Re: DFHSM: Backup tape lost due to errors

2012-01-21 Thread retired mainframer
If the entire volume is unreadable, it would seem you need to use DELVOL to tell SMS that everything that was supposed to be on that volume is lost. If some of the files on the tape are usable, then FREEVOL may be a better choice or possibly RECYCLE (either combined with the appropriate BDELETEs

Re: PDSE

2012-01-21 Thread retired mainframer
::-Original Message- ::From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On ::Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing ::Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:02 AM ::To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu ::Subject: Re: PDSE :: ::So the only functionally-equivalent, officially-sanctioned way to

Re: DFHSM: Backup tape lost due to errors

2012-01-23 Thread retired mainframer
::-Original Message- ::From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On ::Behalf Of R.S. ::Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:46 AM ::To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu ::Subject: Re: DFHSM: Backup tape lost due to errors :: ::W dniu 2012-01-22 05:21, Joel C. Ewing pisze: :: I've

Re: Annoying ISPF prob

2012-01-28 Thread retired mainframer
bit.listserv.ispf-l is the Usenet echo of the ISPF listserv. You don't subscribe to it; you just read using your newsreader of choice and a Usenet server that carries it. To subscribe to the actual list and receive messages automatically, send an email (from the account to which you want the

Re: CPP (C++) file on z/OS

2012-01-30 Thread retired mainframer
What system is it currently on? Which system is your client and which your server? What ftp options are you using? What command? :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Donald Likens :: Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012

Re: How to reformat JFCB creation date in SMF to 'yyyy/mm/dd' format by DFSORT

2012-02-05 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Minoru Massaki :: Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:47 AM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: How to reformat JFCB creation date in SMF to '/mm/dd' :: format by DFSORT :: ::

Re: DFRMM change Storage Group field on Dataset record

2012-02-06 Thread retired mainframer
You don't. Storage groups are assigned by the ACS routines if the dataset is assigned a storage class. Does it have meaning if the dataset is not disk resident? :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of af dc :: Sent:

Re: System Dumps and SMS allocation fails

2012-02-10 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Ken Leidner :: Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 8:06 AM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: System Dumps and SMS allocation fails :: :: First this is a long entry, but I wanted to

Re: Authorized functions

2012-02-15 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Scott Ford :: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:16 AM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: Authorized functions :: :: Walt, :: :: First , thanks for responding.. :: :: Let

Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?

2012-02-15 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN :: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:34 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation? :: :: Still no luck: :: :: FCO105I

Re: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?

2012-02-18 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) :: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 3:51 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation? :: :: In ::

Re: Subject: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?

2012-02-18 Thread retired mainframer
The REUSE operand will cause ALLOC to free the DD name currently if it is currently in use. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Mike Schwab :: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 4:59 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu ::

Re: Subject: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?

2012-02-18 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin :: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 7:56 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: Subject: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation? :: :: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:38:28

Re: VVDS with no catalog pointers

2012-02-24 Thread retired mainframer
If the VVDS was created automatically by SMS when the first dataset was created on the volume, then it was catalogued in the same catalog as that dataset. Usually, the dataset is a user dataset and the VVDS ends up being catalogued in the corresponding user catalog. However, LISTCAT (which

Re: VVDS with no catalog pointers

2012-02-24 Thread retired mainframer
An SMS volume with any SMS managed dataset will also have a VVDS. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Mike Schwab :: Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 4:57 AM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: VVDS with no

Re: MIGRATING A ML0 VOLUME - CLARIFICATION

2012-03-13 Thread retired mainframer
Is the volume SMS managed or not? My copy of the HSM Storage Administration manual states that if the MIGRATE sub-parameter of the VOLUME parameter is not specified for an SMS volume, the command will fail with an error message. It also states that the DAYS parameter can only be specified for an

Re: MIGRATING A ML0 VOLUME - CLARIFICATION

2012-03-13 Thread retired mainframer
The description of the FREEVOL command does not show a DAYS parameter. It also clearly states that the destination volume (ML1 or ML2) is determined by the LEVEL-1-DAYS-NONUSAGE of the management class controlling the dataset if the dataset is SMS managed. For non-SMS managed datasets, you need

