Hi Kurt,
We have recently migrated two sites from CA-Sort to DF/Sort. The only real
issues you can run up against are when the site decides to use the sort exits
because they are not compatible. Other than that, they are fairly
interchangeable.
We probably do 10 or more of these migrations
We migrated to DFSORT from CA-Sort a year ago. One of the issues we faced was
the different translation table used to by CA-Sort to collate EBCDIC as ASCII.
We had
to setup a translation table in DFSORT which behaved the way CA-Sort's did.
A special thanks goes to Frank Yaeger and his team for
That is it. It is using the hardware clock as though it is Z / UTC /
GMT, as it is supposed to. Reset the hardware clock to GMT and put in
the right offset EST5EDT and you will get GMT there.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:03 AM, George Rodriguez
george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org wrote:
Hi
Rick Fochtman wrote:
What do you call 100,000 lawyers buried chin-deep in concrete?
Why chin-deep? Why not the whole body? ;-D
Ok: I'm off... too much noise... ;-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN
Hello members,
We are facing this issue for last few days , I ended up adding space to the
respective Storage Groups , still it persists .
VAMEX37 NVF411 P1OPSBP.FC610.NVFF411A SECONDARY EXTENT DOUBLED 400
IEC614I EXTEND FAILED - RC 000, DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IS (04034379) , 490
NVF411A,
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2R171/6.9.1
x'0403' - VDSS detected an error.
x'4379' is VDSS1 VDSS2
quote
VDSS error reason code (low order 2 bytes). For a description of the
VDSS1 and VDSS2 field values, convert the reason code to decimal and
see Storage
NO NO NO again. What I did was prove by 'reductio ad absurdum' that if
the premiss/assertion On input, the order of override priority is
program DCB - JCL DCB - dataset attributes is true then its
consequences are absurd: therefore the premiss/assertion is false.
Please note that, at the
Which kind of file are you allocating?
And what are allocation space options?
Have you tried specifing
//*VAMBYPAS* DD DUMMY
Regards.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
-snip
Too many #%$# lawyers with too much free time and too little to do.
But on the positive side (ever the optimist), perhaps it's
IEC032I
E37-08,IFG0554P,NVF411,NVF411A,SORTOUT,620F,BTCP51,04034379,P1OPSBP.FC610.NVFF411
Did you even attempt to look up this message?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
snip
Doesn't anyone read posts any more? g
I mentioned that I tried ARRANGE and it gave me an error.
/snip
I have had that problem with several filed names. Try arrange ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi ,
This is the JCL code
//NVF411A EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSOUTDD SYSOUT=*
//STEPLIB DD DSN=SYS1.SORTLIB,DISP=SHR
//SORTWK01 DD SPACE=(CYL,(100,100),RLSE),UNIT=DISK
//SORTWK02 DD SPACE=(CYL,(100,100),RLSE),UNIT=DISK
//SORTWK03 DD SPACE=(CYL,(100,100),RLSE),UNIT=DISK
So what?
Did you look up the messages?
I think I know what your (basic) problem is, but I'll leave it as an exercise
for the student.
I shall NOT hold your hand and lead you to the promised land.
Especially since you APPEAR to refuse to do any research.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter:
In 4e386bfb.7030...@acm.org, on 08/02/2011
at 04:28 PM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org said:
To almost take pride in not having the time to consult appropriate
references, and yet at the same time be adamant that you are right
and others wrong when they have,
Some of us[1] have read not only
In
caeajr1jeew6zsw7u_dgukgt6z1d--dtthl7wjcfszhyo+kk...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/02/2011
at 04:06 PM, Sandro Ambrozic sandro.ambro...@gmail.com said:
In TSO EDIT, check if the dataset (or member) has 'PACK ON' active
(PROFILE command),
There's no PACK in TSO EDIT. He's using ISPF/PDF EDIT.
--
In 4e37505a.7090...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/02/2011
at 02:18 AM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
What I would expect, if the program's DCB attributes 'overrode'/'took
precedence over'/etc. those of the physical dataset on DASD, is that
the attributes in the dataset's DSCB on DASD would be
In 4e38932c.2030...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/03/2011
at 01:15 AM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
... but open for output, followed by write, works - whereas open for
input, followed by read, doesn't (it fails with an I/O ERR): that
is a fact, not an opinion.
