Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
Have you ever seen a really get-off-the-mainframe project that saved money?
Yes, many times. Unfortunately.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:39:57 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you ever seen a really get-off-the-mainframe project that saved money?
Not when they add all te expenses in rather than just the ones they want to
incude.
Yes of course .
That is good for the few deserving
And no mention of ROI - Return On Investment. How would you even track
when the $28 Million paid for itself? As for efficient, don't most systems add
bloat and complexity instead of simplifying them?
Have you ever seen a really get-off-the-mainframe project that saved money?
Not when they add
Hi,
We had so much bad IT press from some State IT departments lately, so I
decided to share this piece of information :
EPICS Replacement Project - Department of Health and Welfare
Executive Summary
The project leadership of Ryan Fullmer and Randy Ashton in the Eligibility
Program
Subject
State of IDAHO feedback
Hi,
We had so much bad IT press from some State IT departments lately, so I
decided to share this piece of information :
EPICS Replacement Project - Department of Health and Welfare
Executive Summary
The project leadership of Ryan Fullmer and Randy
I think every buzz word on that new fangled project management stuff is
in there. This is such bull.Can't they just say we made the process more
efficient, and eliminated waste? No, too simple... And probably not the
case. Inertia is pretty strong
Anton Britz wrote:
Hi,
We had so
In a message dated 7/17/2008 10:01:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
efficient, and eliminated waste? No, too simple... And probably not the
case. Inertia is pretty strong
Well you get to fill out your bingo buzzword card and look for the lights to
shine
7 matches
Mail list logo
