Hi
On 2/7/2012 7:28 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Hi Avram,
The program does not operate in any way under IMS. The only reason I
mentioned IMS was that is is an alternative to LE...
If you can tell, in which environment this program works ?
How and who starts 10 times /second ?
ITschak
On
Only yesterday I solved a similar problem with calling a cobol module from
rexx. The cobol routine was called some 100,000 times with a 5 to 10 cs
overhead (elapsed). That really hurt.
In my case the cobol was only a veneer to some existing extensive assembler
code. So I rewrote the veneer in
Is this program an IMS application (did you do a PSBGEN for it) or a subroutine.
Is the program serialy reusabele?
At any rate the solution to your problem my be in IMS and not LE.
I expect the program is an IMS application because if it were a subroutine the
LE environment would be built by
Hi Avram,
The program does not operate in any way under IMS. The only reason I
mentioned IMS was that is is an alternative to LE...
ITschak
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Avram Friedman ibmsysp...@geek-sites.comwrote:
Is this program an IMS application (did you do a PSBGEN for it) or a
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:04:55 +0200, Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution environment which is a huge overhead for a small and short
running
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution environment which is a huge overhead for a small and short
running program. I want to eliminate LE to get involved. I thought that
static bind will
On 2/3/2012 12:04 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution environment which is a huge overhead for a small and short
running program. I want to eliminate LE to
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de
Itschak Mugzach
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2012 09:05
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: C program and LE/IMS option
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re
-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2012 09:05
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: C program and LE/IMS option
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution environment which is a huge overhead
program and LE/IMS option
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution environment which is a huge overhead for a small and short
running program. I want to eliminate LE to get involved. I
available
with C code, not C++.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, February 3, 2012 8:01:36 AM
Subject: Re: C program and LE/IMS option
Hello Ituriel,
Yes, I looked @ METAL option but I do not know the difference between
Itschak Mugzach
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2012 09:05
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: C program and LE/IMS option
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution
++.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, February 3, 2012 8:01:36 AM
Subject: Re: C program and LE/IMS option
Hello Ituriel,
Yes, I looked @ METAL option but I do not know the difference between METAL
and GENASM, any
and The MEGA
Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C program and LE/IMS option
Hi
: C program and LE/IMS option
Hello Ituriel,
Yes, I looked @ METAL option but I do not know the difference between METAL
and GENASM, any idea?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:40 PM, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
4254.itur...@bradesco.com.br wrote:
I think you can use Metal C.
Atenciosamente / Regards
Hi
Anyhow are you sure the LE environment creation is the overhead ?
I mean maybe the program load/delete can be also a problem .
With the LE RUNTIME options , STACK HEAP allocation also you can
increase the performance, but it would be not bad to see
there is the problem, before do
-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de
Itschak Mugzach
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2012 09:05
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: C program and LE/IMS option
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs
-system exits.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, February 3, 2012 8:58:35 AM
Subject: Re: C program and LE/IMS option
Hi Lloyd,
So what is better? GENASM or METAL from eliminating LE prospective? It is
my understanding
In
caodpegr4uk4zsnow_mtdiod-jz-jvgswrd2kpb7oneuturd...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/03/2012
at 01:04 PM, Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com said:
What should i do
Modify the calling program to initialize LE. It's a nuisance if you
don't need LE services, but IMHO it's the cleanest solution.
--
On 3 February 2012 08:11, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com wrote:
Eliminating LE usage from a [non-Metal] C function would be a
formidable undertaking. You can, however, set up the LE before the
first CALL to your C function and keep it up between these CALLs in
such a way that you
I am delighted to learn that SPC is alive and apparently not even moribund.
The LE tends to be deprecated here, particularly by those who have not
used it enough to master it; but in my own view its storage-management
and condition-handling facilties are redemptive; and what I have
learned here
I am delighted to learn that SPC is alive and apparently not even moribund.
I believe SPC has been stabilized, officially or unofficially, for a long time.
Metal C seems to be the intended replacement.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
Thanks to all replied. There is another reason that I want to eliminated
LE, and this is that under certen environments it creaes an Encave which is
useless for the spec we have. So eminating LE is much more important then
just saving te mips of creating the environment. I am aware of CEEPIPI and
23 matches
Mail list logo
