And you can't just compile them with POSIX(ON)?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robin Atwood
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 5:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linking C module with SSL
Charles -
W
POSIX(ON) vs POSIX(OFF) coexistence is a constant PITA. There are two
separate LE environments, why in the world can't they each have their own
POSIX-ness? For example: Try to run an LE program as an ISPF dialog
with POSIX(ON) and you'll find that it is impossible.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techn
It is relatively unlikely that we would implement this in the service
stream. Not impossible.
The information is nice, but it is obtainable via HC as I mentioned and
customers have not thought it overly necessary since it seems that no one
ever asked for it. We implemented it to help our servi
Regarding IEFA110I:
Sadly, I see that the book mentions that this is "new" but the message
itself isn't in the book. I will have someone look into that.
I was surprised to see that the display did not show XCFAS (unless someone
had used the PROGxx LNKLST UNALLOCATE statement), since by default
Can't say I follow.
Would the builtin (which should be a library if anything) create a .tex
file, which would still need to run through TeX itself to create a .pdf?
Or would the builtin take a .tex file and create a .pdf (or other format)?
The latter already exists of course, except that TeX has
Relay #70.
-teD
Original Message
From: John Ehrman
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 00:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
The association of bugs with computers may go back to the Mark I (I think
it was) relay co
SHARE will be back in San Jose March 2017. In the hood.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [
Yes, it was.
-teD
Original Message
From: Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 09:09
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
On 18 Mar 2016 05:18:44 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Ted wrote:
>Relay #70.
Was the
On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Sometimes even if a certain practice is legal it might not be
legally prudent. Civil lawsuits exist in many jurisdictions.
It depends. If someone cuts a hole and left that hole open, someone
can fall in that ho
On Mar 16, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:58:28 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Q). How did I get my CLIST Concatenated permanently? I would
like to do
it again.
Actually, nobody here can tell you -- exactly. ... There is not
"IBM standard"
way to do this.
The way I learned to do it was that logon procs did a universal ex
sysproc(logon) and if you had a pds that had the member logon in it
it would exec that clist and in that clist you could allocate the
libraries to your liking. With the understanding that if didn't have
IBM libraries first d
On Mar 18, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
On 18 Mar 2016 07:27:09 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Itschak wrote:
no recompile involved. Just relink to replace IBM's LE modules.
So what processor(s) is this code running on? What exactly is being
done?
Clark Morris
--SNIP-
I think its a good idea. Pity it took IBM 10+ years to put out a
Messages and Codes for the same product.
Ed
On Mar 18, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Bill Woodger wrote:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27036733
This includes a new Performance Tuning guide, from Day One, by
following t
Sounds a lot like http://www.z390.org/ .
It took about 5 years for one guy to develop.
It emulates hardware instructions and operating system calls. No IBM
software (other than macro definitions for the system calls).
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
> On 03/17/2016 08:01 A
On 17/03/2016 10:12 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
For example: Try to run an LE program as an ISPF dialog
with POSIX(ON) and you'll find that it is impossible.
We do it. The only problem is when you want to run the same dialog in
split screens. PITA though!
---
On 18 Mar 2016 07:27:09 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Itschak wrote:
>no recompile involved. Just relink to replace IBM's LE modules.
So what processor(s) is this code running on? What exactly is being
done?
Clark Morris
>
>Itschak
>
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mark Regan wrote:
>
>
Testing 1 2 3
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Charles -
We are already attaching C programs to each other, the problem seems to be the
POSIX option is not inherited.
Thanks
Robin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: 17 March 2016 21:22
To: IBM-MAIN
After having installed the 5.1 version of the SoftCopy Libaray Manager, the
Knowledge center for CICS pops up in the list when you select the Internet
source.
Apart from that, I don't know.
Cheers,
Jantje.
--
For IBM-MAIN sub
You need to be logged-in with your IBM ID before going to the individual RFE.
Catches me every time.
On Friday, 18 March 2016 17:49:21 UTC, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> The URL doesn't work for me:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=85255
>
> -- gil
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
