In p06240804cabcf190fc74@[192.168.1.11], on 10/13/2011
at 03:59 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com said:
The UNIX KILL command is the equivalent of STOP, CANCEL, and FORCE
depending on what parms you use. The normal (default) version is the
same as STOP.
In the sense that an airplane
Hello all,
have just back-ported a c++ program (do not ask why).. to a z/OS 1.5 system.
The program seems to start correctly, however my colleague informs me that
he cannot stop the program - he issues an internal command to halt the program.
In the /tmp/ message log I am seeing the
/wiki/Perror)?
Regards,
Erik Janssen.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Namens Andre
Massena
Verzonden: donderdag 13 oktober 2011 13:09
Aan: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Onderwerp: C++ program and possible authority issues.
Hello all
Hi
The EPERM(139) error number can occur during the call of several kernel
functions.
I think you need to know in which function you got this EPERM(139) error.
Maybe the simplest way to modify the code, end extend this rc= -1
errno1 139 with some trace-back, dump .
RACF setting, USS
and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Andre Massena
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: C++ program and possible authority issues.
Hello all
From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
In errno.h, an error code of 139 is EPERM. But without knowing what
function got the error
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
In errno.h, an error code of 139 is EPERM. But without
knowing what function
got the error, that is not of much use. With RACF, you'd see
some ICH408I
message in the z/OS SYSLOG. I don't know about ACF2.
--
John McKown
Systems
ssnbsp;
---Please excuse my brevity. I'm trying to win The Email Game!-Original
Message-
Re: C program and possible authority issues.
From: Scott Ford lt;scott_j_f...@yahoo.comgt;To: ibm-m...@bama.ua.eduDate:
Thursday, October 13, 2011 at 6:07PM
John:nbsp;In ACF2 he should
AM
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
In errno.h, an error code of 139 is EPERM. But without
knowing what function
got the error, that is not of much use. With RACF, you'd see
some ICH408I
message in the z/OS SYSLOG. I don't know about ACF2.
--
John McKown
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
All,
I have subsequently learned from my colleague that the operation being
attempted was a
'kill' (sigterm).
Regards,
Andre
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Andre Massena
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues
, 2011 10:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
All,
I have subsequently learned from my colleague that the
operation being
attempted was a
'kill' (sigterm).
Regards,
Andre
Of Andre Massena
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
John,
thank you. Now I have to translate that into ACF2...
Regards,
Andre
En réponse à McKown, John john.mck
Andre Massena wrote:
the STC does not react to stop 'P', but does to cancel 'C'.
IMHO, it is bad, very bad, but please, see below, please. (Please don't throw
molotov cocktails to me... :D )
The reason they want to use the relatively elegant SIGTERM is that there is a
lot of automation /
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ program and possible authority issues.
Andre Massena wrote:
the STC does not react to stop 'P', but does to cancel 'C'.
IMHO, it is bad, very bad, but please, see below, please.
(Please don't throw molotov cocktails to me... :D )
The reason
At 13:01 -0500 on 10/13/2011, McKown, John wrote about Re: C++
program and possible authority issues.:
I agree, even though I'm the nitwit who mentioned CANCEL. The OP
said the user wants kill as the way to shutdown the application
due to some existing automation (they must be very UNIX
16 matches
Mail list logo