The RACF checks that are part of IBM Health Checker for z/OS might provide
more information than its DSMON report. In particular, but not necessarily
limited to, look at the RACF_SENSITIVE_RESOURCES check.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I had a problem once with an APF library not being RACF protected. I set up
a library for something, I can't even remember what, and put it in the APF
list. Unfortuneatly, it was the only APF library that had RACF protection
allowing update by anyone. We had an audit about 2 years or so
Eric Bielefeld pisze:
I had a problem once with an APF library not being RACF protected. I
set up a library for something, I can't even remember what, and put it
in the APF list. Unfortuneatly, it was the only APF library that had
RACF protection allowing update by anyone. We had an audit
On Fri, 8 May 2009 16:26:02 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Eric Bielefeld pisze:
I had a problem once with an APF library not being RACF protected. I
set up a library for something, I can't even remember what, and put it
in the APF list. Unfortuneatly, it was the only APF
Eric Bielefeld pisze:
I had a problem once with an APF library not being RACF protected. I
set up a library for something, I can't even remember what, and put it
in the APF list. Unfortuneatly, it was the only APF library that had
RACF protection allowing update by anyone. We had an audit
I couldn't remember what DSMON was, so I looked it up on ASK.COM. I keep
seeing ads for ASK.COM whenever I watch Nascar races, as one of the cars has
ASK.COM as a sponser. The first hit had a good explanation, and now I
remember just what it was.
I don't know if DSMON(ICHDSM00) was
Mark Zelden pisze:
On Fri, 8 May 2009 16:26:02 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Eric Bielefeld pisze:
I had a problem once with an APF library not being RACF protected. I
set up a library for something, I can't even remember what, and put it
in the APF list. Unfortuneatly,
7 matches
Mail list logo
