In that case , AMBLIST or browse the load modules.
snip
I don't have PDS unfortunately.
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO
in the
map.
HTH and good luck
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
Thanks. No change.
//STEPLIB DD DSN
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
Tea leaves are good for making tea. :) I would compile SignalHandler.C with
the LIST option to see the psuedo assembly output and see from the dump
where the abend occured and try to figure out what went wrong. The message
you've given wouldn't
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
Ok - we are assuming that this is an LE problem. Let's not do that. If we
assume we are looking
and no I'm all done message.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Don Poitras
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
Tea leaves are good for making tea. :) I
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com wrote:
Tea leaves are good for making tea. :) I would compile
this
and hoping that this will get you past it.
Sam
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
On Tue, Jan 31
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
the dump title and dump options must respectively be 80 and 255 byte
fixed
length character strings
That's why I am using the IBM leawi.h macros to define them. _CHAR80,
for example
I am getting a S0C4 (apparently - assuming I am reading the tea leaves
correctly) calling CEE3DMP from a C linkage signal handler routine in a C++
program under v1.13. I believe the code used to work under V1.10 but I am
not absolutely certain that nothing has been changed.
I am using leawi.h for
Are CEE.SCEERUN/CEE.SCEERUN2 available via steplib or LNKLSTxx?
Mixed versions of the above?
snip
I am getting a S0C4 (apparently - assuming I am reading the tea leaves
correctly) calling CEE3DMP from a C linkage signal handler routine in a
C++
program under v1.13. I believe the code used to
: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
Are CEE.SCEERUN/CEE.SCEERUN2 available via steplib or LNKLSTxx?
Mixed versions of the above?
snip
I am getting a S0C4 (apparently - assuming I am reading the tea leaves
correctly) calling CEE3DMP from a C linkage
@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
Good call! Mixed versions of COBOL and LE runtimes are good places to start.
Eliminating them isn't as easy as you might think if the environment is
'dirty
I would add the datasets CEE.SCEERUN and CEE.SCEERUN2 via steplib and
see if your S0C4 goes away
snip
I am not using a STEPLIB or JOBLIB. How would I tell if I had mixed
versions?
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
, January 31, 2012 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S0C4 in CEE3DMP
I would add the datasets CEE.SCEERUN and CEE.SCEERUN2 via steplib and see if
your S0C4 goes away
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
PDS has a nice HIST command. If you can get to the Trace table see which
modules it percolated thru.
In a message dated 1/31/2012 4:20:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
version of CEE.SCEERUN RUN2?
are
char *oops = NULL;
*oops = 0; // should S0c4
Quite intentional. CEE3DMP has no trouble with oops.
%BLOCK39:oops unsigned char * 0x0
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Usually FMID and RMID, but if they're mixed it doesn't mean much.
In a message dated 1/31/2012 5:43:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
but IBM doesn't put any kind of
version tag in the libraries? Sheesh! Isn't there another way?
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com wrote:
Tea leaves are good for making tea. :) I would compile SignalHandler.C with
the LIST option to see the psuedo assembly output and see from the dump
where the abend occured and try to figure out what went wrong. The message
Tea leaves are good for making tea. :) I would compile SignalHandler.C with
the LIST option to see the psuedo assembly output and see from the dump
where the abend occured and try to figure out what went wrong. The message
you've given wouldn't lead me to think there was a problem in CEEDMP, but
19 matches
Mail list logo
