Re: Test email - please ignore

2017-06-18 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
CM Poncelet wrote: >I cannot see them. So thanks for confirming ... ;-D Ok, you can see my message, but you can't see your message? From where do you see my message? In your e-mail or on IBM-MAIN web page? I wonder if you can take it up with your ISP? (AFAIK, there was a discussion years ago

Could FDR copy a dump tape with LBI to disk was Re: help with DFDSS and LBI (large block interface)

2017-06-18 Thread Clark Morris
[Default] On 18 Jun 2017 09:38:24 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main stars...@mindspring.com (Lizette Koehler) wrote: If were trying to copy an Innovation Data Processing FDR dump tape created with LBI to disk would it work using the equivalent of the DF/DSS COPYDUMP command? This is just a matter

Re: PDSE dataset rename issue

2017-06-18 Thread Jim Mulder
SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE SETPROG LNKLST,ALLOCATE Use with caution. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/18/2017 12:17:30 PM: > From: Giliad Wilf

Re: help with DFDSS and LBI (large block interface)

2017-06-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
John You are doing a copydump. So this means, you are trying to make additional copies of a DFDSS dump tape. Is that correct? If not, what is the intent of coping the DUMP TAPE to DASD? With the COPYDUMP command, you can make from 1 to 255 copies of DFSMSdss-produced dump data. The data

Re: help with DFDSS and LBI (large block interface)

2017-06-18 Thread John Dawes
I am able to do a tape to tape copy without any issues.  However tape to disk doesn't work because the default of tape blksize is 262144 and the maximum blksize that is supported for DASD is 32760.  I guess nothing can be done. On Fri, 16/6/17,

Re: PDSE dataset rename issue

2017-06-18 Thread Giliad Wilf
On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:45:25 +0300, venkat kulkarni wrote: >Hello Group, >We have requirement to add new SYS1.SIEKLNKE dataset into system. But this >dataset was allocated to LLA and XCF. So, we unallocated to linklist and >stop LLA. After this, we tried renaming

Re: CSSMTP user exit and external email

2017-06-18 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
It was pointed out to me that I may have given #3 too short shrift. We do not control destination addresses, but I suppose that a shop may have such a requirement. Again: if not for Outlook, then why for SMTP? If one is to use a program to generate the SMTP text, then it would be a simple

Re: TRTCH=NOCOMP and SMS Compression

2017-06-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
I do not think TRTCH (as it is a DCB parm) is managed by SMS. I think what you need to look at is COMPACTION and not TRTCH. If you are going to redirect the file to true "tape" then TRTCH might be valid. Note: TRTCH is not applicable for DASD data sets. If specified, it will be ignored. If

Re: CSSMTP user exit and external email

2017-06-18 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-06-17, at 21:06, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > We have an RYO program available to the entire company. I use it routinely to > send messages and attachments internally and externally with no impediments. > The author of this program feels that > > #1 is satisfied by simply allowing anyone

Re: Test email - please ignore

2017-06-18 Thread Edward Finnell
Great! 'fraid there's gonna be lots more swoops in the next few months as the ISPs merge. In a message dated 6/18/2017 12:56:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time, ponce...@bcs.org.uk writes: Thanks a lot for that. Done. Cheers

Re: EREP Symptom and/or Software Records

2017-06-18 Thread Edward Finnell
>From what we've gleaned so far, EREP is just 'holding the mirror' and some sort of WAIT is causing the CATALOG REDRIVE and is symptomatic of a tuning opportunity. From a sysprog perspective I'm going to review WLM, DB2 buffer use and device busy. Craig Mullins DB/2 series is great and

Re: EREP Symptom and/or Software Records

2017-06-18 Thread Tim Hare
It's been a few years (retired / consulting now) since I had the duty of looking at EREP records but as with what many others have said, it's about what seems "normal" in your environment, although I've had instances of 0C4 that was occuring regularly, though handled by the piece of software in

TRTCH=NOCOMP and SMS Compression

2017-06-18 Thread Tim Hare
We have a job which creates "tape" files in TMM (Tape Mount Management) via SMS redirection. The data class assigned to the output dataset has SMS tailored compression turned on. I would like to see how much that compression is costing in CPU time by running the job without compression.