W dniu 2013-10-17 17:29, Eric Bielefeld pisze:
[...]
Most of the people I talked to had good English, but it's not the
same as American English. [...]
Well, isn't it obvious? Good English American English
;-)
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:22:35 +0200, R.S. wrote:
VyBkbml1IDIwMTMtMTAtMTcgMTc6MjksIEVyaWMgQmllbGVmZWxkIHBpc3plOgpbLi4uXQogPiBN
b3N0IG9mIHRoZSBwZW9wbGUgSSB0YWxrZWQgdG8gaGFkIGdvb2QgRW5nbGlzaCwgYnV0IGl0J3Mg
bm90IHRoZSAKc2FtZSBhcyBBbWVyaWNhbiBFbmdsaXNoLiAgWy4uLl0KCldlbGwsIGlzbid0IGl0
I see no reason why one should have to make a DROPSYM conditional as you
suggest.
You issue the command and, if you have NOSUMMARY, the command response should
be, well, nothing!
After all, that's what the NOSUMMARY is defined as meaning.
From the manual:
SUMMARY or NOSUMMARY
SUMMARY
Ed Gould wrote:
The s0C4 could be something like trying to write a logrec record (possibly an
error occurred during the format of the new record or...
it could just about be anything without basic info its hard to say).
Indeed. Or something with AC=1 could have overwritten your sacred memory
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
My English is poor (as your Polish AFAIK),
What about Afrikaans? [1] ;-D
But there is an advantage! ;-D In sport events, the teams can speak about
tactics/strategy with each other in their own languages while their opponents
can't understand them. Hehehe, our
In 5260a06b.8040...@gmail.com, on 10/18/2013
at 10:43 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
Why would they do that?
Before asking why, it's best to be sure of who and what. How reliable
is the article?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Thought some of us might be interested.
http://www.tnmoc.org/news/news-releases/flossie-first-mass-produced-business-computer-rescued
Something to point at and paraphrase Crocodile Dundee: That's not a
computer. THIS is a computer!
5.5 tons, 6 meters by 7 meters.
--
This is clearly another
I just looked in the Assembler Authorized Guide on Virtual Storage
And it says subpool 0 is always 8
If the books says so, please explain where so we can correct that.
For all the subpools 0-127, the key relates to the TCB key when the first
obtain is done from that subpool.
Peter Relson
z/OS
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:41:33 -0700, Hardee, Chuck wrote:
You issue the command and, if you have NOSUMMARY, the command response should
be, well, nothing!
After all, that's what the NOSUMMARY is defined as meaning.
I don't read the description of NOSUMMARY as meaning ignore errors.
--
Tom
My WAG on the redaction of copyright notices: some developer wanted to use
the OS component without going through some approval process. If true, it
points to an out of control process.
I believe the article. It was easy enough to verify and if not true it
would have been easy to refute,
Thought some of us might be interested.
http://www.tnmoc.org/news/news-releases/flossie-first-mass-produced-business-computer-rescued
Something to point at and paraphrase Crocodile Dundee: That's not a
computer. THIS is a computer!
5.5 tons, 6 meters by 7 meters.
Take the article with a
If it is a whole filesystem, Dss copy. Will do it .
On Oct 16, 2013 1:17 PM, Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com wrote:
Tks everyone...will try the two examples
been very helpful
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains
Rarely I post a note here about my blog. While it is not only an IBM issue
(mainframe or not) I thought this maybe of interest to the list.
In a world where we all have to deal with various aspects of the online
world. We are, both personally and professionally, concerned about security
and new
On 18/10/13 21:04, Kirk Wolf wrote:
My WAG on the redaction of copyright notices: some developer wanted to use
the OS component without going through some approval process. If true, it
points to an out of control process.
Hard to believe. It's probably the most popular js tool out there.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the article. It was easy enough to verify and if not true it
would have been easy to refute, which hasn't
Has anybody verified it?
Check it out:
I'd open an ETR. This isn't a termination message.
In article
9b26bc6a6df52d4483dd73b1fe7b4b066ceed21...@uspho-mxvs07.amer.thermo.com you
wrote:
Thanks Don, but I already have the following in my REXX:
setdef local noconfirm flag(terminating)
setdef global noconfirm flag(terminating)
I
The DROPSYM messages for symbols not found is information (not an error
message). Setting FLAG( ) to any level will not suppress the message. It will
produce the message so the only way to eliminate the message is to make DROPSYM
conditional. The alternative is to direct it to print rather than
On 18/10/13 22:30, Kirk Wolf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the article. It was easy enough to verify and if not true it
would have been easy to refute, which hasn't
Has anybody verified it?