No, it is not a fact. It is a
In 0de6a9840123e547b061ac5b6765c02608e...@exmb-05.ad.wsu.edu, on
08/01/2011
at 11:03 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu said:
I really don't understand why anyone wouldn't be satisfied with
Softcopy Librarian?
Sure you do.
Yes, it's Windows only
Aha!
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In
CAApqkjs0AW1kP=-jorgzgf0nbrh-e3ujd63vajovyd_nfdb...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/02/2011
at 08:12 AM, George Rodriguez
george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org said:
When an email is sent out from the Mainframe, the time stamp on the
top of the email is wrong.
What is the complete contents of the
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 8/2/2011 3:11 PM, CM Poncelet wrote:
this. But in any case the BDW and RDW would not be loaded into
the buffer.
The BDW and RDW are always included in the buffer. They may not be
seen at the application level (e.g., on a ForTran read or write, or in
CoBOL).
Hi Seymour,
As it turns out, the Rexx EXEC that I was using, XMITIP from Lionel B. Dyck
has a sub-module called XMITIPCU that allows me to change the time if I
don't want to use GMT. The routine is called tzone_NM() and what I did was
changed this:
TZone_NM:
PROCEDURE
/* the result returned
George,
Perhaps the timezone setting for z/OS Unix System Services is set incorrectly.
Login to either TSO OMVS or telnet directly, and issue the 'date' command:
# date
Wed Aug 3 08:00:25 CDT 2011
#
Does it show the correct time and
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:25:38 -0500, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Ok how about something like this?
/* REXX */
input_number = 27
XSTRING = D2C(input_number)
XTABLEI = '0102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0F101112131415161718191A'x
XTABLEO = ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
X = TRANSLATE(XSTRING,XTABLEO,XTABLEI)
say X
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:38:40 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
The BDW and RDW are always included in the buffer. They may not be
seen at the application level (e.g., on a ForTran read or write, or in
CoBOL).
Well yes, they have to be loaded into VS to be processed. In the
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:06:31 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
NO NO NO again. What I did was prove by 'reductio ad absurdum' that if
the premiss/assertion On input, the order of override priority is
program DCB - JCL DCB - dataset attributes is true then its
consequences are absurd: therefore the
I am proving by 'reductio ad absurdum' that if the assertion is true,
then its consequences are absurd: and hence that the assertion is false.
You are discussing the absurd consequences which would follow from the
assertion being true. The point I am illustrating is that you cannot
impose a
Try http://www.rexxinfo.org
This site shows the current incarnations of REXX (Object Oriented and
traditional) available for Windows (and many other platforms) and has links to
relevant forums, support groups, etc.
--
For
I have read the manuals and I reference them when *necessary*, I have
also read *some* of the code (howbeit by disassembling it), I do not
'take pride' in not having the time etc. (because I actually do *not*
have the time to consult references which have no relevancy to the work
I am
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 4e38932c.2030...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/03/2011
at 01:15 AM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
... but open for output, followed by write, works - whereas open for
input, followed by read, doesn't (it fails with an I/O ERR): that
is a fact, not an
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:20:22 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
I am proving by 'reductio ad absurdum' that if the assertion is true,
then its consequences are absurd: and hence that the assertion is false.
What consequences? In what way are they absurd?
Hint: To show that something is absurd, it is
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:41:56 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
But I should get *no* I/O error at all on read if the DCB precedence
rules for output apply also to input, as is asserted (... not by me).
Of course you should get an I/O error on read if you specify a
blocksize that is inconsistent with the
Years ago a man named Mark Thomen (I miss him and his wisdom) probably
would have Relson-ed this thread days ago.
all snipped
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Oh and just in case your mainframe only supports secure ftp, it should be noted
that Softcopy Librarian doesn't. In that case you will need an ftp client
proxy. There are a few to choose from, but one that was simple to implement
and supports both Linux and Windows can be found at
CM, Wrong again (but should we be surprised)! The RDW is indeed part of
the logical record and is returned by the access method as part of the
logical record on input and expected as part of the record on output.
