Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Mike Shorkend wrote: Something I do for a quick and dirty check is to set hilite to 'C'(type 'HI C' on the edit or view command line). It will colour the comments in turquoise so at least you get a visual if you have forgotten a '/*' or '*/' And you get as bonus the Parentheses matching in

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread John Gilmore
I'm all but certain that 'gregiously' is a typo. Still, it is an interesting one. EX + GREX, out of + herd, yields both 'egregious' in English and 'egregio' in Italian; and they have inverted connotations, bad in English and good in Italian. The prospects for 'gregious[ly]', herdy, in English

FTP with block size greater than 32K

2013-01-03 Thread John Hooper
We are isolating our production LPARS from the development LPARS (as we should) with the only means of transferring data between them being certain authorized FTP processes. A number of utilities generate block sizes greater than 32K by default when writing to tape. If we attempt to FTP those

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Ted MacNEIL
There seems to be a misunderstanding here. The OP asked about JES parms (init deck) and everybody is 'solving' JCL issues. - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL -Original Message- From: Mitch mitc...@aol.com Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: FTP with block size greater than 32K

2013-01-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
John Hooper wrote: We are isolating our production LPARS from the development LPARS (as we should) with the only means of transferring data between them being certain authorized FTP processes. A number of utilities generate block sizes greater than 32K by default when writing to tape. If we

Re: RACF on an ADCD system

2013-01-03 Thread ibmmain
And the DB2s are separately down-loadable from IBM-Dallas. So you can have DB2 V8 on 1.13. I agree that ADCD does not come with it directly, but it is available. So basically what y'all are saying is that this rubbish is nice to have. I disagree, especially for remnants of userids that

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Ted MacNEIL wrote: There seems to be a misunderstanding here. Indeed! Scott Ford ( and me and perhaps the rest of the planet too :-D ) was wishing (with a sore heart) just like the OP for such a syntax check similar to the JCL TYPRUN statement. The OP asked about JES parms (init deck) and

Re: OT - Huge Maple Syrup heist solved.

2013-01-03 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 01/03/2013 08:50 AM, R.S. wrote: W dniu 2013-01-03 15:17, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze: Scott Ford wrote: That's a lot of pancakes With or without sugar/syrup? ;-D Which ones? I prefer 8 pancakes without syrup. I don't like those small 3,5 pancakes, sold in round packs of 1024. BTW: We

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:42:33 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: I'm all but certain that 'gregiously' is a typo. It was, but not mine. Mitch appears to have stripped a leading column or two from the entire cited text. As for topic drift, in my first followup I quoted, not originated, a wish for

Re: New Kaiser Permanente Data Center in Colorado?

2013-01-03 Thread Michael Seeman
IT Campus does not preclude the absence of server and network hardware which is the purpose of my inquiry. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the

Re: BPXP024I BPXAS INITIATOR STARTED ON BEHALF OF... ( was: JVMDUMP032I message)

2013-01-03 Thread retired mainframer
:: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On :: Behalf Of ibmmain :: Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:03 PM :: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :: Subject: Re: BPXP024I BPXAS INITIATOR STARTED ON BEHALF OF... ( was: :: JVMDUMP032I

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Scott Ford
I think we (a collective entity) have identified a justified need for a JES2 parm checker Scott ford www.identityforge.com Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand. - Chinese Proverb On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com

Re: RACF on an ADCD system

2013-01-03 Thread Lloyd Fuller
As several other people have pointed out, the ADCD systems are mainly used by software vendors, mostly for zPDT systems, but sometimes others. And many of us HAVE to support old software: we still have customers that have not migrated for one reason or another. I agree that ADCD as

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Steve Thompson
snippage There seems to be a misunderstanding here. Indeed! Scott Ford ( and me and perhaps the rest of the planet too :-D ) was wishing (with a sore heart) just like the OP for such a syntax check similar to the JCL TYPRUN statement. The OP asked about JES parms (init deck) and everybody

Re: FTP with block size greater than 32K

2013-01-03 Thread Steve Thompson
From: John Hooper jhoo...@foodlion.com To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 01/03/2013 12:22 PM Subject:Re: FTP with block size greater than 32K Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu SNIPPAGE Tape attributes: RECFM = U LRECL = 00

