On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Not really. Barely available any more.
You as a consumer are basically at zero direct money risk from
credit card
fraud. (Unlike cash!)
Charles
Charles,
I buy them yearly (just before vacation) at the bank I go to.
There are still
I just got on offline reply. To clarify, I mean for a program to make this
determination programmatically, presumably by an LE call or z/OS control
block chaining.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Not really. Barely available any more.
You as a consumer are basically at zero direct money risk from credit card
fraud. (Unlike cash!)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, November 25,
> From: "Tony Harminc"
> On 19 November 2015 at 10:14, Gary Weinhold wrote:
> > But you have a valid concern about vendors' assembler code. We should be
> > asked whether we know about this.
(snip)
> One slighly related point: It has been the case from
And because of how easily they are counterfeited by a mainframe,
many places will not accept Travelers Cheques these days.
(Had to mention mainframe to keep within the purpose of this list
server -- Hint hint).
On 11/25/2015 11:17 AM, Ed Gould wrote:
On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Charles
In
,
on 11/24/2015
at 07:12 PM, Roger Bolan said:
>But I can't seem to find where to change them for the SFE line
>command.
Short of writing your own line command[1] I don't think that you can
do it.
Is there a fairly straightforward way to determine the "architecture number"
of the hardware on which a program is actually running? By architecture
level I mean z13 = ARCH(11) and so forth, as supported by C/C++ and I think
now COBOL. By straightforward I mean I do not want to test various
We had a 71 Year old z/OS System Programmer take an early retirement package.
After 6 Months he was bored, so he took a contracting position with an IBM
customer. He lives in New Jersey and the data center is in Florida. There is
plenty of work around its just that Business don't want to PAY
I heard that...
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:22 PM, David Speake
wrote:
Last Friday I was told that there is a desperate shortage of IBM
mainframe talent at most all skill levels and specialties. I have
not done my homework, say on
Kirk -
Thanks much! Certainly worth considering.
I wish IBM were better organized in general around this:
- the C and COBOL compilers use ARCH levels
- the assembler uses ZS- codes which are different numerically
- there is nothing in the PoOp that says "this instruction requires ARCH n."
Yes,
Touché.
Yes, yes, I know, I should be using make. We all have a little bit of dinosaur
blood in us. Some are stuck in assembler. I happen to be stuck in batch JCL
compiles. I should learn make but it is never at the top of the critical path.
Questions:
1. Will make in fact solve this
Charles,
I agree that there should be a compiler or LE API to do this.
If not:
ARCH levels actually map to a set of required "Facilities" (the Principles
of Operation term).
You can test at the facility bits in the PSAE, mapped by IHAFACL.
Then you could use the documentation on ARCH in the
My personal experience. I'm 67, laid off after 18 years May 2014,
consultant with raise Sept 2014, Hired away with raise Aug 2015. Yes,
there is work to be had. More so if you are able to travel and/or
re-locate, but I am seeing more notices for work-from-home. PS, once you
are on Medicare,
Every time I see this thread, I think "cats...Internet..." and almost click
on it. I guess it's true: 78% of all Internet traffic *is* related to cats!
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:53:09 +, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
>
>
>From my personal observation I don't see a shortage of Mainframe Skills.
I do see companies not willing to pay for an experience skill set. In to days
economic climate business are very reluctant to hire staff positions, they
would rather invest in contractors.
.
.
Just my observation.
Last Friday I was told that there is a desperate shortage of IBM
mainframe talent at most all skill levels and specialties. I have
not done my homework, say on Monster.com or otherwise.
Suspect that, if true, it would be a hot topic here. So I scanned
rather
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/24/disney_it_workers_sue/
Where discrimination comes true, allegedly
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
On 26/11/2015 3:18 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
I would point out that, with respect to the OP question, that invoking
RESTful services from headless code usually involves HTTPS and often client
certs.
If you were using Python or Lua on z/OS with standard wrappers you would be
using OpenSSL. Who is
Charles Mills wrote:
Touché.
Yes, yes, I know, I should be using make. We all have a little bit of dinosaur
blood in us. Some are stuck in assembler.