Some higher level languages (for example,COBOL) hide this from the
programmer
Hi
The set up in our environment is that applications running in Websphere
Application Server (WAS) address spaces on z/OS run SQL against DB2 on z/OS.
I am trying to correlate the CPU time (field SMF1209CI) I get from WAS SMF type
120 subtype 9 records and the DB2 class 1 CPU time (MXG field
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:11:27 +0100, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk wrote:
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
His example used RECFM=FB, so there are no BDWs and no RDWs (if there
were, then the first four bytes of the second record would be the RDW,
not data).
Yes
Aw, at least give the guy a hint. Change the SORTOUT DISP to
DISP=(NEW,CATLG). When you have to diagnose allocation problems,
deleting the dataset on ABEND is a bad idea as the dataset typically
gets wiped on the failure and you can't even use ISPF 3.4 or any other
tools to check on how much
If expressed that way, I have no choice but to accept that BANANA
overrides SYSDA - although that is not the interpretation of 'override'
I am referring to.
If expressed as BANANA prevails over SYSDA, then I disagree - because
BANANA would fail with a JCL error and would therefore not
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
CM Poncelet
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CORRUPT PDS - I/O ERROR
... I translate my thoughts into words and for this I use whatever
Good Day To All,
I am doing a review of all our ML1 volumes (8 SDSP and 8 NOSDSP) and I noticed
that 2 volumes out of 8 SDSP volumes the SDSP dsns were empty. I checked
the ARCCMD9
member and they were defined as NOSDSP. There was a comment to say that they
were changed from SDSP to NOSDSP
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:20:22 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
I am proving by 'reductio ad absurdum' that if the assertion is true,
then its consequences are absurd: and hence that the assertion is false.
What consequences? In what way are they absurd?
The absurd
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:03:21 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
If expressed that way, I have no choice but to accept that BANANA
overrides SYSDA - although that is not the interpretation of 'override'
I am referring to.
Feeding this troll is a waste of time. He insists upon providing his own
meanings
# date showed:
# date
Wed Aug 3 18:42:03 UTC 2011
#
# echo $TZ showed:
UTC0
#
and this is what's in /SYSTEM/etc/rc:
# Initialization shell script, pathname = /etc/rc
#
#LICENSED MATERIALS - PROPERTY OF IBM
#5694-A01 (C) COPYRIGHT IBM CORP. 1993, 2001
#
# Initial setup for z/OS UNIX
Rohit,
Your input dsn and output dsn is the same. Your output dsn is the same name as
the GDG base P1OPSBP.FC610.NVFF411A. Verify your output dsn.
--- On Wed, 8/3/11, Rohit Bhandari storage.mainfr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rohit Bhandari storage.mainfr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: IEC614I
You cannot have two 'logic sets' - one for output and another for input.
If output hits no I/O error then input hits no I/O error. Otherwise your
single assertion, applicable both to output and input, is flawed -
because it has two possible outcomes. It is 'along the lines of'
asserting that:
You might want to look at those two dataset names again.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
willie bunter
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEC614I EXTEND FAILED - RC 000,
'override' includes 'over' and 'ride' - and 'ride' is ambiguous.
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:03:21 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
If expressed that way, I have no choice but to accept that BANANA
overrides SYSDA - although that is not the interpretation of 'override'
I am
Willie,
Not quite. I thought the same thing when I first looked at it, but then
noticed 1 character difference in the two DSNs. Last character of the high
level qualifier.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
willie
Google me this.
While processing a job step that has duplicate DDNAMES coded and
at least one of the DDNAMES points to a JES data set (SYSIN,
SYSOUT, etc.) an extend failure can occur. This error occurs
when the non-JES data set is attempting to extend to a second
volume and this candidate
Can you try to increase unit from unit=sysda to unit=(sysda,20)
it's only a sample but this space error except for vam message may seems too
easy to solve...
and if I can, I'd suggest you to read sort manual to setup properly your
statement i.e. using dynalloc and usize command.
regards
Rex
You are spot on. Sorry Rohit.
