ICHRSMFI - ancient usermod, is it needed?

2011-07-15 Thread Barbara Nitz
Currently I have the dubious honour of helping to install z/OS 1.12. We have reached the part where all of our usermods need to get customized. While doing that, I came across this modification to the RACF Report Writer: ++ZAP(ICHRSMFI) DISTLIB(AOSBN). NAME RACFRW ICHRSMFI

Re: ICHRSMFI - ancient usermod, is it needed?

2011-07-15 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
On 7/15/2011 8:52 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote: Currently I have the dubious honour of helping to install z/OS 1.12. We have reached the part where all of our usermods need to get customized. While doing that, I came across this modification to the RACF Report Writer: ++ZAP(ICHRSMFI)

Re: ICHRSMFI - ancient usermod, is it needed?

2011-07-15 Thread Norbert Friemel
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:52:20 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote: If we keep the type20 (instead of using the type30), would this have any impact on our type30 accounting? No. The zap changes the smf record type used by the (deprecated) RACF report writer. Some informations/reports are missing in

Re: ICHRSMFI - ancient usermod, is it needed?

2011-07-15 Thread Barbara Nitz
The zap changes the smf record type used by the (deprecated) RACF report writer. Some informations/reports are missing in reports generated by the RACF report writer if the usermod is not applied AND smf type20 is NOT collected (see SMFPRMxx TYPE/NOTYPE parameter) You mean this is another area