On 8/23/2013 4:56 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
Facebook's going on 5 hours of downtime. IBMLink is kicking it's butt
for availability this week.
Haha! It must be a regional thing. Facebook has been up for me all day
long...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive Nor
Facebook's going on 5 hours of downtime. IBMLink is kicking it's butt
for availability this week.
--
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the messag
Also, DFHSM doesn't need to be a high priority task. It will always be I/O
constrained, not CPU. Well-tuned migration rules should prevent recall
seriously impacting producton for.
I run EXPIREBV twice, everyday.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LIS
I have NO idea what your point is!
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: "R.S."
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:56:52
To:
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SCRT questi
We run EXPIREBV only on weekends and we let it run all day long along with all
HSM functions and have never had an issue. We've been running this way for
several years.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
W dniu 2013-08-23 16:35, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
Why overkill?
45 blocks fill a track, and I'm anal enough to like the first member to start
on a track boundary.
PS: I'm too anal retentive to have OCD!
Wrong forum IMHO (I mean "anal").
Regarding meritum: It's not.
Proof:
Current Utilization
Used
I will be escalating through my IBM management team.
Seems like a pretty poor system that cannot send a notification once and then
stop.
Also, while my case was open I did not receive notifications even though I had
requested them on updates.
So, sounds like IBM Link SR function has a big bug.
Hi, We have four lpars, running zOS 1.13 and use dfhsm. On 3 of the lpars,
expirebv is always held.
Every morning at 7:30,automation issues this command on
just one of our four lpars:
HSEND EXPIREBV NONSMSVERSIONS(DBU(5) CATALOGEDDATA(50) -
UNCATALOGEDDATA(0)) EXECUTE RESUME
and at 17:00..th
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:28:19 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
>Whether WAD, 'working as designed', or BAD, 'broken as designed', is
>perhaps moot.
>
>The problem of selecting one among several modules of the same name in
>different PDS[E]s for inclusion in an executable is much better
>addressed by usin
I got an email containing this the other day, as I was still on the phone
waiting to talk to a person:
--
View and update your service request at
https://www-947.ibm
I found this thread when searching
http://www.mail-archive.com/ibm-main@bama.ua.edu/msg97604.html
Timothy Sipples Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:55:02 -0700
In my answer I'm assuming the VSAM is on z/OS rather than z/VSE. Here are
some IBM options, not necessarily in order:
1. IBM InfoSphere Classic Feder
Their server is probably infected with dread Corona malware...hold the lime!
In a message dated 08/23/13 10:36:02 Central Daylight Time,
bherr...@txfb-ins.com writes:
get notifications when nothing was actually updated in the SR
-
Thank You Michael and Seymour for your thought invoking responses. I will use
RENT.
Thanks Again, Dave
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Toole, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
It is related to the comment that an SCRT report data set that is PO VB 4096 is
"perhaps not right."
Sorry for confusing you with the topic drift.
Regards,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Fri
And we seem to get notifications when nothing was actually updated in the SR.
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kreiter, Chuck
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-M
On 2013-08-23 08:52, Mark Regan wrote:
> Does IBM have a z/OS product that allows access to VSAM data via
JDBC? A Google search has turned up several ISV products, but nothing
really that I could find about an IBM product.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark Regan
> <><
In March 2005, IBM directed me to lo
I noticed getting the same update several times for an SR we had open.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 8:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Anyone being notified
I had opened an SR with IBM on Aug 14. Then on Aug 15 I closed the case as
my problem was resolved.
Since then I have received about 12 notifications that my case has been
closed.
I was wondering if anyone else was seeing this issue.
I have contacted the SR Help desk and they say they
Program calls (PC) is a Z/Architecture feature that has a z/OS server, PCAUTH,
ASID 2 to administer it. The ETCON, ETDES, ETDIS, and ETDEF macros are the
primary interfaces into that server. It's the first PC numbers defined in the
system during IPL in the range of 0 to x. Chapter 5, Program Ex
Why overkill?
45 blocks fill a track, and I'm anal enough to like the first member to start
on a track boundary.
PS: I'm too anal retentive to have OCD!
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: "Richards, Robert B."
Sender: IBM Mainfr
Whether WAD, 'working as designed', or BAD, 'broken as designed', is
perhaps moot.
The problem of selecting one among several modules of the same name in
different PDS[E]s for inclusion in an executable is much better
addressed by using a binder LIBRARY control statement than by fiddling
with conc
In
,
on 08/23/2013
at 07:30 AM, Quasar Chunawala said:
>I work as an application programmer with a leading bank on
>CICS/Cobol for the past 4 years. Whilst I know, that data on the
>mainframe is stored on disks and tapes, I have never walked in to
>a data-center. At any mainframe data-cente
In <1249405589954549.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
08/22/2013
at 05:27 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>A consequence is that DDLIST member search of a mixed catenation will
>bypass a UNIX directory and report instead a member in a PDS(E) later
>in the catenation, whereas BLDL will find
In my experience a S0D6-027 implies that the LX owning address space has
terminated (normally or abnormally) but the program(s) issuing PC
instructions to that LX continue. I would review your design for
"terminating the LX owning address space and stopping the PC calls".
A simple test case th
quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com (Quasar Chunawala) writes:
> I work as an application programmer with a leading bank on CICS/Cobol for
> the past 4 years. Whilst I know, that data on the mainframe is stored on
> disks and tapes, I have never walked in to a data-center. At any mainframe
> data-center, w
Does IBM have a z/OS product that allows access to VSAM data via JDBC? A Google
search has turned up several ISV products, but nothing really that I could find
about an IBM product.
Thanks,
Mark Regan
<><
--
For IBM-MAIN sub
The mainframe has a huge potential to support a lot of web based functions
as well as provide a platform for a midrange/open systems environments could
use.
Currently I am researching using CICS as the portal to a cloud environment.
I am in the early stages of this research, but it looks promisi
Hi Lizette,
Thank you for the eye-opener.
Quasar C.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Quasar Chunawala <
quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I work as an application programmer with a leading bank on CICS/Cobol for
> the past 4 years. Whilst I know, that data on the mainframe i
Our application very occasionally (once every few months) abends 0D6-027, which
means a PC instruction has caused a "Linkage second index translation
exception". I am wondering exactly what this is telling me since the auxiliary
ASID being PCed to had been active for some time and had processed
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>15 directory blocks seems overkill though! :-)
Indeed! :-D Perhaps the original author of that JCL could not decide between 1
or 5, so he/she/it ends up at 15. ;-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Friday joke:
Waiter asks our land's president what he want
I suppose you could use a PS dataset *if* you only were reporting on one CEC. I
never been in that situation since SCRT's inception, so I haven't tried it to
know for sure.
15 directory blocks seems overkill though! :-)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto
W dniu 2013-08-22 23:05, Greg Shirey pisze:
The supplied JCL for SCRT contains the following:
//* FOR SEQUENTIAL OUTPUT (ALL CPCS IN ONE DS)
//* CHANGE SPACE PARAMETER TO SPACE=(TRK,(15,15))
//OUTPUT DDDISP=(,CATLG),DSN=HLQ.SCRTTOOL.CSV,
// SPACE=(TRK,(15,15,15)),UNIT=SYSDA
So
32 matches
Mail list logo