--- On Wed, 8/3/11, Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com wrote:
From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com
Subject: Re: IEC614I EXTEND FAILED - RC 000, DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IS
(04034379)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, August 3,
Sometime ago I had a S/A dump that was created after a wait state occurred
during an IPL. I was able to view the dump on IPCS.
Now, after a few weeks have passed and having re-create the S/A dump after
getting the same Wait state , IPCS is unable to locate the CVT.
Anyone have an idea why IPCS
No CVT is often a sign that the SA Dump is no good.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:46:10 -0700, John Norgauer
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Sometime ago I had a S/A dump that was created after a wait state occurred
during an IPL. I was able to view the dump on IPCS.
Now, after a few weeks have passed and having re-create the S/A dump after
We have been asked to remove CA-PDSMAN from our Mainframes. Looking around I
haven't found much for replacements. We currently use the following features
of PDSMAN.
Ezyedit
Fast Copy
Member archiving
LLA extensions
Scan and Replace
Member Titles
Does anyone have any suggestions for
On 8/3/2011 8:38 AM, CM Poncelet wrote:
Well yes, they have to be loaded into VS to be processed. In the
case of block read/writes they precede the data records in the
buffer. But whatever was being discussed at the time I wrote
that had to do with record read/writes, in which case the BDW
and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
[ snip ] I guess the logical
corollary of CM expecting it to be reasonable to raise an IBM PMR to
eliminate errors caused by user misuse of JCL DD or program DCB
parameters would be to expect IBM to
Yep, Shmuel we have a couple customers asking for a 'generic' wilbur or roscoe
type interface.
It amazes me that people are still using Wilbur or Roscoe..
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To:
Either that or he thinks he is executing IEHPROPHET.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
[ snip ] I guess the logical
corollary of CM expecting it to be reasonable
I have 5 LPARS currently running DFHSM. I have just added a Sixth LPAR where
we do not want to run DFHSM due to constraints we are placing on this LPAR.
I ran a test on what would happen with DFHSM not running on a RECALL.
When I issued the command, it placed the request on a queue.
So, the
Take a look at Chapter 7 (Defining Data Classes) in DFSMSdfp Storage
Administration (SC26-7402).
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lim Ming Liang
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:01 PM
To:
Ezyedit can be replaced by SimpList. See the link in my signature or let me
know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:44:09 -0500
From:
Is this in a parallel sysplex?. If no, then the answer is *NO*. The request
will be queued.
If a parallel sysplex, look at the description for the COMMON RECALL QUEUE.
This will allow HSM on another LPAR to perform the recall.
HTH,
snip
I have 5 LPARS currently running DFHSM. I have just
Hello,
Our MVS Guest's crash abruptly, the only message about it's
reason is in zVM's Operator's Log, because these MVS are running under.
Can anybody help me, how to see Operator log under zVM, so that
I can check the reason for MVS crashes.
Sorry, if I am
Have you looked at common recall queues? The request gets queued but
serviced on one of the other LPARS.
ddk
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 08/03/2011 12:34 PM
Subject:NOT Running DFHSM on an LPAR
Sent by:IBM Mainframe
Is this in a parallel sysplex?. If no, then the answer is *NO*. The request
will be queued.
If a parallel sysplex, look at the description for the COMMON RECALL QUEUE.
This will allow HSM on another LPAR to perform the recall.
Thanks.
This is a parallel Sysplex. We are looking at CRQ but
Goes to Operator cms machine, and give
cp sp cons clo
Thsi should close console log from IPL until now and generate a Printer
file. You can trans fer this printer file from Operator to your cms
machine and using RDRList watch it to check what happens.
Carlos Bodra
IBM Certified
You do need to run HSM to take advantage of CRQ, but you can leave all the
housekeeping work (overhead) to other LPARs. Without HSM running in this
LPAR, you would have to (manually) issue recall commands on another LPAR.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric
Issue ' LIST DATASETNAME MIGRATIONCONTROLDATASET SELECT(VOLUME(xx) SDSP)'
to see if HSM thinks there is any SDSP data left.
