I am making my exchange totally public. Either trust the other ISV developers
or not. Most already have the skill set in-house to do
ISPF dialog development of similar capability
Here is the out put of the command:
# df -v /tmp
Mounted on FilesystemAvail/TotalFiles Status
/SYSTEM/tmp(OMVS.SYSA.TMP) 28518/576004294967265 Available
ZFS, Read/Write, Device:3, ACLS=Y
Filetag : T=off codeset=0
Aggregate Name : OMVS.SYSA.TMP
Bob,
I'm not the one who decided to launch these personal attacks in public, but I
will certainly defend.
Like you said, other ISV developers already have the skill set in-house to do
ISPF dialog development of similar capability should they choose to do so.
Which means it's a very risky
I do not have a mount of /tmp in my active BPXPRMxx member. Actually there is
no mounts at all in the member. I do have OMVS. Datasets for all the old
reliables... var, etc/ tmp
# df -v /tmp
Mounted on FilesystemAvail/TotalFiles Status
/SYSTEM/tmp
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SimpList (Was: DOWNLOADING PDS FROM MAINFRAME TO PC)
Dave,
This public exchange
Dave,
Is there a very polite way to question a person's integrity and motives?
Put yourself on their end of the conversation, and ask if you wouldn't
have been insulted.
Both Ed and Tom are long-term, well-respected members of this forum and
community. Both have contributed help (and code)
Steve,
If I put myself in their position I wouldn't have been the slightest bit
insulted. And even if I was, I wouldn't have aired my grievance on a public
forum. I didn't initially question their integrity, but I do now.
Dave Salt
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:33:45 -0500
From:
This is news? A formal announcement would be, but (a) it's The
Register and (b) it isn't saying anything we didn't already know...
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/01/12/ibm_zenterprise_zbx_update/
Tracy,
If that is the display for /tmp then it is ZFS, I would go with one of the
prior posters suggestion about zfsadm grow.
Rob Schramm
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Adams, Tracy tad...@cvps.com wrote:
I do not have a mount of /tmp in my active BPXPRMxx member. Actually there
is no
I'm curious. What did you find?
At 1/20/2011 03:47 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 1/18/2011 1:46 PM, David Cole wrote:
z/XDC release z1.12 is now fully available. Major new features include:
Installed and operational here. Already found a use for one of the
new facilities. Great job, Dave!
--
That's peculiar. Your display seems to indicate otherwise. In addition to the
mentioned D OMVS are you looking at the right members? See D PARMLIB for your
particular concatenation. I cannot imagine this, but do you have something
like /usr/sbin/mount -t ZFS -f OMVS.SYSA.TMP automated
I have been trying to access the past proceedings section on SHARE.ORG and get
a 404 Page not found message.
Is anyone else getting this error?
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Yes, I will be talking about this at Share as Bob pointed out:
Changes in Workload License Charges with the zEnterprise
Tuesday, March 1, 2011: 4:30 PM-5:30 PM
Room 204BC (Anaheim Convention Center)
This certainly qualifies as a change. During the week of Share will be the
first
time that
Thanks Walt.
Here's some words of explanation for the issue that generated the original
question:
We thought you could store everything in RACF, but we ran into this
problem:
If the SSH client end is not z/os (in this case WINSCP) and you export
it's public key, RACF on the server says it is
Lizette, it works for me.
http://proceedings.share.org/proceedings/
A little different than it used to be though.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I have been trying to access the past proceedings section on SHARE.ORG and get
a 404 Page not found message.
Is anyone else getting this error?
Lizette
snip
http://proceedings.share.org/proceedings/
...is working for me.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM
On 1/21/2011 10:40 AM, David Cole wrote:
I'm curious. What did you find?
Programmer can now (fairly easily) display storage being accessed in a
JES2-owned data space by an SRB-mode program.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
I'm betting you will use that a lot...
At 1/21/2011 02:36 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 1/21/2011 10:40 AM, David Cole wrote:
I'm curious. What did you find?
Programmer can now (fairly easily) display storage being accessed in
a JES2-owned data space by an SRB-mode program.
--
Edward E
twimc,
and I may be a newbie here,
but I'll vouch for Steve!
Hi Steve,
who knew?
so this is what my sysprogs are doing all day long that keeps them too busy to
return my emails...
hernandez
--- On Fri, 1/21/11, Steve Conway steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
From: Steve Conway
COND=EVEN and COND=ONLY only take effect when there is a system or user abend
returned, they have nothing to do with cond code checking.
If either failed to perform according to specs, I'd be raising cain with my
sysprogs in short order.
hernandez
--- On Fri, 1/21/11, Stan Weyman
I have an old Xerox 4635 Parallel Channel attached Xerox 4635 and hope to
have an all FICON Channel z196 by the end of the year. Am curious if anyone
has daisy chained Converters as follows:
Parallel channel Device with CU connected to ESCON converter which is then
connected ESCON to a FICON
right you are about the COND EVEN and ONLY use. I was thinking of another
issue when I inserted the 'lazy' comment. I've always considered the inverse
nature of COND checking to be a problem (if this condition is met, bypass this
step I think is the name of the game - I don't write much
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:28:51 +0100, Thomas Berg wrote:
I would have preferred something like this instead of the delivered IF..THEN
logic:
//S050 EXEC WHATEVER,RUNIF=(RC,LE,4,S010)
RUNIF=(RC,8,S010)
RUNIF=(RUN,S020)
This thread, like other long-running ones, has degenerated into a slanging
match over trivia.
As a matter of formal syntax COND= is not so powerful as IF-THEN-ELSE, and
assertions to the contrary do no credit to the logical prowess of those who
make them.
Anciently there was in fact a
52 matches
Mail list logo
