Re: Is it possible to write an exit for ADRDSSU to capture backup information?

On 14.12.2012 22:02, Gary Snider wrote: Is it possible to write an exit for ADRDSSU to capture backup information? If so, anyone have an example they would be willing to share? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

replacing system logger cds with a smaller dataset

Hi, I would like to replace the system logger cds with a smaller dataset. When I try to do this I get: SETXCF COUPLE,TYPE=LOGR,ACOUPLE=(SYS1.LOGR.CDS03) IXC309I SETXCF COUPLE,ACOUPLE REQUEST FOR LOGR WAS ACCEPTED IXC260I ALTERNATE COUPLE DATA SET REQUEST FROM SYSTEM 028 CDVL FOR LOGR IS NOW

Re: 64 Bit Common Storage (was Common Data Space Basics)

The NILH req,X'7F' is very useful when switching from 31 bit mode. No it is not. LLGTR reg,reg on the other hand is. By the way the NILH shown is equivalent to NILH reg,x'007F'. You need NILH regx,x'7FFF' if you're try to turn off bit 32 of the 64-bit GR. The STORAGE macro worked (for XA

Re: BCPII and activation profile

I never saw a reply to Lizette's post. We also have an interest in the same topic. We want to encourage members of the technical staff to manage our sandbox LPARs rather than pester--er, request--Operations to shut down/IPL systems that 'we' own. The problem is how to allow these folks to

Re: replacing system logger cds with a smaller dataset

I would like to replace the system logger cds with a smaller dataset. Is it possible to force the use of the smaller data set? Not dynamically, no. You will have to format new LOGR CDSs at the desired size, change COUPLExx to point to the new datasets and reIPL the sysplex, thus cold-starting

Re: replacing system logger cds with a smaller dataset

Thanks -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: replacing system logger cds with a smaller dataset I would like to replace the