> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Jakubek, Jan
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:21 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Downloading from ShopZ
>
>
Hi Folks,
Regarding www.cbttape.org .
It has been pointed out to me (3 times in the last two weeks) that
I haven't made a version cut of the CBT Tape in about 9 months now. ALL
of the fixes and changed files since then are on the UPDATES page, and
NOT on the CBT page. Please
A reminder that the next Hillgang meeting will be held 29 Sep at the CA
Offices in Herndon Virginia. The full agenda may be found at:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/events/HILL0915.PDF
- ADP Customer Experience, Phil Tully, ADP
- z/VM Charge Back Models and Methods, Bill Bitner, IBM
- The LinuxONE
>Peter's post is only partially correct. It is true that Perl and PHP have
>been moved to Rocket.
I stand corrected. But in my defense I wrote I don't have access to those
documents anymore. I still think it was three components that were removed from
the ported tools.
>Also, the Apache
<<
I was concerned about specifying SMPWKDIR in steps DOWNLDP1 and UNZIP1
and DOWNLDP2 of the SKELETON CPPS6101 job used to do the transfer and
RECEIVE from the FTP site.
On 22 September 2015 at 12:25, Phil Smith wrote:
> To find the TIOT, a colleague uses GETDSAB, then pulls DSABTIOT out of that.
> I've always seen:
> L R3,540Get TCB address
> L R3,12(,R3)Get TIOT address
> ...which seems a tad bit mo'
Can you please elaborate on "missed the password to connect"? You have lost the
certificate? Resetting passwords has no relation to secure/unsecure connections
as far as I know.
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
i forgot the password, leo
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on "missed the password to connect"? You have
> lost the certificate? Resetting passwords has no relation to
> secure/unsecure connections as far as I know.
>
> Leo
>
>
Good to know. Glad Phil asked. Thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting the TIOT
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015
On 2015-09-22 12:32, Charles Mills wrote:
What you suggest is what I do:
psa* psaPtr = NULL;
tcb* tcbPtr = (tcb *)psaPtr->psatold;
tiot* tiotPtr = (tiot *)tcbPtr->tcbtio;
Never had a problem with it. Hard to believe this would ever change. I
suspect it would break half
Thomas Conley wrote:
The article talked about a vintage 1960's mainframe, so I guess these
guys are running an S/360.
I find that highly improbable. The (3rd party, perforce) maintenance
cost on a S/360 box alone would likely make the total ownership cost of
something a *lot* newer look
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gibney, David Allen,Jr
The calculation of space required 16489MB * 1.4 * 2 = 46169 cyl is more than
a Mod 27. So, I'd like to use one M27 for
Hi team,
In my shop we are connecting console by using secure 3270 . But
unfortunately we missed the password to connect . How to reset the password
? there is no option for it , is it problem with mainframe or 3270 ?
.Please guide me.
Thanks
Rajesh
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com (John McKown) writes:
> They are probably referring to a z, but doing it in such a way as to
> totally disparage it. The fact that the z13 is the fastest microprocessor
> currently existed just doesn't penetrate their mind because the original
> S/360 was designed in
What you suggest is what I do:
psa* psaPtr = NULL;
tcb* tcbPtr = (tcb *)psaPtr->psatold;
tiot* tiotPtr = (tiot *)tcbPtr->tcbtio;
Never had a problem with it. Hard to believe this would ever change. I
suspect it would break half the vendor code in the world, and half of
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Phil Smith wrote:
> To find the TIOT, a colleague uses GETDSAB, then pulls DSABTIOT out of
> that. I've always seen:
> L R3,540Get TCB address
> L R3,12(,R3)Get TIOT address
> ...which seems a tad bit mo'
Here's my problem. Customer has a specific set of tape volsers that he backups
data on Sunday. On Monday he gets a pull list (currently from CA1) of those
tape to put in a box and shipped off somewhere. After 35 days they return back
home where they are expired. So I figured
I'd create a LOCDEF
Somebody (the plant manager) gets some serious jail time for knowingly
shipping contaminated peanuts that ended up killing 9 people (although
he wasn't charged with negligent homicide (yet)).
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:25:09 -0700, Phil Smith wrote:
>To find the TIOT, a colleague uses GETDSAB, then pulls DSABTIOT out of that.
>I've always seen:
> L R3,540Get TCB address
> L R3,12(,R3)Get TIOT address
>...which seems a tad bit mo'
Follow standard procedures to reset the password in the security system
database.
Then re-logon the console
i forgot the password, leo
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on "missed the password to connect"? You have
> lost
Agree!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting the TIOT
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Phil Smith
Ow, by "secure 3270" you meant console with logon required, I first thought you
meant encrypted 3270 connection.
You can technically use the HMC console to change the console to
LOGON(OPTIONAL), I wouldn't go that route, as Allan said, ask the access team
for a password reset.
