>What he said, but I would do both
>
>/*
>//
While a // definitely denotes the end of the JCL for the
current job, /* does not. /* terminates the current sysin
dataset (note that DLM= may denote a different sequence).
Why not put the data on the stack and use
address TSO "submit *"
from the
"Terri E Shaffer" wrote in message
news:...
> We currently have 3- 3330cyl page datasets defined per 3390-9 volumes
with PAV support turned on. My question revolves around the above
support and might be more of a personal opinion than technical one
So is it better performance to allocate 1 p
You first have to install FMID JBB772S.
ITschak
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Chokalingam Thangavelu <
thangavelu.chokalin...@wipro.com> wrote:
> We are planning to do a assessment that requires installation of this
> FMID JBB772S so that from the SMF Records we can find out how much of
> ou
Hi,
Usually service status is PINK and the lpars will generally disappear off the
CPC
Images page. Its possible there is already some logged into the SE.
The easiest way to get around this is to get the SE rebooted. This can be
done from the HMC, there is an option. Or get someone to open up th
Chris,
First of all, a small correction on my earlier post.
Our distributed VIPA's have the naming convention:
ab-dv1.mf.qual1.qual2 and not ab01-dv1.mf.qual1.qual2
Static and dynamic VIPA's have the same naming convention.
"mf" in the domain stands for "mainframe" ;)
All ip-addresses
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:37:29 +0800, Johnny Luo
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm parsing 42/6 SMF records to calculate number of write blocks at data set
>level. Test shows that for extended format ps data sets S42AMSWB and
>S42AMDWB contain invalid data. The value is extremely large and is obviously
>wrong. I
John wrote:
> At DR, we insist that the MF continues to have the identical IP
address.
Nice! I wish we had that, but, alas, it is not possible in our current
LAN-network.
Now we have to search for those who use an ip-address instead of a
dns-name,
because they have to change their settings in
Hi:
The considerations for CI/CA splits varies with either on-line or batch
processing. Here is some information from the CICS TS Performance Guide and
VSAM Demystified manuals that may be useful. Free space provides a tool for
deferring splits to occur.
>From CICS TS 4.1 Performance Guid
All good points.
Fortunately we are small. Just 6 MOD3s that are barely 20% full all the time.
Not much stress here :-D
We will probably go to 3 or 4 MOD9s and I think out TGNUM will be fine.
Thanks all
Lizette
-
>
>Make sure you have enough TGspace available, depending on how many Mod-9
John -
In the back of my head, I seem to remember reading something a while back
that poorly-coded (e, inefficient...) SMS ACS routines can cause delays in
allocation and it is difficult to pinpoint the CPU time used by the ACS
routines
because of where the ACS routines are running--it all
Make sure you have enough TGspace available, depending on how many Mod-9 and/or
mod-3's you plan on configuring.
Thanks
Ms. Terri E. Shaffer
terri.e.shaf...@jpmchase.com
Engineer
J.P.Morgan Chase & Co.
GTI DCT ECS Core Services zSoftware Group / Emerging Technologies
Office: # 614-213-3467
Ce
IIRC, once you go to LARGEDS format on *ANY* spool volume you cannot go back
(LARGEDS=FAIL) except via a cold start.
Can't think of anything else to worry about.
HTH,
z/OS V1.9
I am getting ready to move my spool from MOD3 to MOD9. I think the only thing
I have to do is change the spooldef
z/OS V1.9
I am getting ready to move my spool from MOD3 to MOD9. I think the only thing
I have to do is change the spooldef to LARGEDS=ALLOWED or ALWAYS and then
Allocate/$Snewspol/$Zoldspol
Is there anything else I need to worry about or review?
Lizette
Then you should be able to REC/APP/ACC JBB772S.
The easiest way is to look up the PSP bucket for your level of z/OS and look
for zIIP in the text
5694A01 ZOSV1R7JBB772S IBM zIIP Support BCPZIIP
Lizette
>
>Hi,
>
>This is for Z/OS 1.7 and I have only HBB7720 in our Global Zon
Gaur
It looks like it might be a *problem* rather than an *issue* to me. Perhaps
the *issue* is that you have a *problem* and you would like some help.
First let me mention that this appeared in Google Groups but did *not* appear
in the IBM-MAIN archive. This suggests to me that you are using a
Hi,
This is for Z/OS 1.7 and I have only HBB7720 in our Global Zone.
