Thanks.
On Sun, 5 May 2013 14:27:41 -0400 Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
: I am trying to compare two dumps, a before and after.
:
: I am noticing a difference on all records at column 29 (for four bytes)
:after
: the address of the record. What is it?
:
: Where is the layout?
:
:
Thanks, this gives me one extra line:
IEC1301 SYSPUNCH DD STATEMENT MISSING
This looks like some setup or configuration problem to me, since I am not
running any JCL...
I'll have to refer this to the system administrator.
There are no other files or logs, as far as I can see, containing any as
I must take issue with the BIPS measurement and the cross-architecture
comparisons presented in this discussion. They're extremely misleading at
best. MIPS and BIPS are perilous enough within zEnterprise capacity
estimations, but they go haywire rapidly when carried elsewhere.
That should be
SYSPUNCH is where it needs to put the object deck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Etienne Thijsse
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 12:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: as OpenMVS assembler always gives
As mentioned already, its all about the TLB. With memory intensive tasks
using large pages, it lessens the usage of TLB from what would otherwise be
the case, and that potentially benefits (by DAT avoidance) not only the
task using large pages, but also every other workload utilising that TLB
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I must take issue with the BIPS measurement and the cross-architecture
comparisons presented in this discussion. They're extremely misleading at
best. MIPS and BIPS are perilous enough within zEnterprise capacity
estimations, but they go haywire rapidly when carried
SYSPUNCH is required for the assembler DECK option.
SYSLIN is required for the assembler OBJECT option.
Since an earlier post of yours mentioned pseudo JCL contained a SYSLIN
statement, passing assembler options NODECK,OBJECT (in addition to other
options that you are already using) may fix
In
of2170d0c5.b3dd89d3-on85257b60.007023ab-85257b60.00711...@tsys.tss.net,
on 05/03/2013
at 04:35 PM, Kirk Talman rkueb...@tsys.com said:
But is the notation such that 1234567 = 1205.657Ki?
ITYM 1205.631Ki.
And how would one write the Mi value to as many places?
foo = (foo/1048576)Mi; the
In
cajtoo5_ed5s0uqief8aytixs1-ey5fcda-_xcz3k3spqyjn...@mail.gmail.com,
on 05/03/2013
at 05:22 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
When you build a memory chip, the input is X number of address bits,
Hasn't anybody built ternary memory?
Silly wabbit, trits are for kids.
When you
In 8d96815f-e298-46fd-9ef5-f3c53f0a1...@yahoo.com, on 05/03/2013
at 06:08 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
I always used K, with the understanding it was 1024
I guess that you never programmed the CDC 6x00 and Cyber 70 machines,
where they referred to 512 as octal K.
--
In
cae1xxdfkms1d9p+emdpioapnugq-rvtanjcvxo+uuz99r8s...@mail.gmail.com,
on 05/04/2013
at 08:56 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
In situations of this kind the needs of the unlettered must come
first. The word 'inflammable' does not mean 'cannot be set aflame';
some of the unlettered
Or just specify the GOFF (-mGOFF) option which forces OBJECT and is MUCH more
useful when combining things with C.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: J R jayare...@hotmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, May 6, 2013 7:13:13 AM
Subject: Re: as OpenMVS assembler always gives
Actually, Univac played with it back in the 1960s/1970s. I believe they were
working with someone from OSU. As far as I know, they never marketed a product
with it, but it was at least researched.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+...@patriot.net
To:
Or maybe just for a PDSE since PDSes are basically moribund.
This is just a weird thought, feel free to call me an idiot. But there are
two classes of members in a PDS at present. There are normal member and
there are ALIASes. It generally seems that an ALIAS does not contain a TTR
per se, but
sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
I must take issue with the BIPS measurement and the cross-architecture
comparisons presented in this discussion. They're extremely misleading at
best. MIPS and BIPS are perilous enough within zEnterprise capacity
estimations, but they go haywire
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013g.html#5 SAS Deserting the MF?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013g.html#7 SAS Deserting the MF?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013g.html#9 SAS Deserting the MF?
one of the claims about x86 performance increase in BIPS over the past
decade has been attributed to
On 5/6/2013 6:58 AM, John McKown wrote:
... It generally seems that an ALIAS does not contain a TTR
per se, but actually contains the actual member name. Am I remembering
correctly?
From IGWSMDE:
THE FOLLOWING IS A CASE BY CASE DIAGRAM OF THE POSSIBLE
SECTIONS CONTAINED IN THE SMDE:
1)
John McKown wrote:
... feel free to call me an idiot.
No. I will *NOT* do that.
It generally seems that an ALIAS does not contain a TTR per se, but actually
contains the actual member name.