Regards,
Leo
Thanks to all!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
In
,
on 09/21/2015
at 04:50 PM, Jim Mulder said:
>>>If ISPF services are not available, the message is
>>>transmitted to the terminal via the TSO IKJPUTL service routine.
>>Is that the routine called
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) writes:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
> Michigan failure.
remember HP had bought EDS:
http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-news/press-release.html?id=169924
originally founded by former IBM
In
In
,
on 09/22/2015
at 10:35 AM, John McKown said:
>The fact that the z13 is the fastest microprocessor
>currently existed just doesn't penetrate their mind because the
>original S/360 was
> >>>If ISPF services are not available, the message is
> >>>transmitted to the terminal via the TSO IKJPUTL service routine.
>
> >>Is that the routine called by PUTLINE? If so, what are the parameters?
>
> >Yes. BLSUTRMV passes the address of an IKJIOPL in register 1.
>
> Then there would
Jon Butler wrote:
>Don't go peeking into personal data just because you have DBA authority.
Why/how are your DBAs able to view personal data in your database(s)? Don't
you use SYSCTRL authority in DB2 for z/OS, for example?
On 22 Sep 2015 08:18:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On 9/22/2015 11:04 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:12 +, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
>>
>> "to date not a single mainframe app
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/china-executes-2-people-o_n_368657.
html
In a message dated 9/22/2015 12:46:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes:
Somebody (the plant manager) gets some serious jail time for knowingly
shipping contaminated peanuts that
True. Because toy computers don't need EPO. Such complex concepts for wee
journalist minds...
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote:
> In , on 09/17/2015
>at 11:11 PM, Ed Gould
Shmuel Metz wrote:
>Intel is almost as old. There have been a lot of changes in both lines
>since the early days.
The Intel 4004 processor started shipping in 1971. One could also argue the
Intel 8086 (1978) is the evolutionary starting point.
If the comment attached to that article is correct
IBM has filed for a trademark of "Z SYSTEMS" but apparently there is some
clarification needed. Interestingly enough, IBM applied for, and abandoned
"ZSYSTEM" in 2006. There are any number of "Z-SYSTEM" and derivatives out
there.
For example there is an active "Z-SYSTEM" trademark for "a
To find the TIOT, a colleague uses GETDSAB, then pulls DSABTIOT out of that.
I've always seen:
L R3,540Get TCB address
L R3,12(,R3)Get TIOT address
...which seems a tad bit mo' shorter :)
Looking at GETDSAB, it's beautifully commented with over 500 lines of
All,
since about 4 days I’m trying to get a simple ASM-Prog running under Java – in
vain…. I hope someone can help me or bring me in the right direction…
I need to get all Data Set Names that are allocated to a DD. So I step down the
TIOT and get al SVA addresses for a DD. Then I try to call a
I am trying to migrate all data on one TSO userid to a new id.
Is there an easy way to do this?
At the moment I have been working using ISPF LMD utiities to generate
HBACK+HRECOVER NEWNAME commands but I can see that GDGs will prsent a problem.
I guess VSAM will also.
Any ideas?!
/Steve
Steve Coalbran wrote:
>I am trying to migrate all data on one TSO userid to a new id.
>Is there an easy way to do this?
Perhaps, both IDCAMS and DFDSS support renaming of datasets using generic
wildcards.
Example from IDCAMS manual:
//STEP1EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=8M
//SYSPRINT DDSYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD*
COPY DS(INC(OLDID.**)) -
RENUNC((OLDID.**,NEWID.**)) -
ALLDATA(*) -
SPHERE -
W dniu 2015-09-22 o 16:22, Bob Shannon pisze:
Like Charles said, there two sides, I'm keep wondering why it was done
I'm a former TDI owner (not the generation in question). Loved the car. Loved
the engine. So, after investing a billion or so dollars in a new engine design
VW finds it can
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:12 +, Bill Johnson wrote:
>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
"to date not a single mainframe app has been successfully ported to a more
modern computer system"
Evidently the Register doesn't know that mainframes *are*
Hi, you could also run ISGECJES from SAMPLIB (z/OS 2.1). It is a simple
dataset enqueue contention monitor written in assembler.
It won't go back in time. It will alert you to dataset contention going
forward. We wrote an article about it in z/OS Hot Topics Issue 27, page
54.
I have a batch job that was intended to compile every member of a directory
that consists of mixed C and C++ source files. FWIW it is mostly C++ files
with a few C files. The C files have an extension of .c and the C++ files of
.C . I use the CBCC proc and SYSIN DD PATH='/u/path/Source/' . The
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:29:35 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Independent tester hired by third-party that wanted tougher standards.
>
I see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen#Defeat_device_scandal
The EPA was alerted to the issue by the International Council on Clean
Transportation
Tom Marchant wrote:
Evidently the Register doesn't know that mainframes*are* modern.
The machines are. Their workforce isn't. It might be if there were affordable access to modern mainframe operating
systems for the masses of young programmers.
But I've only been saying that for 20+ years.
John,
Like Charles said, there two sides,I'm keep wondering why it was done. Was
it a hack or a statement of some sort. There's usually a reason for a
action..
Scott
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> Personally, it makes me want to go out and buy several
Independent tester hired by third-party that wanted tougher standards.
They wanted to use VW as an example of what can be done with clean
diesel so as to force new rules on other car manufacturers.
Big surprise. :-)
Tony Thigpen
Bob Shannon wrote on 09/22/2015 10:22 AM:
Like Charles said,
Bill Johnson wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
Michigan failure.
I've seen so many of these and I understand why these conversions fail. The
Colorado Child Welfare System springs to mind.
Have watched clients struggle with conversions while
Manning / Assange / Snowden found out the effectiveness of
whistleblower protection laws from the U.S.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:29:35 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
>>Independent tester hired by
On 9/22/2015 11:04 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:12 +, Bill Johnson wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
"to date not a single mainframe app has been successfully ported to a more
modern computer system"
Evidently the
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:39:50 +, Michael Knigge wrote:
>S0C4. The CEEDUMP ist weired:
>I hope someone has an idea.
Get an SVC dump or a SYSMDUMP. If you suspect a bad branch, check the BEA.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For
Jousma, David wrote:
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=8M
//SYSPRINT DDSYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD*
COPY DS(INC(OLDID.**)) -
RENUNC((OLDID.**,NEWID.**)) -
ALLDATA(*) -
Volkswagen has now had a chance to tell the other side of the story -- and
there does not seem to be one. I find this story utterly incredible. That a
Worldcom or an Enron or a Madoff would "improve" the books -- I find that
sadly typical of human nature. But that a publicly-traded, global company
Personally, it makes me want to go out and buy several of their cars. (I
believe that the EPA needs to be reigned in.)
And for all those who say "but it's cheating", think about your driving
habits. Many of you will drive 80mph down a 70mph interstate knowing the
odds that a cop will stop you
She hasn't been in charge at HP for 10 years. I rather doubt she had anything
to do with this.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Having consulted at several companies under HIPAA rules, let me chime in. It's
not as though there is someone standing behind you with a baseball bat just
waiting for the opportunity to swat your head.
Most of the practical rules are common sense.
Don't go peeking into personal data just
Reference Manual for IBM 3830 Storage Control Model 2, GA26-1617-5,
describes Read Multiple Count Key Data, but GA26-1617-3 does not.
Exactly when did IBM add the opcode, and did it require the Expanded
Control Code feature?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
Good rules below. I implement them. But, then, I am a sysprog and don't
have any need to see any information about any of our clients. I also don't
have any real interest in their personal information (most humans are
_boring_). I don't "gossip". And I am an adherent of the NSA (Never Say
> Like Charles said, there two sides, I'm keep wondering why it was done
I'm a former TDI owner (not the generation in question). Loved the car. Loved
the engine. So, after investing a billion or so dollars in a new engine design
VW finds it can either pass the emissions tests or achieve high
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
Michigan failure.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Bill Johnson wrote:
>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
>Michigan failure.
Bill, many thanks for this interesting link, but I got a nice picture of a
vulture sleeping on a '404' computer... ;-D
Your link is somewhat broken even after I fixed that
One of the comments:
Re: SIMH
Looking around at some of their purchase orders, it would seem they
have Unisys mainframes running COBOL applications supported by a
proprietary ISAM-type database engine, as well as more modern
applications written in PowerBuilder with Sybase underpinnings.
Part of
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
Evidently the Register doesn't know that mainframes*are* modern.
The machines are. Their workforce isn't. It might be if there were affordable access to modern mainframe operating
systems for the masses of young programmers.
But I've only been saying
Once you create new GDG base entries, it would seem that a simple ADRDSSU COPY
old-id.** DELETE RENAME(new-id) should handle both VSAM and non-VSAM.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steve Coalbran
> Sent: Tuesday,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:12 +, Bill Johnson wrote:
>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
>Michigan failure.
>
".. 1960s mainframe hell" Kinda harsh. And, "... 1960s-vintage mainframe ..."
What model did they have? Could they even get service for
On 9/22/2015 11:23 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
One of the comments:
Re: SIMH
Looking around at some of their purchase orders, it would seem they
have Unisys mainframes running COBOL applications supported by a
proprietary ISAM-type database engine, as well as more modern
applications written in
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Conley
wrote:
> On 9/22/2015 11:04 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:12 +, Bill Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/22/michigan_sues_hp_for_upgrade_failure/
>>>
>>
>> "to date
> (Others?)
Yes. Independent tester was CAFEE. Third-party who hired them was ICCT.
Tony Thigpen
Paul Gilmartin wrote on 09/22/2015 11:15 AM:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:29:35 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Independent tester hired by third-party that wanted tougher standards.
I see:
68 matches
Mail list logo