From Shmuel Metz:
Did he specify a member name or just a bare PDS name? If the former
then I'd suggestopening a PMR; if the latter then I would say tha
There is an ETR and IBM has recreated the problem. Yes, there was a
member name.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/15/2007
at 01:46 PM, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We ran into an interesting situation with z/OS V1.8. One of our folks
uses a PDS for his listing dataset in ISPF 3.12 and 3.14. This
stopped working when we upgraded to z/OS V1.8. After hitting enter we
In this case, you are probably dealing with a record length type of error.
I've seen this in the past, where a PDS has a record length of 133, and the
output was probably trying to use 121 for its length.
Most likely someone in SUPERC development closed(?) a hole in code. In my
opinion, B. A.
In a recent note, Matthew Stitt said:
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:41:37 -0600
In this case, you are probably dealing with a record length type of error.
I've seen this in the past, where a PDS has a record length of 133, and the
output was probably trying to use 121 for its length.
We ran into an interesting situation with z/OS V1.8. One of our folks
uses a PDS for his listing dataset in ISPF 3.12 and 3.14. This stopped
working when we upgraded to z/OS V1.8. After hitting enter we got:
Listing not generated. When we hit PF1 for more information we
received: Abnormal
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:46:08 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We ran into an interesting situation with z/OS V1.8. One of our folks
uses a PDS for his listing dataset in ISPF 3.12 and 3.14. This stopped
working when we upgraded to z/OS V1.8. After hitting enter we got:
Listing not
Mark Zelden wrote:
Thanks for letting us know. But I just checked and that PTF is not
marked PE (at least not yet), so what you really need to do is open a
PMR with IBM to find out if this is WAD or BAD. Is it documented
anywhere that the listing data setcan't be a PDS member?
We have an
In a recent note, Mark Zelden said:
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:56:03 -0600
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:46:08 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We ran into an interesting situation with z/OS V1.8. One of our folks
uses a PDS for his listing dataset in ISPF 3.12 and 3.14.
8 matches
Mail list logo