I love assembler. When in assembler, I'm doing it your way.
I happen to be stuck in batch JCL compiles. I should learn make but it is
At 11:37 -0500 on 11/25/2015, Steve Thompson wrote about Re: Yeat
another hotel cyber attack:
And because of how easily they are counterfeited by a mainframe,
many places will not accept Travelers Cheques these days.
I remember a Hawaii 5-0 (original version) that turned on passing
real but
Either a documented API (macro, LE call, callable service) or a reasonably
straightforward control block chase is what I picture.
As I indicate, a table of 4-digit model numbers -> ARCH level is not out of the
question. 4-digit model is obtainable from CSRSI.
I am currently hitting another
Charles Mills wrote:
>I just got on offline reply.
Amazing you get help so fast! Good for you!
>To clarify, I mean for a program to make this determination programmatically,
>presumably by an LE call or z/OS control block chaining.
Care to tell us what you could use? By peeking in an address
We have one product that that compiles their code for each architectural level.
The initial module is determines the hardware and loads the remainder of the
code to match the processor
> but one or two pesky customers want to run on an older machine
So you are saying that all of your customers
To try and answer the question : Why do this?
If you do normal dumps/unloads of production data and ship it to your
DEV/QA/Lifecycle environment - you might use productions like NDM, FTP,
IND$FILE, etc... slow and dependent on your IP traffic or pipes. Or you might
dump to tapes and either mail
On 25 November 2015 at 11:57, Charles Mills wrote:
> Is there a fairly straightforward way to determine the "architecture number"
> of the hardware on which a program is actually running? By architecture
> level I mean z13 = ARCH(11) and so forth, as supported by C/C++ and I
hi
would anyone know how to get the address or name of a PC rtn
Thsnks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I would point out that, with respect to the OP question, that invoking
RESTful services from headless code usually involves HTTPS and often client
certs.
If you were using Python or Lua on z/OS with standard wrappers you would be
using OpenSSL. Who is going to port OpenSSL and keep up with all
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Charles Mills wrote:
What you said is a discovery at least to me. I also find it ghastly backward
Paul Gilmartin already explained it to you.
The Unix world is designed around components, not monolithic regimens.
C/C++ is partnered with the "make" utility. A
I confirmed both in IE and Java Console. Java IS enabled.
This is most perplexing
NameJava(tm) Plug-In SSV Helper
Publisher Oracle America, Inc.
Status Enabled
Architecture32-bit
Load time 0.00 s
NameJava(tm) Plug-In 2 SSV
In order to make a 'foreign' catalog available, I don't believe you DEFINE
RECAT because the catalog already exists. IMPORT CONNECT (whereby you name the
volume) creates all the necessary pointers in the current system's master
catalog. Furthermore, IMPORT CONNECT does not require that the
(Reposting with edited subject. Sorry that I forget to massage it so often.)
In order to make a 'foreign' catalog available, I don't believe you DEFINE
RECAT because the catalog already exists. IMPORT CONNECT (whereby you name the
volume) creates all the necessary pointers in the current
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:24:31 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>Am I RTFM incorrectly? Or has anyone figured out a bit of cleverness to have
>global "default" options that one can override on a source module by source
>module basis. (I have common JCL that I use "universally." I have hundreds
>of
Bob Shannon wrote:
>We have one product that that compiles their code for each architectural
>level. The initial module is determines the hardware and loads the remainder
>of the code to match the processor
How is your initial module working to determine the ARCH level? If you can't
In addition--a point I've made in other threads that touch on 'recovery'--do
not depend on 'one final step' in production to allow for recovery elsewhere.
You must assume that production has died an instant and agonizing death. There
will be *no opportunity* for any further action there. What
Just be sure you don't let catalog replication resume while the catalog is open
on the second system. Much carnage will ensue.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
> How is your initial module working to determine the ARCH level? If you can't
> disclose it, it is fine
It's not my product and I haven’t looked at the code. However, it's simple
enough to build a table of processor types with the corresponding ARCH/MACH
level.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
I might be remembering incorrectly, but doesn't z/OS FTP now support pipes?
