Roger Bowler wrote:
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up the struggle to
bring back competition into the IBM mainframe market.
http://openmainframe.org/featured-articles/the-t3-technologies-story.html
I assume this means T3 wants IBM to buy them.
--
Edward E Jaffe
After what happened to PSI they must be feeling so left out ! In any case it
could be more profitable than quietly fading away.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:31:10 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Roger Bowler wrote:
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up the struggle to
bring back competition into the IBM mainframe market.
http://openmainframe.org/featured-articles/the-t3-technologies-story.html
Roger Bowler
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/rbowler
Hercules the people's mainframe
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up the struggle to
bring back competition into the IBM mainframe market.
Or it could be construed as beating a dead horse
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Roger Bowler
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: T3 files complaint against IBM
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up the struggle
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: T3 files complaint against IBM
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up
In a message dated 1/20/2009 8:55:58 A.M. Central Standard Time,
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com writes:
Given IBM's behavior, T3 and FSI are the only ways one would get a drop and
play mainframe (vis-à-vis MP3000). Which in my opinion is what it would take
to go into server farms to have a
7 matches
Mail list logo