Check it out:
From the book:
The FLAG severity parameters and the messages transmitted follow.
WARNING is the IPCS-defined default.
...
TERMINATING
Transmits only TERMINATING messages and suppresses INFORMATIONAL,
WARNING, ERROR, and SERIOUS (SEVERE) messages.
In article
Thanks Jon, this is the best explanation I've heard so far about why NOSUMMARY
doesn't suppress the NO SYMBOLS DROPPED message.
I'll have to give some serious thought to adding conditional logic to the
DROPSYM process.
The biggest problem I have is that majority of the symbols being dropped
This is easy to fix by having at least one symbol that will be dropped. Simply
equate a symbol that falls in the range before you do the dropsym. By the way
it's closer to wildcarding than a range.
address IPCS
EQUATE 0 /* assign to eliminate DROPSYM message */
DROPSYM X:Y NOSUMMARY
FLAG does not suppress informational messages (BLS18064I No symbols found). You
may feel it should have been a warning but IBM classified it as informational.
Jon Perryman.
From: Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com
From the book:
The FLAG severity parameters and
Ron,
You can use the following DFSORT JCL which will reformat the file as you
need. The length of the file is now increased to 99 bytes (19 additional
zero for all the 19 occurrences if the data is present.
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN DD *
XX123478965456
MongoDB stores it data in BSON or binary JSON and is schema-less.
There is a JSON Schema Internet draft underway -
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zyp-json-schema-03
And, here is an IBM developerWorks article that approaches it -
Jon,
I'm happy with it being informational. I don't feel it should have
been a warning. The doc says that FLAG suppresses informational, but
we've seen evidence that it doesn't. So it's either a doc erorr or
a bug. Either way, an ETR is in order.
In article
You are correct but it's very unlikely to be fixed.
The default is FLAG(WARNING) so why does IBM even bother producing
informational messages that are conditionally displayed. Does anyone run
FLAG(INFO)? Is there anything useful produced?
Jon Perryman.
(Posted with an ok from Darren.)
The University of Florida in Gainesville, FL, has posted an Systems
Admin/Programmer 3 z/OS Systems Programmer position with details available at:
https://jobs.ufl.edu/postings/45929
The ascending severity hierarchy is
INFO WARNING ERROR SEVERE ERROR TERMINATING
Coding one of these values suppresses all less severe messages. A
small, non-definitive test suggests that things work as they are
bruited.
In particular none of these message sets is empty. The question what
A blast from the past, recently added to Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKslgJnQgG8
Starring an 8-mb IBM 3033, 3330 disk, reel tape, punch cards, a
liquid-ink plotter and a 1403 printer that plays Tiger Rag! (at 9:30)
I remember when the video was made. Sad but true.
--
-- Jim
Hello,
My question is about a User catalog getting moved to a different volume.
The scenario is the user catalog belongs to one of our plex with Three
LPARS.(Each LPAR has its own MCAT).
The User catalog is connected to each Master catalog. So for the user
catalog move I adopted the below
DROPSYM clearly shows that it does not follow this hierarchy.
I wasn't questioning IBM's choice about the default severity. I was stating the
fact that having the default of WARNING caused IBM to code DROPSYM with INFO
messages that deviate from the documentation. It's likely other commands
Starring an 8-mb IBM 3033, 3330 disk, reel tape, punch cards, a liquid-ink
plotter and a 1403 printer that plays Tiger Rag! (at 9:30)
Great video.
I looks like the processor is just about the only real IBM gear there.
The tape are STC, the 3350s are CDC, and the 3330s are from someone
that I
Hello Group,
We are running z/OS 1.13 system and I installed CICS T/S
5.1 . So before starting first time CICS, I was ipling my z/OS system to
take all new changes.
But while loading LPAR from HMC, I get success message on load screen but I
don't see anything in operating
On 10/18/2013 10:15 PM, saurabh khandelwal wrote:
But while loading LPAR from HMC, I get success message on load screen but I
don't see anything in operating system message screen . When I tried
checking Hardware message, I have got below PSW code
there 000280009064.
I am
Hello,
I had checked for this IEA304W this message but, I couldn't find
it . The message I am getting on HMC hardware message is
Central processor (CP) 0 is in a nonrestartable stopped state due to a
System Control Program (SCP) initiated reset of the I/O interface for
partition PROD01.
35 matches
Mail list logo