--- jerry.whitteri...@safeway.com wrote:
From: Jerry Whitteridge
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: User Cats and Replication Sites
Date: Wed, 25 Nov
... because I have little control over and no knowledge of the specific
instructions the compiler may emit. I only know the ARCH level of the compile.
Here's the background: the product recently S0C1ed on initial execution at a
new customer. We quickly figured out the problem was a box older
On 25/11/2015 10:23 PM, Bigendian Smalls wrote:
Agreed on lua from what I've seen it seems like a fairly competent language
(mostly I've see it from the backside of wireshark/nmap). I'll give your port
a look, thanks for sharing that!
There is a JIT variant called LuaJIT which is snapping
David Crayford wrote:
On 26/11/2015 10:11 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
I love assembler. When in assembler, I'm doing it your way.
I don't share your love. I much prefer a compiler to find my bugs for me. Although I appreciate it's relevance on z/OS
where so many system calls have macro
On 26/11/2015 10:11 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Charles Mills wrote:
Touché.
Yes, yes, I know, I should be using make. We all have a little bit of
dinosaur blood in us. Some are stuck in assembler.
I love assembler. When in assembler, I'm doing it your way.
I don't share your love. I much
Traveler's Checks are still an option.
In a message dated 11/25/2015 3:47:07 A.M. Central Standard Time,
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes:
Until that is stolen too.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On 26/11/2015 3:13 PM, Rob Schramm wrote:
Hmm.. I wonder if NetRexx has anything to help?
Never used it. If I wanted to run a JVM language I would pick Scala
which has the succinct feel of a scripting language but is strongly
typed. And forget writing TSO applications with a JVM based
>Thanks to some help offline, I was pointed to RDEFINE TSOAUTH MOUNT
>UACC(NONE). This allowed me to enter "mount -qv /". Thanks Steve.
I'm baffled. I've never before detected a connection between TSOAUTH in
general, and TSOAUTH MOUNT especially and any z/OS UNIX authority.
Where is the
Hmm.. I wonder if NetRexx has anything to help?
Rob Schramm
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, 11:53 PM David Crayford wrote:
> On 25/11/2015 10:23 PM, Bigendian Smalls wrote:
> > Agreed on lua from what I've seen it seems like a fairly competent
> language (mostly I've see it from the
As far as I udnerstand you replicate UCAT, but cataloged datasets
(volumes with datasets).
I don't see any value in such approach. What's your goal?
Note: it could worth to consider to replicate a set of datasets and UCAT.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2015-11-24 o 23:24,
Hilton hotels are the next victims...
http://www.fin24.com/Tech/News/hilton-hotels-hit-by-cyber-attack-20151125
Quote from that article:
"... just the latest in a long string of credit card breaches involving hotel
brands, restaurants and retail establishments."
Seemed good old cas
I'm using extended 3270, yes it does seem to be absent from the list of 1001
things you can change! There appear to be convoluted ways but noting official.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA44064#more
I've tried this with an RRDS on z/OS 2.1 with UA75273 applied and I get an
RPLFDBK of X'0800E4' ( RPLINVMD).
What have I missed?
Thanks
Steve
PSW: supervisor state, key 8 and ASC mode primary
078C2000 8004B098
RPL: dir,key
I think the signon box is displayed by Java.
Check that Java is enabled in your browser.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:53:40 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>DTL generates something like that when you specify ACTION or
>CRITICAL in MSGTYPE on a MSG tag.
If you are using the default placement for your message, try
coding .TYPE=ACTION on the message definition.
--
Tom Marchant
Without getting too far into the DFSORT internals, I'll just clarify that
DFSORT generally prefers to use memory objects instead of Hiperspaces.
However, rather than remove the Hiperspace support we kept it there. Part
of the reason is that often times the memlimit may prevent the use of
memory
It's not the business doesn't want to pay. The middle men/head hunters want
to keep a 2.5 to 1 ratio
If they pay you $60 they charge the customer $150. I've also told these
middle men/head hunters, unless you
Personally can to the job you can have $30 per hour and I will take the $120
and they
53 matches
Mail list logo