On 4 Dec 2009 07:05:39 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of wmklein
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Fwd: editting testing COBOL code
As a reminder, if you are licensed to CICS Transaction Server Version 3 or
higher, or IMS Transaction Manager Version 9 or higher, your first Rational
Developer for System z license is available at no charge. You can open PMRs
with the CICS or IMS teams for specific RDz use cases related to CICS
2009/12/4 David Alcock mainframed...@sbcglobal.net:
I'm unfamiliar with RDz. I guess it is this product:
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rdz/
Indeed it is.
Does the editor run on the PC?
Yes.
If so can it edit PC files?
Yes. (Depending on file type, of course.)
Is the user
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Alcock
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL?
I'm unfamiliar with RDz. I guess it is this product:
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rdz/
Yep; that's the one.
Does the editor run on the
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Alcock
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL?
I'm unfamiliar with RDz. I guess it is this product:
http://www-01
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David Alcock
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code)
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of wmklein
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Fwd: editting testing COBOL code
If you send me (off-list) a name and contact information
From: peter.far...@broadridge.com
In any case, establishing an off-mainframe data repository for
sequential and VSAM data and/or an NFS/SMB connection to the mainframe
for sequential data (and all the associated CPU cycles that those
products require on the mainframe) would still be the
On 2 Dec 2009 05:30:26 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Klein
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: editting testing COBOL code
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 6:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: editting testing COBOL code
Snipped
Do you have a url for the RDz reference that documents
At a regional user group recently IBM demo'd their RDz / Endevor plug-in (see
attached Powerpoint). IBM indicated to get to Endevor from RDz install RDz
V7.6 on the host. Config CARMA. Install the Endevor RAM (to configure
Endevor's load module location install Actions). It was also noted that
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: editting testing COBOL code (was:Now is time for banks to
replace core system according to Accenture)
At a regional user group recently IBM demo'd their RDz / Endevor plug-in
(see
attached Powerpoint). IBM indicated to get to Endevor from RDz install
RDz
V7.6 on the host
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL?
I'm unfamiliar with RDz. I guess it is this product:
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rdz/
Does the editor run on the PC? If so can it edit PC files? Is the user
license of $5,500 for one developer on one PC or a site license?
IMHO, if thinking about development on workstations, you should first
split your application in two pieces:
one piece (batch driver), which does the reading and writing of the 4GB+
datasets,
and presents the data on a record base to the
second piece, which does all the calculations and
of IBM PL/I applications including compiling, testing, debugging, and
deploying to Windows platforms.
-- Forwarded message --
From: peter.far...@broadridge.com (Farley, Peter x23353)
Date: Dec 2, 7:30 am
Subject: editting testing COBOL code
To: bit.listserv.ibm-main
-Original
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: editting testing COBOL code (was:Now is time for banks to
replace core system according
2009/12/1 McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com:
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL?
I use RDz with PL/1, though I doubt it'd be much different for COBOL.
The main differences (vs. editing in ISPF) are that I do my initial
compiles as local syntax checks until the code is ready
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Klein
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: editting testing COBOL code
Snipped
You have something set up VERY strangely if you think RDz
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL? How does it compare to writing
Java in Eclipse or NetBeans? We are an ISPF shop. That means that we do things
the way we did it in the 70s. Basically we:
1) edit COBOL code in ISPF
2) compile in batch
3) if bad compile, goto 1
4) test
5) if bad,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL? How does it compare to
writing Java in Eclipse or
NetBeans? We are an ISPF shop. That means that we do things the way we
did it in the 70s. Basically
we:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: editting testing COBOL code (was:Now is time for banks to
replace core system according
x23353
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: editting testing COBOL code (was:Now is time for banks to
replace core system according to Accenture)
(snippage)
John,
My steps are very much the same as yours, but we call step 6 move to
QA. These steps
22 matches
Mail list logo