AFAIK, ALIAS does contains a TTR, but that is the same as the original member.
If so, then why
UNIX is rather easy:
cat file1 file2 file3 otherfile prefix-of-files* | command
quite often, if the command expects one or more files, then a single dash
can stand for read stdin at this point. In Linux (and z/OS) shell, it is
possible to read /dev/fd/0 if the command doesn't implement the - as
On 5/6/2013 9:58 AM, John McKown wrote:
This is just a weird thought, feel free to call me an idiot. But there are
two classes of members in a PDS at present. There are normal member and
there are ALIASes. It generally seems that an ALIAS does not contain a TTR
per se, but actually contains the
On 05/06/2013 08:58 AM, John McKown wrote:
Or maybe just for a PDSE since PDSes are basically moribund.
This is just a weird thought, feel free to call me an idiot. But there are
two classes of members in a PDS at present. There are normal member and
there are ALIASes. It generally seems that
John McKown wrote:
UNIX is rather easy:
cat file1 file2 file3 otherfile prefix-of-files* | command
Thanks for oiling my rusting memory. grin
REXX is also easy. That is if you don't care to have an extra member containing
a list of members.
Just 2 loops. One loop for list of member(s) and
In such a historical overview, you have to make a selection.
Of course, there are other machines also to be considered mainframes,
for example General Electric machines or machines in foreign countries,
Europe
or the Soviet Union. Some of them were very powerful and sophisticated
and built in
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/610.html
From: Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 05/06/2013 10:35 AM
Subject:Re: OE Historical article re: Mainframes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_computer_hardware_in_Soviet_Bloc_countries
From: Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 05/06/2013 10:35 AM
Subject:Re: OE Historical article re: Mainframes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion
Ron Wells wrote:
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/610.html
Thanks. Very Interesting Article! ;-D
I have ADDed this nice acronym in that article to my list of acronyms: CADET -
Can't Add, Doesn't Even Try grin
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
http://www.homecomputer.de/pages/easteurope_ro.html
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
interesting to see what other were up too...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for
Anyone else just start getting email from BMC - one about the buyout and
another a survey? I can't remember getting this before. It looks like
they scraped e-addresses off this list.
-
The information contained in this communication (including any
Yea, there is also a new article that they were just sold to a private equity
group. Don't know if that really means anything, other than going private.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
BMC has been sold,
http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/06/technology/enterprise/bmc-software/index.html
Regards,
Neil Haley
nha...@ca.ibm.com
Storage Software Mainframe Support
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/ | http://www.about.me/NeilHaley
From: Kirk Talman rkueb...@tsys.com
To:
Yeah, I just saw it go past on Bloomberg. Bain Golden Gate Capitol for
$6.9B. Probably means the software prices will change. Haven't gotten any
spam from them yet mostly online viagra, match.com, and Uphold the 2nd A
mendment.
FWIW Bloomberg has a new show called the Brink. Monday at
Cross Posting to IMS, DB2, IBMMAIN
BMC Software will be taken private for $46.25 a share in cash, or roughly
$6.9 billion, by a group led by Bain Capital and Golden Gate Capital. The
deal represents one of the biggest leveraged buyouts of the year.
Does anyone out there have ANY experience with the EMC DLm6000 virtual tape
server. I am
working for a MAJOR software developer who got one of these for free. They
provided almost NO
documentation. What little doc I have only peripherally talks about SMS
routines, RMM, and
how to run
Dan Espen des...@verizon.net writes:
z/OS still has LPA.
The term for modules that are sharable is reentrant.
Everything in LPA is _not_ mapped into every address space.
Just the modules used.
so LPA came up in one of my virtual memory arguments with the POK
favorite son batch operating
Private equity tends to streamline the organization, load it up with debt, and
then try to sell it later or take it public. See Dunkin Donuts. I doubt they'll
have much leverage to raise prices for products that are already some of the
highest on the mainframe.
My apologies. That last post of mine was meant to be private.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: Bill Johnson [mellonb...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BMC
Private equity tends to
The manuals can be downloaded. EMC should have provided someone in your
organization with an Id and password to their website. If they didn't just ask
your EMC contact.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Back to the Future -- Don't Reinvent Mainframe Wheels
Passing on System z wisdom pays off for you and your organization
http://ow.ly/kBl9Z
or
http://destinationz.org/Mainframe-Solution/Trends/Pass-on-System-z-Wisdom.aspx
--
Gabriel Goldberg, Computers and Publishing, Inc.
US mainframe sysprog is in Rome on Holiday. Any mainframe sysprogs from Rome
monitoring IBM-Main?
_
Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
maybe now is the time to consider converting away from BMC. Questions,
anyone?