If the volume is defined w/NOSDSP, and the SDSP dataset is empty (see above)
the SDSP dataset can be deleted. Use IDCAMS DELETE VVR, since the cluster is
not
Thanks for reply. I used cp sp cons clo command to lose console log.
Now can you help me to transfer this printer file from operator to CMS
machine and how do I use RDRList to watch.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Saurabh
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal cbo...@terra.com.br
Add the following to /etc/rc and /etc/profile
TZ=desired value
export $TZ
HTH,
snip
# date showed:
# date
Wed Aug 3 18:42:03 UTC 2011
#
# echo $TZ showed:
UTC0
#
and this is what's in /SYSTEM/etc/rc:
.snippage
/snip
trans operator prt xxx to yourmachine r
xxx = spool file id
Give this command on operator machine
Carlos Bodra
IBM Certified Specialist System z
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Em 03/08/2011 14:47, saurabh khandelwal escreveu:
Thanks for reply. I used cp sp cons clo command to lose console
I used below command and got the error that Spool id not found.
Ready; T=0.01/0.02 19:17:48
*cp sp cons clo*
19:23:39 RDR FILE 0002 SENT FROM OPERATOR CON WAS 0002 RECS 0005 CPY 001 T
NOHO
LD NOKEEP
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 19:23:39
*trans operator prt 0002 to maint r*
19:24:31 NO FILES
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 08/03/2011
12:46:10 PM:
Sometime ago I had a S/A dump that was created after a wait state
occurred
during an IPL. I was able to view the dump on IPCS.
Now, after a few weeks have passed and having re-create the S/A dump
after
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I have 5 LPARS currently running DFHSM. I have just added a Sixth LPAR where
we do not want to run DFHSM due to constraints we are placing on this LPAR.
I ran a test on what would happen with DFHSM not running on a RECALL.
When I issued the command, it placed the
Hello Carlos,
Thanks for replying.I used below command and got the error
that Spool id not found.
Ready; T=0.01/0.02 19:17:48
*cp sp cons clo*
19:23:39 RDR FILE 0002 SENT FROM OPERATOR CON WAS 0002 RECS 0005 CPY 001 T
NOHO
LD NOKEEP
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 19:23:39
*trans
I check rl ( reader list) by logging at Operator id . And it gives me zVM
log sorting by date.
but it doesnt give me particular MVS SYStem log, which is crashing . Can
anybody help me to get that MVs log in this.
Regards
Saurabh
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:43 PM, saurabh khandelwal
Hello, all. Can someone please point me to some documentation on
Extended addressability vsam file restrictions. Or if would anyone know
what restrictions we might run into, such as it has to be less than 12
gig etc...
TIA
Mike
==
This email and any files transmitted
Mike,
The following is extracted from 'DFSMS Using Data sets':
Using extended addressability, the size limit for a VSAM data set is
determined by either:
t Control interval
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:12:54 -0400, George Rodriguez
george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org wrote:
Did you see my last
post to MVS-L? I had posted that I did solve my problem.
Thanks.
Yes, I did. Your post came out as I was typing mine. Glad you got your problem
fixed. XMITIP is one of my
Yes, you're right.
Fortunately, John got it inmediately.
Regards,
Sandro Ambrozic
+34 666 803 223
2011/8/3 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
In
caeajr1jeew6zsw7u_dgukgt6z1d--dtthl7wjcfszhyo+kk...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/02/2011
at 04:06 PM, Sandro Ambrozic
Looking at what you had at that point should be a strong clue. (and
then manually delete the dataset).
After I found out he did his research, I gave a few hints.
Here's the biggest one though:
Look at the input size!
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
... I translate my thoughts into words and for this I use whatever suitable
word - not necessarily the most appropriate one - first comes to mind.
Humpty Dumpty to Alice:
A word means exactly what I intend it to mean!
In a field that requires precision and accuracy, communication in that field
I'm not sure whether you want to (a) avoid recalls or (b) avoid the CPU
time required to run DFSMShsm at all.