I found the attached list when I searched in the net for JBB772S.
Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu
TWUL Mainframe Support
Thames Water IS
In Partnership with Wipro Technologies
Mobile: +91(0)-96864 33224
-Original Message--
You need to receive the FMIDs for the version of software you are running.
If you have HBB7730 you do not do HBB7740, HBB7750; unless you are running all
those different releases of z/OS.
I would just receive the JBB772S and see if it goes in.
What version of z/OS will this be for???
Go look
Hi,
I have not received the function yet.
I need receive HBB7730,HBB7740,HBB7750 and
JBB773J,JBB774J,JBB775J,JBB77S9 along with JBB772S .
Please let me the below Syntax is correct as I have done before.
SET BOUNDARY(GLOBAL).
RECEIVE FORFMID(HBB7730,HBB7740,HBB7750,JBB772S,JB772S etc..)
SET BOU
- Original Message -
From: "Hal Merritt"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: Weird INTRDR with REXX JCL steps
Add a // or /* as the last statement of the job.
What he said, but I would do both
/*
//
Regards,
Tom Conley
---
> UA23218 NOT RECEIVED PTF
This PTF is for FMID HBB7709. On our system, that is superceded by HBB7740.
I don't know about the rest of your system levels, but if the PTFs are for
related FMIDs of multiple releases, then SMPE should receive only the ones
that are applicable to your system.
Have you REC/APP/ACC the Function JBB772S yet? If not, that is the first step
in getting the PTFs for it on.
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: Chokalingam Thangavelu
>
>We are planning to do a assessment that requires installation of this
>FMID JBB772S so that from the SMF Records we
In a message dated 11/10/2009 12:40:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com writes:
always put in a /*EOF as well. Nothing like being paranoid!
>>
NO GOATS, NO GLORY! Whatever happened to debugging? Write the output to a
file and see what you got both ways and compar
Chokalingam Thangavelu wrote:
> We are planning to do a assessment that requires installation of this
> FMID JBB772S so that from the SMF Records we can find out how much of
> our current general processor workload can be processed by specialty
> processors like zIIP and zAAP.
>
> We have found out
>It appears that when I try to submit the second job through the INTRDR the
>SYSTSIN in my REXX step of the second job gets lost.
Although you have already found a work-around, I suspect you were not
writing all of the lines from your REXX code. Did you also close the OUTFIL DD
by including the
We are planning to do a assessment that requires installation of this
FMID JBB772S so that from the SMF Records we can find out how much of
our current general processor workload can be processed by specialty
processors like zIIP and zAAP.
We have found out that FMID JBB772S requires to enable tha
Before you do either of the below, try apar OA18452.
INITIMP=E may halp
Not sure about increasing the general DASD pool.
HTH,
Subject: CPU Uncaptured overhead
We have a little z800 2066 with 350 mips and a reported uncaptured CPU
overhead percent in the 15-18% range.
We modified WLM to halve
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:37 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Weird INTRDR with REXX JCL steps
>
> Add a // or /* as the last statement of the job.
Add a // or /* as the last statement of the job.
There used to be some issues where JES did not know if the submitted job stream
was complete or not. The // or /* statement was a definitive delimiter for the
job stream.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:i
Changing this to use the PARM actually seems to have fixed this issue.
Although I have no idea why this wouldn't work the other way? But I'll
incorporate this in the future.
Thanks for the tip.
C. Todd Burrell, PMP, MCP
Lead z/OS Systems Programmer
ITSO
(404) 723-2017 (Cell)
-Original M
How do MKPERM looks like ?
(If the JCL is not in MKPERM but read from somewhere we
need to see that file.)
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Todd,
In SDSF enter INPUT ON to see of the systsin is empty or not. But the best
way is to enter the exec name as a parameter to IKJEFT01 (e.g. //stepx exec
pgm=ikjeft01,parm=mkperm,...).
ITschak
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Todd Burrell wrote:
> I'm having a strange JCL/REXX issue that I
I'm having a strange JCL/REXX issue that I am hoping someone can help with.
I am running one job that does a listcat, and then depending on the RC from
the listcat, it will run the final step of the first job which is a REXX exec
that
submits JCL to the internal reader. Here is the JCL for th
We have a little z800 2066 with 350 mips and a reported uncaptured CPU overhead
percent in the 15-18% range.
