Re: Linux and C++

On 5/04/2016 10:51 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: David Crayford wrote: Some good free ones are Code::Blocks, Atom, Eclipse CDT, NetBeans, CodeLite. JEdit and the built-in editors in NetBeans and Eclipse are top notch. Really, for C++, probably Eclipse CDT is unmatched. Have you tried Atom?

Re: Linux and C++

David Crayford wrote: Some good free ones are Code::Blocks, Atom, Eclipse CDT, NetBeans, CodeLite. JEdit and the built-in editors in NetBeans and Eclipse are top notch. Really, for C++, probably Eclipse CDT is unmatched. FREE SOFTWARE ALL -- Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body

Re: Linux and C++

There are loads of editors on Linux that have good support for C++. The big question is are you willing to pay? Some good free ones are Code::Blocks, Atom, Eclipse CDT, NetBeans, CodeLite. If you have a spare $300 Slickedit is good. Sublime is cheap and a very good editor. On 5/04/2016

Re: Linux and C++

On 5/04/2016 10:16 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: Steve Beaver wrote: I have already decided to use SUSE Enterprise 64. Which IDE that has an imbedded compiler would any of you suggest to use? Linux comes with GCC, the best compiler in the world. The various IDE's that run on Linux support

Re: Linux and C++

Steve Beaver wrote: I have already decided to use SUSE Enterprise 64. Which IDE that has an imbedded compiler would any of you suggest to use? Linux comes with GCC, the best compiler in the world. The various IDE's that run on Linux support GCC projects and write your makefiles and

Linux and C++

I'm afraid I'm going to start another active thread. I own Visual Studio 13 that has a C++ compiler in it. If I want to move AWAY from Visual Studio 13. I have already decided to use SUSE Enterprise 64. Which IDE that has an imbedded compiler would any of you suggest to use? Steve

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

Personally I have NEVER used subscript range. I have always checked the upper ranges Before I do anything having to do with indexing through arrays Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Monday,

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

Apparently, Cobol 5.1 no longer allows turning off the subscript range checking. And the original post stated the failure occurs when the exceed the defined maximum number of occurrences. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:08:08 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote: >https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea100/ceea1mst83.htm > > >On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Cameron Conacher wrote: >> We need up turning off optimization and the program compiled. >> We are now

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea100/ceea1mst83.htm On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Cameron Conacher wrote: > We need up turning off optimization and the program compiled. > We are now seeing some coding issues. We have programs

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

We need up turning off optimization and the program compiled. We are now seeing some coding issues. We have programs that SET INDEX-ITEM UP BY +1 where the value would would be larger than the OCCURS clause defined. Resulting in 0C7. We do not see this with previous versions if COBOL. Sent from

Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared dasd

We've had a three-member basic sysplex for 15 years. It manages DASD mirroring, so it's kind of a one-trick pony. It works fine for what it does. One console view, one JESplex, one RACF plex, etc. Supported only by CTCs. I can't speak to scaling, although I would expect GRS ring to be the main

Re: IBM Security chat session April 8th 11 am -12 noon on Reddit AMA

IBM will be holding a Reddit AMA (ask me anything) chat session on z Systems Security this Friday April 8th at 11 am EDT for one hour Learn more about z security. Topics will include crypto, MFA, RACF, zSecure, TKE and other related z security topics. Note The link will be activated about

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared dasd

I'm working on setting up a CTC-only Basic Sysplex (not Parallel, no-CF's). From what I read, basic plexes don't scale well, as ENQs have to go around to each system, which may be why your IBM guy advised against it. Ken This is from z/OS 1.13 DFSMS Using data Sets SC26-7410-11

Re: JVM FindClass returning Null

Ray, Thank you! I also figured out I wasn't in the working directory I thought I was in. The code now looks like this: chdir("/u/vendor/jig/DOMYAPI3"); dirPtr = getcwd(mydir,sizeof(mydir)); printf("current working directory is %s'\n", mydir);

Re: New to Z/OSMF - SOLVED

So what I found is that the UI90034 ptf was applied back in January during the monthly compliance maintenance round and the ptf actions must have been bypassed as the steps to complete the migration from V2r1 to V2r1 with the ptf were not completed. The bottom line is this ptf requires you to

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared dasd

Thank you - I've come to the conclusion that we should be in a single sysplex so we have grs protecting every device. Now the discussion begins :-) -- Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) Mainframe Systems Programmer Enterprise

Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared dasd

Hello Lionel, Regarding your OP, GRS ENQs are generally obtained at the GRS complex level, by various operating system programs and other applications that do I/O. GRS only knows about its own complex, not another GRS complex. In your description it sounds like you have two GRS complexes one

Re: Microprocessor Optimization Primer

Rule 3 says there are events, some explicit (BCR 15,0) and some implicit (interrupts), that force conceptual completion to occur, over and above those required by rule number 1. These rules are for storage consistency, especially between multiple processors. Registers are slightly different

Re: Microprocessor Optimization Primer

On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:30:47 -0700, Greg Dyck wrote: > >1) ... >The results of one instruction are placed in storage after the results >of all preceding instructions have been placed in storage and before >any results of the succeeding instructions are stored, as observed by >other CPUs and by

Re: Microprocessor Optimization Primer

David Crayford wrote: How do I find out how much time is spent in JIT overhead compared to actual processing? What tools do you use to profile your JVM apps? Last year I looked into JinsightLive for IBM System z and the IBM Health Center for Java for an cpu and runtime increase a client was

Re: RLSE does not work with PGM=FTP

Thanks, John, that solved the problem. Barry -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RLSE does not work with PGM=FTP On Sun, 3

Re: Microprocessor Optimization Primer

Operand fetches and stores must appear to occur in proper order. So is it saying that the machine obeys Rule 1? I will bet dollars to donuts that that is not the case, that the machine performs read operations before logically preceding write operations, and that a program can be run to

Re: TBDISP not displaying entire row

>> display a full-screen panel (scrollable if required) that displays >> additional information for the selected row. I agree. Except that 60K is pretty big. It might fit in a panel with a scrollable area, but for large amounts of data, you should consider copying it to a file and then

Re: New to Z/OSMF

Thanks Kurt, yes I did run the generated script to add the RACF definitions for each plugin. I verified within RACF that the definitions are there. What is puzzling me is the "active_configuration.cfg" shows the flags of the plugins as IZU_RMF_CONFIGURE=N. What I have picked up in my reading

Re: Why sort (was Microprocessor Optimization Primer)

On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:45:37 +1000, Andrew Rowley wrote: >A Hashmap potentially allows you to read sequentially and match records >between files, without caring about the order. Can you please explain what you mean by this? Are you talking about using the hashmap to determine which record to

Re: EMC z/OS Migrator

Since only a limited number of people are authorized(2), it was set up with any requested permissions (IIRC UACC(UPDATE)). AFAIK, it should have the same level of access as df/SMS. HTH, Does anyone use EMC z/OS Migrator? Wondering how you have your security(RACF) setup for it. We're

Re: New to Z/OSMF

Trying to get this up and running with all plugins. All steps go well including the -finish step and the step to add the plugins with the overridefile. I start IZUSVR1 up and wait to start the browser interface. After I see the stc quiet down I launch the browser only to see the core apps and

Re: RLSE does not work with PGM=FTP

RLSE works perfectly with IEFBR14 and DISP=(,CATLG) ;-))) (I had to fix it several times) -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 2016-04-04 o 14:02, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM pisze: RLSE is done during CLOSE of a dataset. IEFBR14 doesn't OPEN/CLOSE datasets. Kees. -Original

Re: RLSE does not work with PGM=FTP

RLSE is done during CLOSE of a dataset. IEFBR14 doesn't OPEN/CLOSE datasets. Kees. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: 04 April, 2016 13:54 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RLSE does not work

Re: RLSE does not work with PGM=FTP

Is RLSE ever effective on an input DD (a DD that the program opens for input)? Oh wait, INFILE is an output DD. Never mind. In that case Dr. M. could look into the DD:ddname syntax now supported by FTP. It's also *possible* that a succeeding IEFBR14 step would solve this. Charles

Re: Microprocessor Optimization Primer

note that test was on both 360/67 and 360/65 machines and was atomic. I've commented before about charlie invented compare (chosen because CAS are his initials) while doing fine-grain multiprocessor locking working on CP67 (360/67 precursor to vm370) at the science center.

Re: Why sort (was Microprocessor Optimization Primer)

On 4/04/2016 11:25, David Betten wrote: First the idea of loading all the data into a large hashmap to do the sort tends to eliminate one very important thing and that's overlap. Essentially, you read the entire input, conduct your massive hashsort, and then write the output with no overlap of