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization
-Original Message-
From: Bill Johnson mellonb...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, May 6, 2013 11:32 am
Subject: Re: BMC
Do you have any experience with virtual tapes? We went from a couple of
IBM B20 libraries to an HDS MDL which uses the Bustech (now EMC) to
front-end HDS storage.
We had to switch from SMS Automated Tape Libraries to a Manual Tape
Library. We defined new tape ranges, dataclas, and
Gabe Goldberg wrote:
Back to the Future -- Don't Reinvent Mainframe Wheels
Passing on System z wisdom pays off for you and your organization
http://destinationz.org/Mainframe-Solution/Trends/Pass-on-System-z-Wisdom.aspx
Thanks. Very very interesting! Oh, that brings me memories... ;-)
Some
Mitch wrote:
maybe now is the time to consider converting away from BMC. Questions,
anyone?
Yes. What products and to whom to convert to? They have a gazillion products
which have apparently no competitors...
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Yup. Especially robust when they claimed 'we can replace all mainframe
functions' for $25K. Then 3 server upgrades and 8 new personnel totaling over
$1M; drop the database on Friday before new fundraiser. Backups not usable.
When smoke cleared, junked the whole department.
In a message
On Mon, 6 May 2013 14:34:23 -0500, Darth Keller darth.kel...@assurant.com
wrote:
Question - why do you need 2 sizes of tape? Seems like unnecessary
complication to me. We defined it with very large virtual tape as, unlike
the B20's, there is no space (or very little space) required for the
We recently removed our 3494 tape library. So we stopped using DFRMM and
OAM.
Today we are installing a Luminex virtual tape system. I've recreated all
the tape stuff in SMS, DC, SG, SC and library.
When I go to start OAM I get message
CBR0054I OAM has initialized without object tape support.
W dniu 2013-05-06 22:52, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
Mitch wrote:
maybe now is the time to consider converting away from BMC.
Questions, anyone?
Yes. What products and to whom to convert to? They have a gazillion
products which have apparently no competitors...
There are also gazillion
West Germany:
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telefunken:
The mainframe computer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainframe_computer
TR 4 was developed at Telefunken in Backnang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backnang, and the TR 440 model was
developed at Telefunken in Konstanz
Bill:
Indeed prices of BMC are higher than most CA products (that I have
seen).
Was it BMC that bought the company that had all the DB2 utilities? I
lost track of who bought what.
Ed
On May 6, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Bill Johnson wrote:
Private equity tends to streamline the organization, load
BMC had a passel of DB2 tools, as also does CA, and CA got theirs from
acquiring Platinum.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original Message -
From: Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 4:43:55 PM
Subject: Re: BMC
Bill:
Indeed
BMC bought MQ Software (QPASA) a couple of years ago. Then renamed it some
ridiculously long BMC middleware management.name.
From: Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: BMC
OAM is obsolete. Remember mainframe based optical drives? That's what OAM
was for. It interfaced with DB2 which was where it kept it's catalog. OTIS
was in there too, somewhere.
Ignore it. I do with no problems.
On May 6, 2013 4:04 PM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently removed
OAM is used for SMS Tape management.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 3:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OAM - CBR0054I
OAM is obsolete. Remember mainframe
Mark
Maybe this apar OA38956: CBR0401I OSREQ RETRIEVE RET = 0010 REAS =
D0030441
* USERS AFFECTED: OAM Object support users who do not have *
* a valid OAM=XX keyword specified in *
*
Elardus:
a couple of examples. Control/M can be replaced (automatically) by TWS.
BIM by Ws-Planning from RES (www.res-it.com). There is a vendor that provides
a full automated conversion of entire vendor suites, BMC being one, with their
tools to other vendor products. Check out RSM
On 2013-05-06 05:42:47 Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Hmmm, I note your comment, but I want to give you some TIPS, what about
TIPS? (Terabyte Instructions per Seconds)
I think you mean Trillions of Instructions Per Second. :-)
Leslie
Congrats, Fran! We're looking forward to 50 more!!
ObAnecdote:When I worked at UofWaterloo, I started on my 19th birthday. Their
pension plan paid 2% of your final salary per year of service. If I'd stayed
there 'till 65, I would have retired at 94% of my final salary...plus Canada
Pension. It
Congrats, Fran ..
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On May 6, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Congrats, Fran! We're looking forward to 50 more!!
ObAnecdote:When I worked at UofWaterloo, I started on my 19th
My gratitude to all who helped. Every time I come with these questions I
learn much, this time including how to read. Finished up with what Terry and
George proposed:
//AP02 JOB (CONRAD),'IBMUSE2',
// CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=0,MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
//JOBLIB DD
60 matches
Mail list logo