If (a), would an ARCRPEXT exit that passed back return code 8 for every
recall request, indicating that DFSMShsm should purge them rather than
queuing them, do what you want?
ARCRPEXT
Thanks. I'll pull it up and read that section.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Vsam Extened Adressability
Mike,
Have you any console log for MVS machine in spool?
And if you put MVS up again and check MVS log, any messages?
Carlos Bodra
IBM Certified Specialist System z
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Em 03/08/2011 15:32, saurabh khandelwal escreveu:
I check rl ( reader list) by logging at Operator id .
I am all monoplex and I don't run DFHSM in one. I get Tape not supported with
an ISBF browse of a migrated dataset. And yes an HRECALL seems to be queued
somewhere. (I'd like to know where and how to cancel, but I won't lose sleep:)
A batch job failed with an JCL error (SMS allocation failure)
Hello,
I am not sure on this, as I am new to this env.
But I am interest in z/VM console log. I think in this log, it will tell us
about the MVS guest crashes
Can you help me to find in my system, how it has been defined and how do I
check this.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Carlos Bodra -
Any clue.?
Regards
Saurabh Khandelwal
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:21 AM, saurabh khandelwal
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure on this, as I am new to this env.
But I am interest in z/VM console log. I think in this log, it will tell us
about the MVS guest crashes
Is there something I should be changing in USS?
*
*
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*Application Support / Quality Assurance*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
*3348 Forest Hill Blvd.*
*Room B-332*
*West Palm
snip-
To almost take pride in not having the time to consult appropriate
references, and yet at the same time be adamant that you are right
and others wrong when they have,
Some of us[1] have read not only the manuals
Is there an IPCS command to show IARV64 GETSHARED areas that do not have
SHAREMEMOBJ users?
ipcs rsmdata hvshrdata highvirtual does not seem to do the job.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use
PDSFAST from SEA may work for Fast Copy. Depending on size and activity,
converting to PDSE may also work (at least for compression, and possibly
caching).
Ezyedit can be replaced by IBM's Productivity Facility (?), formerly Spiffy.
Scan and Replace can be found in data manipulation tools such
On 8/3/2011 1:25 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
Yep, Shmuel we have a couple customers asking for a 'generic' wilbur or roscoe
type interface.
It amazes me that people are still using Wilbur or Roscoe..
Why should it? For some users, and some applications, using a
dumb terminal, with user
After issuing VERBX SADMPMS, I see the message: THE,DUMP BEING PROCESSED
IS NOT A STAND-ALONE DUMP,
Yet, I know that a S/A dump was taken. It wrote out to my output SADMP
dataset and i see in that dataset the following:
in the first record of SADMP: AMDSADMPH.ö_.Õ2æ.q..Z/OS WAIT STATE
John Norgauer wrote:
After issuing VERBX SADMPMS, I see the message: THE,DUMP BEING PROCESSED
IS NOT A STAND-ALONE DUMP,
Yet, I know that a S/A dump was taken. It wrote out to my output SADMP
dataset and i see in that dataset the following:
in the first record of SADMP:
The subject is a bit more complicated. Here's my answer and I'm sorry it has
to be this long. Please see the original post at the end of my answer.
There are three types of caps which can constrain an LPAR:
1) Hard Cap where the CP weights and INITIAL CAPPING is set on
2) Soft Cap where DEFINED
I have been knocking around in ISMF, defining Storage Class, Group and
ACS routines.
How I wish I can get a cookbook approach.
Thank you for single out this Guide.
Regards Lim ML
On 04/08/11 1:32 AM, Neubert, Kevin wrote:
Take a look at Chapter 7 (Defining Data Classes) in DFSMSdfp Storage
Brian Westerman at IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 08/02/2011 11:20:13 PM:
We have recently migrated two sites from CA-Sort to DF/Sort. The
only real issues you can run up against are when the site decides to
use the sort exits because they are not compatible.
I
On 26 Jul 2011 07:44:38 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
McKown, John wrote:
But I've been doing some work where I really need in depth information about
VSAM clusters. So I've been doing a LISTCAT ENT(...) ALL and parsing the
output. Which is bad because the output could possibly
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