Re: ISPF abendS138 reas2470003

2012-03-15 Thread retired mainframer
What was the user doing when this error occurred? If the dialogue was provided by IBM or a vendor, that would be the best source for resolution. If it was home grown, the ball is in your court. The Abend panels section in Appendix C of the ISPF Dialogue Developer Guide and Reference has some

Re: SMPe Receive Error

2012-03-20 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of jagadishan perumal :: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:48 AM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: SMPe Receive Error :: :: Lizette, :: :: I have modified the SMPTLIB statement

Re: UNABLE TO DELETE DUPLICTE DSN

2012-03-22 Thread retired mainframer
Temporarily rename the catalogued dataset (must not be in use currently). Issue a DEFINE NVSAM command and specify the RECATALOG parameter. Delete the newly catalogued dataset. Rename the original dataset back to proper name. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Malicious Software Protection

2012-03-27 Thread retired mainframer
Since you have one of the security products installed and heavily configured, why not identify that as your protection tool. Maybe even demonstrate that controls prevent unauthorized updates to system and APF datasets and the IPL text. Given z/OS's statement of integrity, if the malicious

Re: Cataloged dataset

2012-03-29 Thread retired mainframer
Would a DELETE NOSCR followed by a DEFINE NVSAM do what you want? But the real question is how did a catalog entry for the volume in question get created n the first place? Did a segment of the data set exist on the volume at one time and then get deleted without the catalog being updated

Re: Initialize Tape Options

2012-04-01 Thread retired mainframer
When you say initialize do you mean any of the following? Write a tape mark at the beginning so the tape is non-labeled. Create the VOL1 record so the tape is SL. Update the VOL1 record so the SL tape has a different volser. Erase the tape so that all previous data is no longer

Re: RACF Help

2012-04-02 Thread retired mainframer
The source is at http://zjournal.tcipubs.com/issues/DouglasUtilities.html Google is your friend. Search for CNV2UGRP and read the articles which describe how to use it. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Mark Steely

Re: RACF Help

2012-04-02 Thread retired mainframer
Beware the extra space in the url Greg posted. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Mark Steely :: Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:42 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: RACF Help :: :: I found that also.. The

Re: Initialize Tape Options

2012-04-02 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Jake anderson :: Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 7:35 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: Initialize Tape Options :: :: Hey Mike/Russell/All, :: :: Thanks for giving an

Re: Initialize Tape error

2012-04-03 Thread retired mainframer
There is something more going on with your ACS routines. The FILTLIST you provided did not exclude IBMUSER datasets (but then that source had leading asterisks so it could have been all comments). The STORCLAS routines I used always checked the unit against a DASD FILTLIST (3390, SYSDA, etc) and

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - PREVENTING SPACE MANAGEMENT FROM EXECUTING

2012-04-03 Thread retired mainframer
That's what my manual says. The first means do not start. The second is ignored. This merely implements the solution you have decided upon. The real question is what issue are you trying to solve and is this the best way to solve it. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM

Re: Coding IEASYMxx

2012-04-07 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Jake anderson :: Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 6:58 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Coding IEASYMxx :: :: Hello All, :: :: First of all apology for asking a very basic

Re: Coding IEASYMxx

2012-04-08 Thread retired mainframer
in any of the parmlib and update the same in LOADxx member ? Please advise me your expert comment. Jake On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, retired mainframer retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote: :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Re: Coding IEASYMxx

2012-04-09 Thread retired mainframer
We need to get the terminology straight first. What do you mean by source SYSRES and target SYSRES? Is source the IPL volumes and target the volume holding the SMPE target datasets? Or are you using ServerPac terminology? BTW, are any of these volumes SMS managed? :: -Original

Re: Reversing the Catalog Definition entries

2012-04-17 Thread retired mainframer
If you bring the datasets up in ISPF 3.4, just type a U in front of the DSN(s) and when that completes, type a C :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Jake anderson :: Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:48 PM :: To:

Re: SMS QUESTION

2012-04-20 Thread retired mainframer
Can you produce the output of LISTCAT ENT('SYS2.MCDS') ALL from both systems and see what the differences are? :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of willie bunter :: Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 9:37 AM :: To:

Re: DSN MYSTERY - CURRENT UTILIZATION GREATER THAN CURRENT ALLOCATION.

