Re: S0D6 RC=27 using Latches

2016-04-15 Thread Jim Mulder
> I have an application that is using latches. In general it appears > to be working fine. The latch set is kept in an LE C global > variable in a subroutine that is used to manage the locking > functions. At some point in the code I rebuild a bunch of my data > structures and (not the

S0D6 RC=27 using Latches

2016-04-15 Thread Janet Graff
I have an application that is using latches. In general it appears to be working fine. The latch set is kept in an LE C global variable in a subroutine that is used to manage the locking functions. At some point in the code I rebuild a bunch of my data structures and (not the first after I

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Brenton, Ren
I use CLOCK, which I got from the Share Tape, (I think). I have a REXX wrapped around it that makes it easier to launch, and put in the command table, (I call it PAUSE). What CLOCK does, once invoked, is just run and run and displays a clock, until you hit PF3. I just looked and

Re: TCP/IP question on routing

2016-04-15 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com (Pommier, Rex) writes: > Sorry if these are silly questions, but my brain is really foggy this > morning. My questions are for validation of what I think would happen > with various iterations of IPCONFIG DATAGRAMFWD. > > Scenario 1, I have a single IP address on my z/OS

Re: QUESTION ABOUT CA-VIEWDIRECT

2016-04-15 Thread willie bunter
Ken, Thanks for correcting my mistake. I will see if I can dig up the report RIN6002. On Thu, 4/14/16, Porowski, Ken wrote: Subject: Re: QUESTION ABOUT CA-VIEWDIRECT To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Received: Thursday, April

TCP/IP question on routing

2016-04-15 Thread Pommier, Rex
Sorry if these are silly questions, but my brain is really foggy this morning. My questions are for validation of what I think would happen with various iterations of IPCONFIG DATAGRAMFWD. Scenario 1, I have a single IP address on my z/OS system running to a single network segment out an OSA

Re: Some unofficial early PL/I History

2016-04-15 Thread CM Poncelet
AFAIK PL/I was originally called Fortran VI as it was too advanced to be called Fortran V (as the successor of Fortran IV). It was renamed to NPL after the GUIDE people demanded that it include COBOL's file I/O processing. Afterwards it was renamed to PL/I, as you said. The / was from OS/360

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Sorry about topic drift, but ... Rugen, Len wrote: >When TSO accounts were available to nearly anyone in a University environment, >even with idle time enforcement, some users would take measures to circumvent >such timeout, so I often had multi-day sessions. IEFUTL can fix that, but AFAIK,

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Rugen, Len
I spent too much time in MXG, I always look at the SMF record types first :-) I also spent enough time looking for "the bad guy" that I sometimes think like one. When TSO accounts were available to nearly anyone in a University environment, even with idle time enforcement, some users would

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
John McKown wrote: >> watch for long running sessions that started before the date in question >​An excellent point! Indeed, but let Hilario reply with more details. >This could greatly complicate things because z/OS doesn't generate a "STC >is still running" type SMF record. Sorry,

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Rugen, Len wrote: > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_1.13.0/com.ibm.zos.r13.icha300/type80fmt.htm%23type80fmt ​Yes, but that's definitely ​for the elite programmers. > > > Probably code 0 > > watch for long running

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Rugen, Len
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_1.13.0/com.ibm.zos.r13.icha300/type80fmt.htm%23type80fmt Probably code 0 watch for long running sessions that started before the date in question -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Hilario Garcia wrote: > Hello, > > I need to obtain a list of users that access to the Z/OS (CICS, TSO, > Batch) in a specific date. > > ¿ Is there any job to obtain this data from RACF or SMF ? > Yes. There is a RACFRW program which you can

Re: List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Hilario Garcia wrote: >I need to obtain a list of users that access to the Z/OS (CICS, TSO, Batch) in >a specific date. >¿ Is there any job to obtain this data from RACF or SMF ? Yes, you can do that using SMF. But you need to specify what type of access do you need to review. There are good

List user's

2016-04-15 Thread Hilario Garcia
Hello, I need to obtain a list of users that access to the Z/OS (CICS, TSO, Batch) in a specific date. ¿ Is there any job to obtain this data from RACF or SMF ? Thanks in advance. Hilario -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff