concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
David,
The second step seems to be a proc over ride statement. What does the
SYSUT2 DD statement look like in the COPY Proc?
I would think that if there were an issue with CA1 then you would have more
than one tape dataset getting expired
You are welcome.
Sometimes we forget the simplest things and that is what we are here for.
To help us remember the stuff we forget. :-D
Lizette
Lizette,
A belated Thank You is in order for suggesting TMSAUDIT and then gently
reminding me when I didn't run it when you first suggested.
: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
Hi Dave,
I'm sure that you noticed but the CRTDT changed with RGWOPMSC @ 2009142
20.18.36.15. It went from
CRTDT=09135 EXPDT=99000 at 20.18.01.43 to CRTDT=09142 EXPDT
David,
The second step seems to be a proc over ride statement. What does the
SYSUT2 DD statement look like in the COPY Proc?
I would think that if there were an issue with CA1 then you would have more
than one tape dataset getting expired and scratched like this. It is more
likely that the
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette
Koehler [stars...@mindspring.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 8:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
David,
The second step seems to be a proc
List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
Hi John,
Yes, I did notice that.
Checking the jcl the first reference to the dataset in question is
//M4OLD DD DSN=HLQ.PUBLIC.MASTER,DISP=(OLD,PASS,CATLG
List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John
Kelly [john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
Hey Dave,
Yeah, since I would assume that SYSUT2 is output, it should
User complained the other day that we had destroyed one of their tapes.
I ran a DAF report and sure enough TMS had scratched the tape and uncataloged
the file.
When the tape was originally created it was under catalog control so that TMS
should not have trashed it.
But as I look at the DAFRPT
-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape
file.
User complained the other day that we had destroyed one of their
tapes.
I ran a DAF report and sure enough TMS had scratched the tape and
uncataloged the file.
When the tape was originally created it was under catalog control so
that TMS should not have
...@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 3:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
Does this job RGWOPMSC have EXPDT coded in the JCL? Is there something in the
CA1 exit to change EXPDT in certain conditions?
Do you use
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
Hi Lizzette,
Thanks for chiming in.
Yes, RGWOPMSC has Expdt=99000
No, CA1 exits are in use.
MG3480 YES
SCRTCH NO
SCRCAT YES
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe
: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
Does this job RGWOPMSC have EXPDT coded in the JCL? Is there something in the
CA1 exit to change EXPDT in certain conditions?
Do you use the following exits: CL05228 CL05232 CL05245
How is TMOOPT00 coded?
MG3480 YES
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
I forgot one more field. The OCTLG. What is that set to.
And that job that uses DISP=OLD has EXPDT=99000 coded? Amazing.
Lizette
Lizzette,
Sorry, I mis-typed. There are no CA1 exits in use.
Hi Lizzette
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
Sent: Jun 2, 2009 3:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.
OCTLG YES
DISP=(OLD,PASS,CATLG), with EXPDT=99000
Dave O'Brien
NIH
Hi Dave,
I'm sure that you noticed but the CRTDT changed with RGWOPMSC @ 2009142
20.18.36.15. It went from
CRTDT=09135 EXPDT=99000 at 20.18.01.43 to CRTDT=09142 EXPDT=0 at
20.18.36.15. And it looks like the same job? I don't know how to read DAF
but could a step in the job (SYSUT2) opened
15 matches
Mail list logo