I think this is exactly what SHARE (or other user groups)
are for. To give guidance to IBM on important issues and
I think (just like OCO) this is an issue.
We've done that. Brian has said that. Sam has said that.
I am saying that. A number of other people familiar to this
list have also
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 21:33:34 -0500, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think I have mentioned this before. Maybe its time to bring this to
the SHARE *BOARD* and let them tangle with IBM on this.
Isn't that what SHARE is for? (or any other user group for that
matter?) When an *IMPORTANT* item
On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
-SNIP-
Ed,
I think I finally understand what you've been saying about SHARE for
years. (Understand. Not necessarily agree.) My knee-jerk
reaction to
your comment was That's not what SHARE is for - no more than
3 matches
Mail list logo