We modified WLM to halve the number of services classes supported and this did
not seem to reduce the overhead percent.
IBM has suggested that initiator delay time SMF30ICU is due to DAS
Maarten
I don't believe name servers were designed for the purposes of "keeping track"
of intranet addresses.
Their primary purpose - and sole purpose until I am persuaded otherwise - is
to provide an indirect reference for people who need to specify destination
addresses so that, if the addre
John
> We don't have our mainframe in our DNS. The DNS people don't want to be
bothered with it.
And quite right they are too. Now *applications* would be a different matter.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:20:11 -0600, McKown, John
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainf
Srinivas
A "mainframe" - by which you may mean a "Central Electronic Complex" (CEC)
or "Central Processing Complex" (CPC) or, in the approximate terminology of
casual conversation, a "footprint" - doesn't have a name. Neither does an
individual LPAR running in the CEC/CPC. Only IP *interfaces*
>I'd read that as a replacement for the Crypto cards indicated. Not a new z
>machine.
A couple of weeks ago, IBM's CFO stated in a conference call that the z11 would
be out in 4Q2010.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
>Being a small shop our naming standards are a bit freer. We use "titan"v just
>as a reminder to show the squatty boxes who's boss. :-)
The last shop I was in just used the 4-character system name.
Since the only people who had to know were TSO users, and they had to know the
system they were
In a message dated 11/10/2009 9:56:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,
g...@gabegold.com writes:
at undergraduate and graduate levels. …" A longtime IBM
mainframe flagship, the school is now a hub of worldwide mainframe
education, both on campus and via distance learning.
>>
Location, locatio
A concern? Yes. A big concern? No.
Your determination of free space should include your expected (or observed)
insert activity, the initial population, and the distribution of new records.
That said, I wouldn't spend a lot of time on the estimates.
My $0.02
-Original Message-
Fro
Historic Marist College Embraces Mainframe's Future
by Gabe Goldberg
Just over a century ago, the Marist Brothers arrived in New York's
Hudson River Valley to train young men to continue the brothers'
vocation as great educators. What started as a seminary for training has
become a leading col
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Allan,
I don't read that announcement that way. I read it that the crypto
express2 card is being withdrawn on Dec 31 and that will be the date the
crypto express3 card will be made available. Interestingly, the
announcement letter this one references said the crypto expr
Hi,
I'm parsing 42/6 SMF records to calculate number of write blocks at data set
level. Test shows that for extended format ps data sets S42AMSWB and
S42AMDWB contain invalid data. The value is extremely large and is obviously
wrong. I also compared my program with DAF. For extended ps data set DA
Staller, Allan pisze:
... A replacement product will be available on December 31, 2009.
Reading between the lines is the "z/11" imminent?
I checked "imminent" in my dictionary - and YES it is, ...but it is NOT
mentioned in the newsletter.
We only know that new type of crypto cards replaces t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Arun shan
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: About plan and package
>
> hai can any one help me?
>
> i compiled cobol-db2 program when the
hai can any one help me?
i compiled cobol-db2 program when the execution time it gave -805 sqlcode
for one stored procedure..
that stored procedure program already in the data set x.x.program
and the corresponding dbrmlib in ..dbrmlib
some one copied the program and compiled in d
We currently have 3- 3330cyl page datasets defined per 3390-9 volumes with PAV
support turned on. My question revolves around the above support and might be
more of a personal opinion than technical one So is it better performance
to allocate 1 per volume, 3 per volume per 3390-9 and/or wha
Allan,
I don't read that announcement that way. I read it that the crypto
express2 card is being withdrawn on Dec 31 and that will be the date the
crypto express3 card will be made available. Interestingly, the
announcement letter this one references said the crypto express3 was
supposed to be a
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:38 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: z/11 imminent?
>
> ... A replacement product will be available on December 31, 2009.
>
>
... A replacement product will be available on December 31, 2009.
Reading between the lines is the "z/11" imminent?
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10577_5852_137980_email_DYN_1IN/ffwp64
209573
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10577_5852_138666_email_DYN_1IN/ffwp64
209573
---
Being a small shop our naming standards are a bit freer. We use "titan"
just as a reminder to show the squatty boxes who's boss. :-)
Rex
>
> Hi,
>
> We want to have a DNS Name for our new Z10 BC mainframe. Any
> suggestions?
