On 19 April 2015 at 05:39, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com wrote:
I wonder if compilers plant idiomatic machine code - from which
higher-level constructs can be garnered. I would expect optimising
(prefer improving) compilers would defeat that.
Certainly older compilers did tend to
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:46:57 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Had bit 0 not been
pervasively exploited as a flag, 32-bit addressing could have been
accomplished easily.
If there had been no reason to run old code in AMODE 24, 32-bit
addressing could have been accomplished easily.
That was the hope
You were right and IBM site did had some hiccup.
What makes you say that? Did you open an ETR and did IBM tell you the
download server was acting up? How do you know other factors, like
excessive network traffic in your own enterprise, aren't the cause?
Just curious.
Kurt Quackenbush --
All,
We are beginning the process to build the agenda for the LSG stream of the next
GSE UK Conference. This event will be held on November 3 4 at Whittlebury
Hall in Northamptonshire.
The LSG stream will comprise 10 sessions across the 2 days (5 x 60 minute
sessions and 5 x 45 minute
Should I ask this on the DB2 forum, if so, how do I register?
Sorry if dumb question .. am about to download/install Data Studio 4.1.1
and in the Quick Start Guide I find ..
Step 5: Get started with the product
1. Set up the Data Studio web console. If you did not install the web
console and
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Steff Gladstone steff.gladst...@gmail.com
wrote:
The ENQ has to be transparent to the JCL. Could I dynamically allocate a
dataset with DISP=(OLD,PASS)? As I recall the dynamic allocation does not
permit the use of PASS.
Hum, I'm going to go way out on a
Greetings,
How do I use the ISGENQ macro in such a way that the ENQ lasts for the life
of the entire job (or several job steps) and not just for the life of a
single job-step? Would specifying the TCB address of the initiator TCB on
the TCB parameter work? Any better ideas?
Thanks,
Steff
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:09:14 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
Given that IBM CSP and its descendants (IBM VisualAge generator)
generate F signs for positive fields
My understanding is that the currently supported descendants, i.e. EGL,
don't behave this way.
I'm a skeptic
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Steff Gladstone steff.gladst...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do I use the ISGENQ macro in such a way that the ENQ lasts for the life
of the entire job (or several job steps) and not just for the life of a
single job-step? Would specifying the TCB address of the
The ENQ has to be transparent to the JCL. Could I dynamically allocate a
dataset with DISP=(OLD,PASS)? As I recall the dynamic allocation does not
permit the use of PASS.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y.
cblaic...@syncsort.com wrote:
I guess you could do that,
On 19 Apr 2015 22:10:22 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
Given that IBM CSP and its descendants (IBM VisualAge generator)
generate F signs for positive fields
My understanding is that the currently supported descendants, i.e. EGL,
don't behave this way.
Let me
Thanks. It is what I am looking for.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg245444.html?Open
Abstract
This IBM® Redbooks® publication describes the connectivity options
available for use within and beyond the data center for the IBM z Systems®
family of mainframes, which includes these systems:
- IBM z Systems® z13 (z13)
-
I suppose a final job-step to do the DEQ with COND=EVEN would not
always do
the trick. As I recall there are some types of abends that flush the
job
including steps with COND=EVEN, right?
Very true. My favorite: S40D with a nice message about the initiator
being
terminated at end
G'Day,
I am trying to display all replies of each syslog on SYSPLEX envrionment via
SDSF. When in SDSF I place the cursor unde Filter, next I choose 7 followed by
*. The outstanding messages are displayed however the LPAR name is not shown.
Is there something I have forgotten to do?
Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Steff Gladstone steff.gladst...@gmail.com
wrote:
The job is performing a change management system operation (moving a new
program version to production, saving previous generations, providing for
possible fallback, etc.). The operation for various reasons
John Dawes wrote:
I am trying to display all replies of each syslog on SYSPLEX envrionment via
SDSF. When in SDSF I place the cursor unde Filter, next I choose 7 followed by
*. The outstanding messages are displayed however the LPAR name is not shown.
Is there something I have forgotten to
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:24:51 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
The transition was from 24- to 31-bit addressing. Apart from this quibble,
Paul is right here. Unused fields should be initialized innocuously
and, usually, marked as reserved. (From time to time there is of course a
case for making user
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Steff Gladstone steff.gladst...@gmail.com
wrote:
I suppose a final job-step to do the DEQ with COND=EVEN would not always do
the trick. As I recall there are some types of abends that flush the job
including steps with COND=EVEN, right?
Very true. My
I suppose a final job-step to do the DEQ with COND=EVEN would not always do
the trick. As I recall there are some types of abends that flush the job
including steps with COND=EVEN, right?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 6:09 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at
Steff Gladstone wrote:
The job is performing a change management system operation (moving a new
program version to production, saving previous generations, providing for
possible fallback, etc.). The operation for various reasons must be performed
in several job steps. We want to ENQ on the
Maybe if you can explain in more detail what situation you are trying to solve
for would help?
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p
The job is performing a change management system operation (moving a new
program version to production, saving previous generations, providing for
possible fallback, etc.). The operation for various reasons must be
performed in several job steps. We want to ENQ on the name of the program
being
As previously suggested, initial IEFBR14 step (e.g.)
//step1 exec pgm=iefbr14
//dd1dd dsn=hlq.program,disp=(mod,pass),space=(trk,1,1),unit=sysda
And simply never reference hlq.program in the jobstream.
This will prevent multiple concurrent processes on the same program and is a
lot less
The transition was from 24- to 31-bit addressing. Apart from this quibble,
Paul is right here. Unused fields should be initialized innocuously
and, usually, marked as reserved. (From time to time there is of course a
case for making user fields available in control blocks.)
--John Gilmore,
OP is clear about not wanting to change JCL. I've never tried anything like
this, but maybe code in a system exit would work. I'm thinking of either JES or
SMF, both of which have exit points at job initialization and termination.
One issue not mentioned so far is how any transparent mechanism
Using ENQ/DEQ is only good if all participants abide by it. You said: We want
to ENQ on the name of the program being handled to prevent other operations or
changes being made to that program in parallel.What other operations?
Your other change management operations? Or do you mean
Jousma, David wrote:
... I'd use standard JCL DISP=OLD processing on a dummy dataset name that includes the program name as part of it.
Maybe someone mentioned this already, but I was thinking even simpler -
use the same job name each time if the user has no control over the
JCL, with
28 matches
Mail list logo
