Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/03/2008 at 08:46 PM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: What is the problem? What he said. You aren't very clear. The OP was perfectly clear. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Carl Morgan
We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a ?. She selects a specific dataset for output by placing an O next to the dataset. The entire output group goes to the Output queue. I have looked at profiles and can't find what may be wrong.

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Cebell, David
Held queue We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a ?. She selects a specific dataset for output by placing an O next to the dataset. The entire output group goes to the Output queue. I have looked at profiles and can't find what may

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Staller, Allan
There is an open IBM APAR on this I don't have the number handy, but last time I checked (about mid November) it was still in open status. HTH, snip We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a ?. She selects a specific dataset for output

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Ted MacNEIL
We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a ?. She selects a specific dataset for output by placing an O next to the dataset. The entire output group goes to the Output queue. I have looked at profiles and can't find what may be wrong.

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Staller, Allan
As of a few minutes ago: OA25382: AFTER OA23460, USE OF THE SDSF JDS PANEL TO MODIFY A SINGLE DATASET ATTRIBUTE CAN RESULT IN CHANGING ALL D 08/06/04 PTF PECHANGE APAR status OPEN Error description When the SDSF JDS panel is used to change attributes such as CLASS or to purge the data set,

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:22:26 -0600, Cebell, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming the output from the job is under one JOBID, It is ALL the output that will get released. This used to be one of the areas that some of the SDSF competitors were better at, but that should work fine with SDSF with

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Carl Morgan
We are on z/OS 1.9 and the initial acess to the output was from the H panel. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Carl Morgan
This should only release the one dsn and not the entire output. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Ted MacNEIL
This should only release the one dsn and not the entire output. Check the $O JES2 command, which this translates to. I think the best granularity is by output class. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Edward Jaffe
Ted MacNEIL wrote: This should only release the one dsn and not the entire output. Check the $O JES2 command, which this translates to. I think the best granularity is by output class. We have used SAPI for a long time to get data set granularity. SDSF recently started doing the