Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-06 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. David, The second step seems to be a proc over ride statement. What does the SYSUT2 DD statement look like in the COPY Proc? I would think that if there were an issue with CA1 then you would have more than one tape dataset getting expired

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
You are welcome. Sometimes we forget the simplest things and that is what we are here for. To help us remember the stuff we forget. :-D Lizette Lizette, A belated Thank You is in order for suggesting TMSAUDIT and then gently reminding me when I didn't run it when you first suggested.

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-03 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. Hi Dave, I'm sure that you noticed but the CRTDT changed with RGWOPMSC @ 2009142 20.18.36.15. It went from CRTDT=09135 EXPDT=99000 at 20.18.01.43 to CRTDT=09142 EXPDT

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-03 Thread Lizette Koehler
David, The second step seems to be a proc over ride statement. What does the SYSUT2 DD statement look like in the COPY Proc? I would think that if there were an issue with CA1 then you would have more than one tape dataset getting expired and scratched like this. It is more likely that the

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-03 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler [stars...@mindspring.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 8:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. David, The second step seems to be a proc

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-03 Thread John Kelly
List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. Hi John, Yes, I did notice that. Checking the jcl the first reference to the dataset in question is //M4OLD DD DSN=HLQ.PUBLIC.MASTER,DISP=(OLD,PASS,CATLG

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-03 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John Kelly [john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. Hey Dave, Yeah, since I would assume that SYSUT2 is output, it should

Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
User complained the other day that we had destroyed one of their tapes. I ran a DAF report and sure enough TMS had scratched the tape and uncataloged the file. When the tape was originally created it was under catalog control so that TMS should not have trashed it. But as I look at the DAFRPT

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. User complained the other day that we had destroyed one of their tapes. I ran a DAF report and sure enough TMS had scratched the tape and uncataloged the file. When the tape was originally created it was under catalog control so that TMS should not have

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
...@mindspring.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 3:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. Does this job RGWOPMSC have EXPDT coded in the JCL? Is there something in the CA1 exit to change EXPDT in certain conditions? Do you use

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. Hi Lizzette, Thanks for chiming in. Yes, RGWOPMSC has Expdt=99000 No, CA1 exits are in use. MG3480 YES SCRTCH NO SCRCAT YES Dave O'Brien NIH Contractor From: IBM Mainframe

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. Does this job RGWOPMSC have EXPDT coded in the JCL? Is there something in the CA1 exit to change EXPDT in certain conditions? Do you use the following exits: CL05228 CL05232 CL05245 How is TMOOPT00 coded? MG3480 YES

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. I forgot one more field. The OCTLG. What is that set to. And that job that uses DISP=OLD has EXPDT=99000 coded? Amazing. Lizette Lizzette, Sorry, I mis-typed. There are no CA1 exits in use. Hi Lizzette

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
Lizette -Original Message- From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov Sent: Jun 2, 2009 3:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file. OCTLG YES DISP=(OLD,PASS,CATLG), with EXPDT=99000 Dave O'Brien NIH

Re: Question concerning pre-mature uncatalog/delete of a tape file.

2009-06-02 Thread John Kelly
Hi Dave, I'm sure that you noticed but the CRTDT changed with RGWOPMSC @ 2009142 20.18.36.15. It went from CRTDT=09135 EXPDT=99000 at 20.18.01.43 to CRTDT=09142 EXPDT=0 at 20.18.36.15. And it looks like the same job? I don't know how to read DAF but could a step in the job (SYSUT2) opened