> Please also share your Mainframe names.
>
> Regards,
>
A CI split (unless it forces a CA split) involves very little extra
overhead - like typically an extra Data CI write and Index CI write. A
CA split on the other hand means you have to physically move half the
Data CIs in the old CA to another CA. For a 3390 cylinder CA and 4KiB
Data CISIZE, that m
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Maarten Slegtenhorst
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:10 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: No mainframe dns : Was: RE: Z10 BC DNS Name
>
> John,
>
> During a disaster recove
These notes from my old paper on z/OS Resource Accounting
have not been updated in several years, but I believe they
are still correct with regard to what is counted where.
Barry Merrill
PRINTERS
The TYPE6 record data in the PDB.PRINT data set provides the data needed
to distribute the cost of
John,
During a disaster recovery, we move the dns-name to the new ip-address,
so nobody has to change anything. ( except maybe for a local dns-flush )
What do you do when a DR occurs?
Do the users change the destination ip-address on their servers and
workstations?
--
Maarten
-Oorspronk
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:52 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Z10 BC DNS Name
>
> >The DNS people don't want to be bothered with it.
>
> Why is it up
On 11/09/2009 02:18 PM, Dibitu wrote:
> On 9 nov, 06:16, jcew...@acm.org (Joel C. Ewing) wrote:
...
>> The inclusion of the always-true "STEPNULL.RC= 0 AND" portion of the
>> statements is irrelevant as to whether the statement is acceptable.
>> JC Ewing
>>
>> On 11/07/2009 08:28 AM, Birger Heede
We used to have a lot of different names, depending on the business unit
where the host originated.
Most of our dns-names are nowadays something like
.qual1.qual2 or .qual1.qual2 where
qual1.qual2 is the common denominator.
So I requested my own domain mf.qual1.qual2 and gave every host a
dns-na
>The DNS people don't want to be bothered with it.
Why is it up to them?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
>In today's world with lots of cache in modern DASD systems, are CA splits
still a concern?
>Or should I just allocate KSDSs with FREESPC(00 00) and save the space?
It's discussed in the RedBook "VSAM DeMystified", but the general concern is no
longer applicable, even though some old-timers here
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of SrinivasG
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:51 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Z10 BC DNS Name
>
> Hi,
>
> We want to have a DNS Name for our new Z10 BC mainframe. Any
> s
Hello,
In the old days,CA splits were quite detrimental to performance of VSAM
applications.
In today's world with lots of cache in modern DASD systems, are CA splits
still a concern?
Or should I just allocate KSDSs with FREESPC(00 00) and save the space?
All thought appreciated.
Barry.
--
Hi folks,
I am trying to get to the bottom of the Communications Storage Manager
(CSM - z/OS 1.9) parameter FIXED. I understand the ECSA parameter,
because I know where and how big our ECSA is.
But what I don't have a clear understanding about, is the FIXED parameter.
1.Is the FIXED parame
Hi,
We use,
MVS1.xxx.net
MVS5.xxx.net
MVS7.xxx.net.
Where xxx is company name.
Keep the DNS name closely related or identical to the system name. It will
make your life easier.
These defined to the internal network (that is 10.x.x.x ip address) only.
They are not accessible from the outside w
Responding to Benyamin Dissen's contention that "millicode should be way faster
than open code", Edward Jaffe wrote
|
| Why? Millicode uses the same instruction pipeline, the
| same execution unit, etc.
|
This is certainly and tritely true; but, as EJ knows very well, millicode has
available
Disclaimer: This question regards 2074 device and PCOMM 3270 session
icons - so it related to mainframe.
Now the problem:
I need to configure several PCOMM sessions on 2074 desktop (local ones).
(Caution: I already configured 2074 as a "server", now I'm talking about
*client* sessions).
I crea
Hi,
We want to have a DNS Name for our new Z10 BC mainframe. Any suggestions?
Please also share your Mainframe names.
Regards,
_
Srinivas G
CAUTION - Disclaimer *
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDE
Thanks to all who replied. I made space on the Master Catalog volume and the
RMF Sort went through.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 8:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
68 matches
Mail list logo