Re: Syntax checker jes

2013-01-03 Thread Scott Ford
Excellent , Mitch looking forward to it Scott ford www.identityforge.com Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand. - Chinese Proverb On Jan 3, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Mitch mitc...@aol.com wrote: Folks, I may have a solution for all of this next week,

Re: RACF on an ADCD system

2013-01-03 Thread Tony Harminc
On 3 January 2013 12:39, ibmmain nitz-...@gmx.net wrote: These ADCD systems are not set up for migration from one z/OS release to another at all, so data transfer from one system to the next appears to be a must. I'm puzzled. I haven't installed an ADCD for a while, but the layout used to

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Clifford McNeill
I received a phone call from my sales rep (at IBM's insistence) stressing the severity of this and 2 other APARs. I suspect that others have received similar phone calls. I am not registered (yet) for the 'System z Security Portal' but I suspect the APAR's details are in there. Cliff McNeill

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Brian France
My manager got the same call the day before xmas from our rep ( at IBM's insistance ). I too was not ( still am not ) registered for this site. BUT I am registered for red alerts. IF this was that serious should that not be the vehicle to get this info out. I do not want to register somewhere

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Mike Schwab
Our site has it downloaded and ready for next deployment. Here is the link explaining the issue: https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21620945 -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Clifford McNeill
the day after xmas, the PTF's did NOT exist at the www.ibm.com/support site. I have not looked since as we do not run either of those components but found it strange I could not successfully search for the PTF's. From the limited viewing of the Security portal, I did not see much in

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Craig . Pace
These are IBM Security Alerts and do not come through as HYPER or RED ALERT, they only come in as Security Alerts. IBM sends them discreetly in this manner to try and prevent anyone from saying Oh, there is a whole..let me use it. If not registered, you will never know unless you get

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Staller, Allan
Security/Integrity information is now specifically restricted to registered users of Resource Link. This is a special area within Resource Link that requires additional authorization over and above the standard Resource Link Access. See your IBM rep or business partner to get access. Most of

Grant permission for TSO Account command

2013-01-03 Thread Angel Tamayo
Hi List, I'm migrating to zOS 1.11 from an unsupported zOS level, I defined a new SYS1.BRODCAST and now I'm trying to format and synchronize but I got COMMAND NOT AUTHORIZED FOR userid. I have been looking in manuals, google, IBM and my notes and I couldn't find(remember) how to get access to the

Re: Grant permission for TSO Account command

2013-01-03 Thread Lizette Koehler
Make sure your IKJTSOxx member contains the correct AUTHPGM and AUTHCMD entries. Lizette -Original Message- From: Angel Tamayo a.tamay...@gmail.com Sent: Jan 3, 2013 4:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Grant permission for TSO Account command Hi List, I'm migrating to zOS

Re: mainframe batch jobs in output queue with USER in status column

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Bolan
There are probably lots of ways for an output job to get a user hold. Are there any messages in the syslog about these messages? Are they print jobs where a printer definition or a job or a user might have requested a hold or a retain time?It might not be a problem (look for error

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Walt Farrell
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:38:14 -0600, Robert Carballo robert.carba...@officedepot.com wrote: Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Here is the link explaining the issue: https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21620945 I did some searching but can't seem to really find details about

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Skip Robinson
Elaborating on the details would be akin to posting a prominent sign on your front door: Attention--lock broken. Locksmith coming Tuesday . . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Tony Harminc
Great - trying to connect to https://www.ibmlink.ibm.com to look at this produces a Firefox warning and www.ibmlink.ibm.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for redirect.www.ibm.com. I'm sure I should just click through; I mean, what could possibly go wrong...

Re: IKJ574I NO SPACE IN BROADCAST DATA SET FOR MAIL

2013-01-03 Thread retired mainframer
Sam Golob contributed a family of broadcast dataset management utilities to the CBT site. Search CBTTAPE.ORG. :: -Original Message- :: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On :: Behalf Of CM Poncelet :: Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:24 PM :: To:

Re: Security vulnerability in IBM HTTP Server for z/OS Version 5.3 (PM79239)

2013-01-03 Thread Ed Finnell
Well, OTOH if you put granny in the kitchen with a goose gun, might cut down on the interlopers. In a message dated 1/3/2013 6:41:17 P.M. Central Standard Time, jo.skip.robin...@sce.com writes: Attention--lock broken. Locksmith coming Tuesday