2012-04-26 Thread retired mainframer
You left out some key information from the first two lines of the IEHLIST output. Your previous (and subsequent) ISPF data states that 12 extents are allocated. This IEHLIST output shows only 3 with tracks. It then shows 9 additional extents with no tracks. That explains the 12 extents

Re: Have you ever done this using FTP?

2012-04-26 Thread retired mainframer
If you specify EBCDIC and BLOCK and if the receiving PDS is already allocated, it will even transfer load modules and preserve the directory information. I think it will also preserve ISPF statistics. lcd local_pds cd remote_pds ebcdic block mget * (or mput if you are on the transmit system)

Re: XML Parsing

2012-04-30 Thread retired mainframer
Edit the data in ISPF and issue the following commands: C 'SSN' 'TIN' ALL C '/SSN' '/TIN' ALL :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Ron Thomas :: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:13 AM :: To:

Re: Catalog Question

2012-04-30 Thread retired mainframer
Since that APAR is from 2002, the OP should also check the SMS Managing Catalogs document for his 1.9 system just in case anything has changed. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Staller, Allan :: Sent: Monday, April

Re: DFSMShsm Deleted Datasets

2012-05-07 Thread retired mainframer
Were the datasets SMS managed? If so, what were the management class attributes? If not, what aging options are specified in ARCCMDxx? Have either changed recently? :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of George

Re: FTP Parameters in Batch

2012-05-08 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Walter Marguccio :: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:33 AM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: FTP Parameters in Batch :: :: I am looking for the FTP parameters to overwrite the

Re: National Vulnerability Database (NVD) Search for Mainframe Vulnerabilities

2012-05-08 Thread retired mainframer
What does CA have to do with the NVD? :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of Cris Hernandez #9 :: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 1:29 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :: Subject: Re: National Vulnerability Database (NVD)

Re: SMS Dataset Alloc Issue

2012-05-25 Thread retired mainframer
You misinterpreted. If the dataset is not catalogued in the normal search order, you have to tell DSLIST to search all the catalogs. The way to do this is to specify a wild card as the HLQ, include any additional qualifiers to limit the output, and NOT specify a volume. In the example you

Re: SMS Dataset Alloc Issue

2012-05-26 Thread retired mainframer
You do not delete the data component. You delete the cluster. You do so using Access Methods Services (aka IDCAMS) by specifying both the fully qualified DSN and the catalog where that DSN can be found. If you have problems show us the job and the IDCAMS output. :: -Original Message-

Re: DFSMS SG POOL Enablement

2012-05-28 Thread retired mainframer
The VARY command updates the active configuration in the SMS address space, not the SCDS dataset. By issuing the SETSMS after the VARY, you restored everything back the way it was, in effect undoing the vary. Either 1 - update an SCDS and then activate it or 2 - update the active

Re: DFSMS SG POOL Enablement

2012-05-29 Thread retired mainframer
, isn't the same as SETSMS SCDS :: cmd??? :: Thx, A.Cecilio :: :: :: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:39 PM, retired mainframer :: retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote: :: :: The VARY command updates the active configuration in the SMS address :: space, :: not the SCDS dataset. By issuing the SETSMS after

Re: JCL PROBLEM - REVISITED

2012-06-10 Thread retired mainframer
After the PROC001 statement, code //TAPE DD VOL=(,RETAIN,,35) to override just the volume operand on that DD statement. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On :: Behalf Of John Dawes :: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:50 PM :: To:

Re: installing serverpac for 1.13 using 1.11 system

2012-06-12 Thread retired mainframer
On my last 1.11 system, the mount point was /SERVICE. We also had the alternate root system normally mounted there (for any SMPE work). You may need to confirm the mount point is free before issuing the mount command. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List